qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] block-copy: improve comments of BlockCopyTask and BlockCopyState types and functions
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e0ac9f6-bb8d-ccdf-04ea-81d88cded4ff@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554f05bf-4ecf-e00e-e50a-ff2450e74b00@virtuozzo.com>



On 19/06/2021 20:31, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 19.06.2021 18:23, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>>   typedef struct BlockCopyTask {
>>>       AioTask task;
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * IN parameters. Initialized in block_copy_task_create()
>>> +     * and never changed.
>>> +     */
>>
>> That's just not true for method field :(
> 
> I think, we just need to document that @method is never accessed 
> concurrently
> 
Ok I got confused in the last patch. Method is read by 
block_copy_task_entry only after it is re-set in 
block_copy_dirty_clusters loop. Sorry for that.

Will leave it as IN and document it better.

Still, moving the lock granularity inside the while loop might not be 
too bad. Not sure though. At this point skip_unallocated can also be an 
atomic, even though I sense that you won't like that :)

Emanuele



  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-21  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14  7:33 [PATCH v4 0/6] block-copy: protect block-copy internal structures Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] block-copy: small refactor in block_copy_task_entry and block_copy_common Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 14:33   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] block-copy: streamline choice of copy_range vs. read/write Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 15:05   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 18:23   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] block-copy: improve comments of BlockCopyTask and BlockCopyState types and functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 15:23   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 18:31     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:13       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2021-06-22  9:20         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  7:59     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:16       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 17:27   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:21     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 18:53   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:28     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] block-copy: move progress_set_remaining in block_copy_task_end Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] block-copy: add a CoMutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 19:34   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] block-copy: atomic .cancelled and .finished fields in BlockCopyCallState Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 20:06   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  9:30     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:56       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22  8:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-22  9:36       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22 10:20         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-22 10:39           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22 20:57             ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-23 10:06             ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e0ac9f6-bb8d-ccdf-04ea-81d88cded4ff@redhat.com \
    --to=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).