qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
To: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Li Zhijian" <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-dev <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Zhang Chen" <zhangckid@gmail.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] qapi/net: Add IPFlowSpec and QMP command for COLO passthrough
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 22:34:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210517223444.782d99cc@gecko.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420151537.64360-2-chen.zhang@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4072 bytes --]

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:15:32 +0800
Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com> wrote:

> Since the real user scenario does not need COLO to monitor all traffic.
> Add colo-passthrough-add and colo-passthrough-del to maintain
> a COLO network passthrough list. Add IPFlowSpec struct for all QMP commands.
> Except protocol field is necessary, other fields are optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  net/net.c     | 10 ++++++++
>  qapi/net.json | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
> index edf9b95418..2a6e5f3886 100644
> --- a/net/net.c
> +++ b/net/net.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,16 @@ void qmp_netdev_del(const char *id, Error **errp)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +void qmp_colo_passthrough_add(IPFlowSpec *spec, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    /* TODO implement setup passthrough rule */
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_colo_passthrough_del(IPFlowSpec *spec, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    /* TODO implement delete passthrough rule */
> +}
> +
>  static void netfilter_print_info(Monitor *mon, NetFilterState *nf)
>  {
>      char *str;
> diff --git a/qapi/net.json b/qapi/net.json
> index af3f5b0fda..f6e4e37526 100644
> --- a/qapi/net.json
> +++ b/qapi/net.json
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  ##
>  
>  { 'include': 'common.json' }
> +{ 'include': 'sockets.json' }
>  
>  ##
>  # @set_link:
> @@ -694,3 +695,70 @@
>  ##
>  { 'event': 'FAILOVER_NEGOTIATED',
>    'data': {'device-id': 'str'} }
> +
> +##
> +# @IPFlowSpec:

I think something like "@IPFilterRule" is clearer.

> +# IP flow specification.

"IP filter rule specification"

> +# @protocol: Transport layer protocol like TCP/UDP...
> +#
> +# @object-name: Point out the IPflow spec effective range of object,
> +#               If there is no such part, it means global spec.

I think IPFlowSpec should be kept generic, so object-name should not be
part of it. It should move directly to 'colo-passthrough-add' and
'colo-passthrough-del'.

Also please use clearer wording. Proposal:
"@object-name: The id of the colo-compare object to add the filter to."

Again, if other net filters support the new feature in the future, the
wording can always be changed later.

> +# @source: Source address and port.
> +#
> +# @destination: Destination address and port.
> +#
> +# Since: 6.1
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'IPFlowSpec',
> +  'data': { 'protocol': 'str', '*object-name': 'str',
> +    '*source': 'InetSocketAddressBase',
> +    '*destination': 'InetSocketAddressBase' } }

I think 'protocol' should be made optional too.

> +##
> +# @colo-passthrough-add:
> +#
> +# Add passthrough entry according to user's needs in COLO-compare.
> +# Source IP/port and destination IP/port both optional, If user just
> +# input parts of infotmation, it will match all.
> +#
> +# Returns: Nothing on success
> +#
> +# Since: 6.1
> +#
> +# Example:
> +#
> +# -> { "execute": "colo-passthrough-add",
> +#      "arguments": { "protocol": "tcp", "object-name": "object0",
> +#      "source": {"host": "192.168.1.1", "port": "1234"},
> +#      "destination": {"host": "192.168.1.2", "port": "4321"} } }
> +# <- { "return": {} }
> +#
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'colo-passthrough-add', 'boxed': true,
> +     'data': 'IPFlowSpec' }
> +
> +##
> +# @colo-passthrough-del:
> +#
> +# Delete passthrough entry according to user's needs in COLO-compare.
> +# Source IP/port and destination IP/port both optional, If user just
> +# input parts of infotmation, it will match all.
> +#
> +# Returns: Nothing on success
> +#
> +# Since: 6.1
> +#
> +# Example:
> +#
> +# -> { "execute": "colo-passthrough-del",
> +#      "arguments": { "protocol": "tcp", "object-name": "object0",
> +#      "source": {"host": "192.168.1.1", "port": "1234"},
> +#      "destination": {"host": "192.168.1.2", "port": "4321"} } }
> +# <- { "return": {} }
> +#
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'colo-passthrough-del', 'boxed': true,
> +     'data': 'IPFlowSpec' }



-- 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-17 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20 15:15 [PATCH V6 0/6] Passthrough specific network traffic in COLO Zhang Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 1/6] qapi/net: Add IPFlowSpec and QMP command for COLO passthrough Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:34   ` Lukas Straub [this message]
2021-05-20  5:49     ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 2/6] util/qemu-sockets.c: Add inet_parse_base to handle InetSocketAddressBase Zhang Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 3/6] hmp-commands: Add new HMP command for COLO passthrough Zhang Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 4/6] net/colo-compare: Move data structure and define to .h file Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:03   ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20  1:50     ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 5/6] net/colo-compare: Add passthrough list to CompareState Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:07   ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20  3:38     ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 6/6] net/net.c: Add handler for COLO passthrough connection Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:38   ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20  5:50     ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-28  3:26 ` [PATCH V6 0/6] Passthrough specific network traffic in COLO Zhang, Chen
2021-05-12  7:05   ` Zhang, Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210517223444.782d99cc@gecko.fritz.box \
    --to=lukasstraub2@web.de \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=chen.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhangckid@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).