From: "Zhang, Chen" <chen.zhang@intel.com>
To: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Li Zhijian" <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-dev <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Zhang Chen" <zhangckid@gmail.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 1/6] qapi/net: Add IPFlowSpec and QMP command for COLO passthrough
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 05:49:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c5dfb900ad3458da2a2885488561ec9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210517223444.782d99cc@gecko.fritz.box>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 4:35 AM
> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>; qemu-dev <qemu-
> devel@nongnu.org>; Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>; Dr. David Alan
> Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>; Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>;
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
> <kraxel@redhat.com>; Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>; Zhang Chen
> <zhangckid@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] qapi/net: Add IPFlowSpec and QMP command
> for COLO passthrough
>
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:15:32 +0800
> Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Since the real user scenario does not need COLO to monitor all traffic.
> > Add colo-passthrough-add and colo-passthrough-del to maintain a COLO
> > network passthrough list. Add IPFlowSpec struct for all QMP commands.
> > Except protocol field is necessary, other fields are optional.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > net/net.c | 10 ++++++++
> > qapi/net.json | 68
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
> > index edf9b95418..2a6e5f3886 100644
> > --- a/net/net.c
> > +++ b/net/net.c
> > @@ -1196,6 +1196,16 @@ void qmp_netdev_del(const char *id, Error
> **errp)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +void qmp_colo_passthrough_add(IPFlowSpec *spec, Error **errp) {
> > + /* TODO implement setup passthrough rule */ }
> > +
> > +void qmp_colo_passthrough_del(IPFlowSpec *spec, Error **errp) {
> > + /* TODO implement delete passthrough rule */ }
> > +
> > static void netfilter_print_info(Monitor *mon, NetFilterState *nf) {
> > char *str;
> > diff --git a/qapi/net.json b/qapi/net.json index
> > af3f5b0fda..f6e4e37526 100644
> > --- a/qapi/net.json
> > +++ b/qapi/net.json
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > ##
> >
> > { 'include': 'common.json' }
> > +{ 'include': 'sockets.json' }
> >
> > ##
> > # @set_link:
> > @@ -694,3 +695,70 @@
> > ##
> > { 'event': 'FAILOVER_NEGOTIATED',
> > 'data': {'device-id': 'str'} }
> > +
> > +##
> > +# @IPFlowSpec:
>
> I think something like "@IPFilterRule" is clearer.
>
> > +# IP flow specification.
>
> "IP filter rule specification"
>
> > +# @protocol: Transport layer protocol like TCP/UDP...
> > +#
> > +# @object-name: Point out the IPflow spec effective range of object,
> > +# If there is no such part, it means global spec.
>
> I think IPFlowSpec should be kept generic, so object-name should not be
> part of it. It should move directly to 'colo-passthrough-add' and 'colo-
> passthrough-del'.
>
> Also please use clearer wording. Proposal:
> "@object-name: The id of the colo-compare object to add the filter to."
>
> Again, if other net filters support the new feature in the future, the wording
> can always be changed later.
We already discussed the name of the "IPFlowSpec" in this series V3/V4...
Current definition is a generic one. Both OK for me.
For the qapi/net.json, Hi Markus, which name do you think is better?
>
> > +# @source: Source address and port.
> > +#
> > +# @destination: Destination address and port.
> > +#
> > +# Since: 6.1
> > +##
> > +{ 'struct': 'IPFlowSpec',
> > + 'data': { 'protocol': 'str', '*object-name': 'str',
> > + '*source': 'InetSocketAddressBase',
> > + '*destination': 'InetSocketAddressBase' } }
>
> I think 'protocol' should be made optional too.
Make protocol to optional is easy.
But for most cases, with a protocol is necessary.
If user unexpected input nothing, it will make the entire network unavailable.
Thanks
Chen
>
> > +##
> > +# @colo-passthrough-add:
> > +#
> > +# Add passthrough entry according to user's needs in COLO-compare.
> > +# Source IP/port and destination IP/port both optional, If user just
> > +# input parts of infotmation, it will match all.
> > +#
> > +# Returns: Nothing on success
> > +#
> > +# Since: 6.1
> > +#
> > +# Example:
> > +#
> > +# -> { "execute": "colo-passthrough-add",
> > +# "arguments": { "protocol": "tcp", "object-name": "object0",
> > +# "source": {"host": "192.168.1.1", "port": "1234"},
> > +# "destination": {"host": "192.168.1.2", "port": "4321"} } }
> > +# <- { "return": {} }
> > +#
> > +##
> > +{ 'command': 'colo-passthrough-add', 'boxed': true,
> > + 'data': 'IPFlowSpec' }
> > +
> > +##
> > +# @colo-passthrough-del:
> > +#
> > +# Delete passthrough entry according to user's needs in COLO-compare.
> > +# Source IP/port and destination IP/port both optional, If user just
> > +# input parts of infotmation, it will match all.
> > +#
> > +# Returns: Nothing on success
> > +#
> > +# Since: 6.1
> > +#
> > +# Example:
> > +#
> > +# -> { "execute": "colo-passthrough-del",
> > +# "arguments": { "protocol": "tcp", "object-name": "object0",
> > +# "source": {"host": "192.168.1.1", "port": "1234"},
> > +# "destination": {"host": "192.168.1.2", "port": "4321"} } }
> > +# <- { "return": {} }
> > +#
> > +##
> > +{ 'command': 'colo-passthrough-del', 'boxed': true,
> > + 'data': 'IPFlowSpec' }
>
>
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 15:15 [PATCH V6 0/6] Passthrough specific network traffic in COLO Zhang Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 1/6] qapi/net: Add IPFlowSpec and QMP command for COLO passthrough Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:34 ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20 5:49 ` Zhang, Chen [this message]
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 2/6] util/qemu-sockets.c: Add inet_parse_base to handle InetSocketAddressBase Zhang Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 3/6] hmp-commands: Add new HMP command for COLO passthrough Zhang Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 4/6] net/colo-compare: Move data structure and define to .h file Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:03 ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20 1:50 ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 5/6] net/colo-compare: Add passthrough list to CompareState Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:07 ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20 3:38 ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-20 15:15 ` [PATCH V6 6/6] net/net.c: Add handler for COLO passthrough connection Zhang Chen
2021-05-17 20:38 ` Lukas Straub
2021-05-20 5:50 ` Zhang, Chen
2021-04-28 3:26 ` [PATCH V6 0/6] Passthrough specific network traffic in COLO Zhang, Chen
2021-05-12 7:05 ` Zhang, Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c5dfb900ad3458da2a2885488561ec9@intel.com \
--to=chen.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lukasstraub2@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhangckid@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).