qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 05/24] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_m32
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:00:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023150057.25731-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023150057.25731-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>

Create a function to compute the values of the TBFLAG_A32 bits
that will be cached, and are used by M-profile.

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 4c65476d93..d4303420da 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -11083,6 +11083,29 @@ static uint32_t rebuild_hflags_common_32(CPUARMState *env, int fp_el,
     return rebuild_hflags_common(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, flags);
 }
 
+static uint32_t rebuild_hflags_m32(CPUARMState *env, int fp_el,
+                                   ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
+{
+    uint32_t flags = 0;
+
+    if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
+        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, HANDLER, 1);
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * v8M always applies stack limit checks unless CCR.STKOFHFNMIGN
+     * is suppressing them because the requested execution priority
+     * is less than 0.
+     */
+    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8) &&
+        !((mmu_idx & ARM_MMU_IDX_M_NEGPRI) &&
+          (env->v7m.ccr[env->v7m.secure] & R_V7M_CCR_STKOFHFNMIGN_MASK))) {
+        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, STACKCHECK, 1);
+    }
+
+    return rebuild_hflags_common_32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, flags);
+}
+
 static uint32_t rebuild_hflags_a64(CPUARMState *env, int el, int fp_el,
                                    ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
 {
@@ -11168,7 +11191,13 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong *pc,
         }
     } else {
         *pc = env->regs[15];
-        flags = rebuild_hflags_common_32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, 0);
+
+        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
+            flags = rebuild_hflags_m32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx);
+        } else {
+            flags = rebuild_hflags_common_32(env, fp_el, mmu_idx, 0);
+        }
+
         flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, THUMB, env->thumb);
         flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, VECLEN, env->vfp.vec_len);
         flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, VECSTRIDE, env->vfp.vec_stride);
@@ -11204,20 +11233,6 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong *pc,
         }
     }
 
-    if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
-        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, HANDLER, 1);
-    }
-
-    /* v8M always applies stack limit checks unless CCR.STKOFHFNMIGN is
-     * suppressing them because the requested execution priority is less than 0.
-     */
-    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8) &&
-        arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M) &&
-        !((mmu_idx  & ARM_MMU_IDX_M_NEGPRI) &&
-          (env->v7m.ccr[env->v7m.secure] & R_V7M_CCR_STKOFHFNMIGN_MASK))) {
-        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, STACKCHECK, 1);
-    }
-
     if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY) &&
         FIELD_EX32(env->v7m.fpccr[M_REG_S], V7M_FPCCR, S) != env->v7m.secure) {
         flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TBFLAG_A32, FPCCR_S_WRONG, 1);
-- 
2.17.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-23 15:00 [PATCH v9 00/24] target/arm: Reduce overhead of cpu_get_tb_cpu_state Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 01/24] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_common Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 02/24] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_a64 Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 03/24] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_common_32 Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 04/24] target/arm: Split arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 06/24] target/arm: Reduce tests vs M-profile in cpu_get_tb_cpu_state Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 07/24] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_a32 Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 08/24] target/arm: Split out rebuild_hflags_aprofile Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 09/24] target/arm: Hoist XSCALE_CPAR, VECLEN, VECSTRIDE in cpu_get_tb_cpu_state Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 10/24] target/arm: Simplify set of PSTATE_SS " Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 11/24] target/arm: Hoist computation of TBFLAG_A32.VFPEN Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 12/24] target/arm: Add arm_rebuild_hflags Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 13/24] target/arm: Split out arm_mmu_idx_el Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 14/24] target/arm: Hoist store to cs_base in cpu_get_tb_cpu_state Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 15/24] target/arm: Add HELPER(rebuild_hflags_{a32, a64, m32}) Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 16/24] target/arm: Rebuild hflags at EL changes Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 17/24] target/arm: Rebuild hflags at MSR writes Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 18/24] target/arm: Rebuild hflags at CPSR writes Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 19/24] target/arm: Rebuild hflags at Xscale SCTLR writes Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 20/24] target/arm: Rebuild hflags for M-profile Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 21/24] target/arm: Rebuild hflags for M-profile NVIC Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 22/24] linux-user/aarch64: Rebuild hflags for TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 23/24] linux-user/arm: " Richard Henderson
2019-10-23 15:00 ` [PATCH v9 24/24] target/arm: Rely on hflags correct in cpu_get_tb_cpu_state Richard Henderson
2019-10-24 11:41 ` [PATCH v9 00/24] target/arm: Reduce overhead of cpu_get_tb_cpu_state Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191023150057.25731-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).