qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Cc: "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Riku Voipio" <riku.voipio@iki.fi>,
	groug@kaod.org, "Laurent Vivier" <laurent@vivier.eu>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	philmd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/19] spapr: Move SpaprIrq::nr_xirqs to SpaprMachineClass
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 18:01:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cc759a5-43ef-a453-82cb-5cd162494e35@kaod.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009060818.29719-17-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On 09/10/2019 08:08, David Gibson wrote:
> For the benefit of peripheral device allocation, the number of available
> irqs really wants to be the same on a given machine type version,
> regardless of what irq backends we are using.  That's the case now, but
> only because we make sure the different SpaprIrq instances have the same
> value except for the special legacy one.
> 
> Since this really only depends on machine type version, move the value to
> SpaprMachineClass instead of SpaprIrq.  This also puts the code to set it
> to the lower value on old machine types right next to setting
> legacy_irq_allocation, which needs to go hand in hand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c             |  2 ++
>  hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c         | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h     |  1 +
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 153cc54354..e1ff03152e 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -4443,6 +4443,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>      smc->irq = &spapr_irq_dual;
>      smc->dr_phb_enabled = true;
>      smc->linux_pci_probe = true;
> +    smc->nr_xirqs = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS;
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo spapr_machine_info = {
> @@ -4578,6 +4579,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_3_0_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
>      compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_3_0, hw_compat_3_0_len);
>  
>      smc->legacy_irq_allocation = true;
> +    smc->nr_xirqs = 0x400;
>      smc->irq = &spapr_irq_xics_legacy;

yes. this is clearly better to this constant at the machine level.

c. 


>  }
>  
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index 076da31501..2768f9a765 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ int spapr_irq_init_kvm(int (*fn)(SpaprInterruptController *, Error **),
>   */
>  
>  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS,
>      .xics        = true,
>      .xive        = false,
>  };
> @@ -116,7 +115,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
>   */
>  
>  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
> -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS,
>      .xics        = false,
>      .xive        = true,
>  };
> @@ -134,7 +132,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
>   * Define values in sync with the XIVE and XICS backend
>   */
>  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_dual = {
> -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS,
>      .xics        = true,
>      .xive        = true,
>  };
> @@ -251,16 +248,19 @@ void spapr_irq_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t nr_servers,
>  
>  uint32_t spapr_irq_nr_msis(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
>  {
> -    if (SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> -        return spapr->irq->nr_xirqs;
> +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> +
> +    if (smc->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> +        return smc->nr_xirqs;
>      } else {
> -        return SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE + spapr->irq->nr_xirqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI;
> +        return SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE + smc->nr_xirqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI;
>      }
>  }
>  
>  void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
>  {
>      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
>  
>      if (machine_kernel_irqchip_split(machine)) {
>          error_setg(errp, "kernel_irqchip split mode not supported on pseries");
> @@ -298,8 +298,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
>              return;
>          }
>  
> -        object_property_set_int(obj, spapr->irq->nr_xirqs, "nr-irqs",
> -                                &local_err);
> +        object_property_set_int(obj, smc->nr_xirqs, "nr-irqs", &local_err);
>          if (local_err) {
>              error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>              return;
> @@ -320,8 +319,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
>          int i;
>  
>          dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_SPAPR_XIVE);
> -        qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "nr-irqs",
> -                             spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> +        qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "nr-irqs", smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
>          /*
>           * 8 XIVE END structures per CPU. One for each available
>           * priority
> @@ -346,17 +344,18 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
>      }
>  
>      spapr->qirqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(spapr_set_irq, spapr,
> -                                      spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> +                                      smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
>  }
>  
>  int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp)
>  {
>      SpaprInterruptController *intcs[] = ALL_INTCS(spapr);
>      int i;
> +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
>      int rc;
>  
>      assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> -    assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> +    assert(irq < (smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intcs); i++) {
>          SpaprInterruptController *intc = intcs[i];
> @@ -376,9 +375,10 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num)
>  {
>      SpaprInterruptController *intcs[] = ALL_INTCS(spapr);
>      int i, j;
> +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
>  
>      assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> -    assert((irq + num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> +    assert((irq + num) <= (smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
>  
>      for (i = irq; i < (irq + num); i++) {
>          for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(intcs); j++) {
> @@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num)
>  
>  qemu_irq spapr_qirq(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq)
>  {
> +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> +
>      /*
>       * This interface is basically for VIO and PHB devices to find the
>       * right qemu_irq to manipulate, so we only allow access to the
> @@ -403,7 +405,7 @@ qemu_irq spapr_qirq(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq)
>       * interfaces, we can change this if we need to in future.
>       */
>      assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> -    assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> +    assert(irq < (smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
>  
>      if (spapr->ics) {
>          assert(ics_valid_irq(spapr->ics, irq));
> @@ -556,10 +558,7 @@ int spapr_irq_find(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int num, bool align, Error **errp)
>      return first + ics->offset;
>  }
>  
> -#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_LEGACY_NR_XIRQS     0x400
> -
>  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics_legacy = {
> -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_LEGACY_NR_XIRQS,
>      .xics        = true,
>      .xive        = false,
>  };
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index 763da757f0..623e8e3f93 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct SpaprMachineClass {
>      bool use_ohci_by_default;  /* use USB-OHCI instead of XHCI */
>      bool pre_2_10_has_unused_icps;
>      bool legacy_irq_allocation;
> +    uint32_t nr_xirqs;
>      bool broken_host_serial_model; /* present real host info to the guest */
>      bool pre_4_1_migration; /* don't migrate hpt-max-page-size */
>      bool linux_pci_probe;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index befe8e01dc..5e150a6679 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ int spapr_irq_msi_alloc(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t num, bool align,
>  void spapr_irq_msi_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, uint32_t num);
>  
>  typedef struct SpaprIrq {
> -    uint32_t    nr_xirqs;
>      bool        xics;
>      bool        xive;
>  } SpaprIrq;
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09  6:07 [PATCH v4 00/19] spapr: IRQ subsystem cleanup David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] xive: Make some device types not user creatable David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] xics: " David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] target/ppc: Fix for optimized vsl/vsr instructions David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] spapr, xics, xive: Introduce SpaprInterruptController QOM interface David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move irq claim and free " David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller David Gibson
2019-10-09  9:16   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09  9:19   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09 11:38     ` David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController David Gibson
2019-10-09  9:18   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move print_info " David Gibson
2019-10-09  9:19   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move dt_populate " David Gibson
2019-10-09  9:20   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] spapr, xics, xive: Match signatures for XICS and XIVE KVM connect routines David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] spapr: Remove SpaprIrq::init_kvm hook David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move SpaprIrq::reset hook logic into activate/deactivate David Gibson
2019-10-09 14:25   ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-09 15:56     ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09 15:56   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] spapr, xics, xive: Move SpaprIrq::post_load hook to backends David Gibson
2019-10-09 15:57   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] spapr: Remove SpaprIrq::nr_msis David Gibson
2019-10-09 15:59   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-10  1:56     ` David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] spapr: Move SpaprIrq::nr_xirqs to SpaprMachineClass David Gibson
2019-10-09 16:01   ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] spapr: Remove last pieces of SpaprIrq David Gibson
2019-10-09 16:44   ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-10-10  1:59     ` David Gibson
2019-10-09 17:02   ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-10  2:02     ` David Gibson
2019-10-10  6:29       ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-10 20:33         ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-11  5:07           ` David Gibson
2019-10-11  6:13             ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-11  8:33               ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-12  0:00               ` David Gibson
2019-10-14  9:15                 ` Greg Kurz
2019-11-20  5:38                   ` David Gibson
2019-11-20  8:36                     ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] spapr: Handle irq backend changes with VFIO PCI devices David Gibson
2019-10-09  8:57   ` David Gibson
2019-10-09  6:08 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] spapr: Work around spurious warnings from vfio INTx initialization David Gibson
2019-10-09  8:37   ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-09  8:52     ` David Gibson
2019-10-09 17:16       ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-10  2:02         ` David Gibson
2019-10-09  9:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] spapr: IRQ subsystem cleanup David Gibson
2019-10-16 16:04 ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-17  0:26   ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5cc759a5-43ef-a453-82cb-5cd162494e35@kaod.org \
    --to=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).