qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] block-copy: atomic .cancelled and .finished fields in BlockCopyCallState
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:15:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c06306f6-e154-ec58-44cc-33d48d8ccdff@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcb8849c-bedf-aacc-3831-0239d89af2d6@virtuozzo.com>

On 19/06/21 22:06, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>
>> -    assert(call_state->finished);
>> +    assert(qatomic_load_acquire(&call_state->finished));
> 
> Hmm. Here qatomic_load_acquire protects nothing (assertion will crash if 
> not yet finished anyway). So, caller is double sure that block-copy is 
> finished.

It does.  If it returns true, you still want the load of finished to 
happen before the reads that follow.

Otherwise I agree with your remarks.

Paolo

> Also it's misleading: if we think that it do some protection, we are 
> doing wrong thing: assertions may be simply compiled out, we can't rely 
> on statements inside assert() to be executed.
> 
> So, let's use simple qatomic_read here too.
> 
>>       if (error_is_read) {
>>           *error_is_read = call_state->error_is_read;
>>       } 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-22  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14  7:33 [PATCH v4 0/6] block-copy: protect block-copy internal structures Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] block-copy: small refactor in block_copy_task_entry and block_copy_common Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 14:33   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] block-copy: streamline choice of copy_range vs. read/write Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 15:05   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 18:23   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] block-copy: improve comments of BlockCopyTask and BlockCopyState types and functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 15:23   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 18:31     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:13       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:20         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  7:59     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:16       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 17:27   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:21     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 18:53   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:28     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] block-copy: move progress_set_remaining in block_copy_task_end Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] block-copy: add a CoMutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 19:34   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] block-copy: atomic .cancelled and .finished fields in BlockCopyCallState Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 20:06   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  9:30     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:56       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22  8:15     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-06-22  9:36       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22 10:20         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-22 10:39           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22 20:57             ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-23 10:06             ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c06306f6-e154-ec58-44cc-33d48d8ccdff@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).