qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <1921948@bugs.launchpad.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Bug 1921948] Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] target/arm: Fix mte_checkN
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:02:57 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0pdt6yq.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20210408100257.GFqI5y22r7OvUHGofqZhwR5Rb8n0mMjBVTgwqtf4Y7M@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAFEAcA9Vc=w9d-3DkwuyY8Vzrj4d=f2zHn4OXauQRc-Vr=oQzQ@mail.gmail.com

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 19:54, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > We were incorrectly assuming that only the first byte of an MTE access
>> > is checked against the tags.  But per the ARM, unaligned accesses are
>> > pre-decomposed into single-byte accesses.  So by the time we reach the
>> > actual MTE check in the ARM pseudocode, all accesses are aligned.
>> >
>> > Therefore, the first failure is always either the first byte of the
>> > access, or the first byte of the granule.
>> >
>> > In addition, some of the arithmetic is off for last-first -> count.
>> > This does not become directly visible until a later patch that passes
>> > single bytes into this function, so ptr == ptr_last.
>> >
>> > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921948
>>
>> Minor note: you can Cc: Bug 1921948 <1921948@bugs.launchpad.net> to
>> automatically copy patches to the appropriate bugs which is useful if
>> you don't have the Cc for the reporter.
>
> I'm not sure cc'ing bugs on patches is very useful, though (and especially
> not for big series). I usually prefer to just add a note to the bug with
> the URL of the series in patchew afterwards.

Ideally the tooling would pick up bug links in Patchew and automatically
update the relevant bugs when new series are posted. I only mentioned it
because the original bug reporters weren't Cc'ed on the patches and lo
now they know about the iteration they have tested it ;-)

-- 
Alex Bennée

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921948

Title:
  MTE tags not checked properly for unaligned accesses at EL1

Status in QEMU:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  For kernel memory accesses that span across two memory granules,
  QEMU's MTE implementation only checks the tag of the first granule but
  not of the second one.

  To reproduce this, build the Linux kernel with CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
  enabled, apply the patch below, and boot the kernel:

  diff --git a/sound/last.c b/sound/last.c
  index f0bb98780e70..04745cb30b74 100644
  --- a/sound/last.c
  +++ b/sound/last.c
  @@ -5,12 +5,18 @@
    */
   
   #include <linux/init.h>
  +#include <linux/slab.h>
   #include <sound/core.h>
   
   static int __init alsa_sound_last_init(void)
   {
          struct snd_card *card;
          int idx, ok = 0;
  +
  +       char *ptr = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL);
  +       pr_err("KASAN report should follow:\n");
  +       *(volatile unsigned long *)(ptr + 124);
  +       kfree(ptr);
          
          printk(KERN_INFO "ALSA device list:\n");
          for (idx = 0; idx < SNDRV_CARDS; idx++) {

  KASAN tags the 128 allocated bytes with the same tag as the returned
  pointer. The memory granule that follows the 128 allocated bytes has a
  different tag (with 1/15 probability).

  Expected result: a tag fault is detected and a KASAN report is printed when accessing bytes [124, 130).
  Observed result: no tag fault is detected and no KASAN report is printed.

  Here are the flags that I use to run QEMU if they matter:

  qemu-system-aarch64 -s -machine virt,mte=on -cpu max -m 2G -smp 2 -net
  user,host=10.0.2.10,hostfwd=tcp:127.0.0.1:10021-:22 -net nic
  -nographic -kernel ./Image -append "console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda
  earlyprintk=serial" -drive file=./fs.img,format=raw,if=virtio -no-
  shutdown -no-reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1921948/+subscriptions


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06 17:40 [PATCH v4 00/12] target/arm mte fixes Richard Henderson
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] accel/tcg: Preserve PAGE_ANON when changing page permissions Richard Henderson
2021-04-07 13:55   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] target/arm: Check PAGE_WRITE_ORG for MTE writeability Richard Henderson
2021-04-07 15:34   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] target/arm: Fix mte_checkN Richard Henderson
2021-04-07 18:39   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 18:39     ` [Bug 1921948] " Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 19:56     ` Richard Henderson
2021-04-08  8:36       ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-08  8:36         ` [Bug 1921948] " Alex Bennée
2021-04-08  8:50     ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-08  8:50       ` [Bug 1921948] " Peter Maydell
2021-04-08 10:02       ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2021-04-08 10:02         ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] target/arm: Split out mte_probe_int Richard Henderson
2021-04-08  9:01   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] target/arm: Fix unaligned checks for mte_check1, mte_probe1 Richard Henderson
2021-04-08  9:05   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] test/tcg/aarch64: Add mte-5 Richard Henderson
2021-04-08  9:07   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] target/arm: Replace MTEDESC ESIZE+TSIZE with SIZEM1 Richard Henderson
2021-04-08 11:08   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] target/arm: Merge mte_check1, mte_checkN Richard Henderson
2021-04-08 11:10   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] target/arm: Rename mte_probe1 to mte_probe Richard Henderson
2021-04-08 11:10   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] target/arm: Simplify sve mte checking Richard Henderson
2021-04-08 11:23   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] target/arm: Remove log2_esize parameter to gen_mte_checkN Richard Henderson
2021-04-08 11:35   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] exec: Fix overlap of PAGE_ANON and PAGE_TARGET_1 Richard Henderson
2021-04-06 18:21   ` Laurent Vivier
2021-04-06 19:36   ` Laurent Vivier
2021-04-07 17:16   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 21:33   ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-06 17:57 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] target/arm mte fixes no-reply
2021-04-08 12:47 ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-08 14:25   ` Richard Henderson
2021-04-09  9:53     ` Peter Maydell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-30 19:34 [Bug 1921948] [NEW] MTE tags not checked properly for unaligned accesses at EL1 Andrey Konovalov
2021-03-30 23:22 ` [Bug 1921948] " Richard Henderson
2021-03-30 23:32 ` Peter Collingbourne
2021-03-31  6:44 ` Richard Henderson
2021-04-02 15:41 ` Richard Henderson
2021-04-02 16:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-04-02 16:31 ` Richard Henderson
2021-04-03 14:34 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-04-07 20:17 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-04-07 20:46 ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 20:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-04-07 21:29   ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 21:29     ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 21:45     ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 21:45       ` Alex Bennée
2021-04-07 21:19 ` Richard Henderson
2021-04-07 22:02 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-05-06 18:39 ` Richard Henderson
2021-05-22  5:12 ` Peter Collingbourne
2021-05-22  5:17 ` Peter Collingbourne
2021-05-26 19:55 ` Vitaly Buka
2021-06-10  2:28 ` Peter Collingbourne
2021-06-10  6:06 ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k0pdt6yq.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=1921948@bugs.launchpad.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).