From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: "make check-acceptance" takes way too long
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:50:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgnp4b32.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c90ca3d-eaec-d7e8-5941-4deb83b58fd0@redhat.com> (Thomas Huth's message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:56:41 +0100")
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On 20/01/2022 16.13, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 16:12, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> "make check-acceptance" takes way way too long. I just did a run
>>> on an arm-and-aarch64-targets-only debug build and it took over
>>> half an hour, and this despite it skipping or cancelling 26 out
>>> of 58 tests!
>>>
>>> I think that ~10 minutes runtime is reasonable. 30 is not;
>>> ideally no individual test would take more than a minute or so.
>>>
>>> Output saying where the time went. The first two tests take
>>> more than 10 minutes *each*. I think a good start would be to find
>>> a way of testing what they're testing that is less heavyweight.
>>
>> Does anybody have some time to look at this? It makes
>> 'check-acceptance' almost unusable for testing fixes locally...
>
> We could start using the "SPEED" environment variable there, too, just
> like we already do it in the qtests, so that slow tests only get
> executed with SPEED=slow or SPEED=thorough ...?
No objection, but it's no replacement for looking into why these tests
are so slow.
The #1 reason for things being slow is not giving a damn :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-21 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 15:12 "make check-acceptance" takes way too long Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 15:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-30 15:42 ` Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 22:04 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 6:39 ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-31 17:58 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 18:41 ` Alex Bennée
2021-07-31 20:32 ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 22:55 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-08-02 8:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:47 ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 12:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:55 ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 13:00 ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 13:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:25 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:27 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:43 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-01-20 15:13 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-20 15:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-21 7:56 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 10:50 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2022-01-21 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-21 12:23 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-21 12:41 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 15:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-25 9:20 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01 6:31 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 7:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01 9:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 10:27 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 11:17 ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 16:01 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 16:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:47 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:03 ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 19:04 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:35 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 17:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-02-01 11:06 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2022-02-01 15:54 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 5:29 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:59 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-15 18:14 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgnp4b32.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).