From: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [GIT PULL for qemu-pseries REPOST] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:03:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2edbfa3-85fe-6998-ce0c-b97898081822@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813141755.GN3947@umbus.fritz.box>
On Tuesday 13 August 2019 07:47 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:00:24PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Monday 12 August 2019 03:38 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:14:39PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>>> Alexey/David,
>>>>
>>>> With the SLOF changes, QEMU cannot resize the RTAS blob. Resizing is
>>>> required for FWNMI support which extends the RTAS blob to include an
>>>> error log upon a machine check.
>>>>
>>>> The check to valid RTAS buffer fails in the guest because the rtas-size
>>>> updated in QEMU is not reflecting in the guest.
>>>>
>>>> Any workaround for this?
>>>
>>> Well, we should still be able to do it, it just means fwnmi would need
>>> a SLOF change. It's an inconvenience, but not really a big deal.
>>
>> Yes. Alexey and I were discussing about the following changes to SLOf:
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/libhvcall/hvcall.S b/lib/libhvcall/hvcall.S
>> index b19f6dbeff2c..880d29a29122 100644
>> --- a/lib/libhvcall/hvcall.S
>> +++ b/lib/libhvcall/hvcall.S
>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ ENTRY(hv_rtas)
>> ori r3,r3,KVMPPC_H_RTAS@l
>> HVCALL
>> blr
>> + .space 2048
>> .globl hv_rtas_size
>> hv_rtas_size:
>> .long . - hv_rtas;
>>
>>
>> But this will statically reserve space for RTAS even when
>> SPAPR_CAP_FWNMI_MCE is OFF.
>
> Sure. We could flag that in the DT somehow, and have SLOF reserve the
> space conditionally.
>
> Or we could just ignore it. 2 kiB is miniscule compared to our minimum
> guest size, and our current RTAS is microscopic compared to PowerVM.
I also think so, 2kiB is miniscule so we can allocate it statically.
Alexey,
Can you please include the above one line fix to SLOF?
>
>
--
Regards,
Aravinda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 2:45 [Qemu-devel] [GIT PULL for qemu-pseries REPOST] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-19 3:19 ` David Gibson
2019-08-05 8:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Aravinda Prasad
2019-08-12 10:08 ` David Gibson
2019-08-13 7:30 ` Aravinda Prasad
2019-08-13 14:17 ` David Gibson
2019-08-14 4:33 ` Aravinda Prasad [this message]
2019-08-23 4:09 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-08-25 1:03 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2edbfa3-85fe-6998-ce0c-b97898081822@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).