Re: QAPI sync meeting

[John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2626 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:18 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:

> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:53 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:55:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> > - Any weekday after 13:00 UTC. Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays work
> >> > particularly well for me at the moment.
> >> > - bluejeans and google meeting both work well for me. Open to
> alternatives.
>
> Congratulations, you've just crowned yourself meeting organizer!  Pick a
> date, time, and place, then herd the cats there.
>
>
ACK. Will send out a proper invite.


> I can't do next Friday.  I think we should aim for next week, to give us
> time to coordinate and to prepare.
>
>
ACK


> >> Are you suggesting a 1-off meeting or a regular meeting, or an adhoc
> >> set of meetings ?
> >>
> >>
> > I'm proposing a one-off here just for some initial discussion and
> planning.
> > (We didn't have a QAPI BoF at KVM Forum and I'd like something similar
> > now.) I don't expect we'll really "finish" plotting out a roadmap in a
> > single 60 minute meeting, but it will probably give us good, targeted
> > discussions on the ML to follow. If more meetings are desired to discuss
> > specific topics, I'm not against scheduling them as-needed.
>
> Let's have one now, and then more as needed.
>
> Jumping into the meeting unprepared, then spending half of the alloted
> time listening to people explaining where they want to take QAPI seems
> like a bad use of our time.  Better: write it up and post it, so we can
> all read before we meet.  Do not reply, except perhaps to ask for
> clarification.  Discuss in the meeting.
>
> I can see such posts from Marc-Andre, Kevin, and Daniel.  Some of them
> could use a bit more detail, perhaps.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
Works for me. I can send out a short summary beforehand, too, but I will
want to aggregate them in bullet-list digestible form for the meeting
minutes. I am suggesting a call to begin with so that I can set aside a
time specifically to discuss items with all interested parties ... at a
time when I'm awake. O:-)


> > (I personally don't really mind semi-regular sync-up meetings, like once
> > every other month or something to that effect -- it keeps me motivated
> and
> > on track. I suspect that Markus does not quite feel the same way about
> 'em,
> > so I'm just trying to not sign him up for stuff.)
>
> More regular meetings sit fairly low on my personal wish list.
>
>
O:-) O:-) O:-)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3811 bytes --]