From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net>
Cc: qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Qemu and ARM secure state.
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:11:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA89YQ_vN-JpCeB+L==F5g1hM=CNMBzjaf5c3EHF19NVyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07e63acb-b756-2586-2ba2-b54b837f7fc8@tribudubois.net>
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 13:27, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net> wrote:
> I have a little application that is designed to work on the i.MX6UL processor.
>
> I developed it and tested it on the mcimx6ul-evk platform emulated by Qemu.
>
> This application used to work "flawlessly" on Qemu 5.0.50 and is working on Qemu 6.0.0 (available as a pre-built package on the latest Ubuntu).
>
> But when I try to run the exact same command line on a Qemu version I compile myself from main/latest of github (Qemu 6.1.50), my application fails to start.
>
> So a little background:
>
> My application expects to start in "secure" state and supervisor mode (which is the default state of i.MX6UL when booting barebone [without u-boot]).
>
> From this state the application tries to get to "non secure" / hypervisor mode which imply going to the "secure" / monitor state before being able to drop to "non secure" / hypervisor. To do so is runs a "smc 0" operand (from "secure" / supervisor).
>
> This "smc" instruction is processed "as expected" by Qemu 5.0.50 and Qemu 6.0.0 (getting to "secure" / monitor mode) but on Qemu 6.1.50 (latest from github) it is as if the smc operand was a no-op. It doesn't trigger any exception and the processor just get to the next instruction after the "smc" instruction. So I am a bit puzzled.
>
> Is there something that changed in Qemu (since Qemu 6.0.0) when it comes to the "secure" world/state?
> Is there some additional command line parameters to use (I search in the documentation but without luck) to get secure world behavior ?
> Is it necessary to "adapt" the emulated platform (i.MX6UL/mcimx6ul-evk) in some way (it looks like the "virt" machine with "secure=on" does work for arm platform)?
Could you try doing a bisect to find the QEMU commit that caused
your guest to stop working ?
thanks
-- PMM
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-04 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <07e63acb-b756-2586-2ba2-b54b837f7fc8@tribudubois.net>
2021-11-04 11:11 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2021-11-04 21:11 ` Qemu and ARM secure state Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-06 10:04 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-06 13:04 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-06 18:11 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-08 14:14 ` Alex Bennée
2021-11-08 22:06 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-08 14:50 ` Peter Maydell
2021-11-08 22:09 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-09 10:55 ` Peter Maydell
2021-11-09 19:06 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2021-11-09 19:20 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA89YQ_vN-JpCeB+L==F5g1hM=CNMBzjaf5c3EHF19NVyQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=jcd@tribudubois.net \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).