Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 15/30] riscv: hart: Add a "hartid-base" property to RISC-V hart array

[Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:29 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At present each hart's hartid in a RISC-V hart array is assigned
> the same value of its index in the hart array. But for a system
> that has multiple hart arrays, this is not the case any more.
>
> Add a new "hartid-base" property so that hartid number can be
> assigned based on the property value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v5: None
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch to add a "hartid-base" property to RISC-V hart array
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
>  hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c         | 8 +++++---
>  include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> index 9deef869..52ab86a 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>
>  static Property riscv_harts_props[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-harts", RISCVHartArrayState, num_harts, 1),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("hartid-base", RISCVHartArrayState, hartid_base, 0),
>      DEFINE_PROP_STRING("cpu-type", RISCVHartArrayState, cpu_type),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ static void riscv_harts_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
>      cpu_reset(CPU(cpu));
>  }
>
> -static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
> +static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx, uint32_t hartid,
>                                 char *cpu_type, Error **errp)

Do we need to pass hartid, can't we just get it from s here?

>  {
>      Error *err = NULL;
> @@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
>      object_initialize_child(OBJECT(s), "harts[*]", &s->harts[idx],
>                              sizeof(RISCVCPU), cpu_type,
>                              &error_abort, NULL);
> -    s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = idx;
> +    s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = hartid;
>      qemu_register_reset(riscv_harts_cpu_reset, &s->harts[idx]);
>      object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->harts[idx]), true,
>                               "realized", &err);
> @@ -58,12 +59,13 @@ static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
>  static void riscv_harts_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      RISCVHartArrayState *s = RISCV_HART_ARRAY(dev);
> +    uint32_t hartid = s->hartid_base;

I think s->hartid_base can just be used directly, instead of a extra variable.

Alistair

>      int n;
>
>      s->harts = g_new0(RISCVCPU, s->num_harts);
>
>      for (n = 0; n < s->num_harts; n++) {
> -        riscv_hart_realize(s, n, s->cpu_type, errp);
> +        riscv_hart_realize(s, n, hartid + n, s->cpu_type, errp);
>      }
>  }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> index 0671d88..1984e30 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef struct RISCVHartArrayState {
>
>      /*< public >*/
>      uint32_t num_harts;
> +    uint32_t hartid_base;
>      char *cpu_type;
>      RISCVCPU *harts;
>  } RISCVHartArrayState;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>