Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/riscv: change the api for RVF/RVD fmin/fmax

[Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2740 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:

> From: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com>
>
> The sNaN propagation behavior has been changed since
> cd20cee7 in https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/fpu_helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/fpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/fpu_helper.c
> index 8700516a14c..d62f4709002 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/fpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/fpu_helper.c
> @@ -174,14 +174,18 @@ uint64_t helper_fmin_s(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t
> rs1, uint64_t rs2)
>  {
>      float32 frs1 = check_nanbox_s(rs1);
>      float32 frs2 = check_nanbox_s(rs2);
> -    return nanbox_s(float32_minnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status));
> +    return nanbox_s(env->priv_ver < PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0 ?
> +                    float32_minnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status) :
> +                    float32_minimum_number(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status));
>  }
>
>  uint64_t helper_fmax_s(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t rs1, uint64_t rs2)
>  {
>      float32 frs1 = check_nanbox_s(rs1);
>      float32 frs2 = check_nanbox_s(rs2);
> -    return nanbox_s(float32_maxnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status));
> +    return nanbox_s(env->priv_ver < PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0 ?
> +                    float32_maxnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status) :
> +                    float32_maximum_number(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status));
>  }
>
>  uint64_t helper_fsqrt_s(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t rs1)
> @@ -283,12 +287,16 @@ uint64_t helper_fdiv_d(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t
> frs1, uint64_t frs2)
>
>  uint64_t helper_fmin_d(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t frs1, uint64_t frs2)
>  {
> -    return float64_minnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status);
> +    return env->priv_ver < PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0 ?
> +            float64_minnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status) :
> +            float64_minimum_number(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status);
>  }
>
>  uint64_t helper_fmax_d(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t frs1, uint64_t frs2)
>  {
> -    return float64_maxnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status);
> +    return env->priv_ver < PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0 ?
> +            float64_maxnum(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status) :
> +            float64_maximum_number(frs1, frs2, &env->fp_status);
>  }
>
>  uint64_t helper_fcvt_s_d(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t rs1)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
If we have decided to tie RVF with Privilege spec version for now as
discussed in:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20211015065500.3850513-1-frank.chang@sifive.com/20211015065500.3850513-3-frank.chang@sifive.com/
then I think this patch doesn't require any further changes, right?

Regards,
Frank Chang

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3905 bytes --]