* [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/lpc_ich9: Ignore reserved/invalid SCI IRQ
@ 2020-07-17 15:17 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-27 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-07-17 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, qemu-stable, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
Alexander Bulekov, Paolo Bonzini
libFuzzer triggered the following assertion:
cat << EOF | qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
-nographic -monitor none -serial none \
-qtest stdio -d guest_errors -trace pci\*
outl 0xcf8 0x8400f841
outl 0xcfc 0xebed205d
outl 0x5d02 0xedf82049
EOF
pci_cfg_write ICH9-LPC 31:0 @0x41 <- 0xebed205d
hw/pci/pci.c:268: int pci_bus_get_irq_level(PCIBus *, int): Assertion `irq_num < bus->nirq' failed.
This is because ich9_lpc_sci_irq() returns -1 for reserved
(illegal) values, but ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update() considers
it valid and store it in a 8-bit unsigned type. Then the 255
value is used as GSI IRQ, resulting in a PIRQ value of 247,
more than ICH9_LPC_NB_PIRQS (8).
Fix by simply ignoring the invalid access (and reporting it):
pci_cfg_write ICH9-LPC 31:0 @0x41 <- 0xebed205d
ICH9 LPC: SCI IRQ SEL #3 is reserved
pci_cfg_read mch 00:0 @0x0 -> 0x8086
pci_cfg_read mch 00:0 @0x0 -> 0x29c08086
...
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Fixes: 8f242cb724 ("ich9: implement SCI_IRQ_SEL register")
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1878642
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
RFC because I have no idea how to report the error. The LPC is on
Device 31 Function 0. Should it trigger some error to the PCI bridge?
I can't find that info in the ICH9 datasheet.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
include/hw/i386/ich9.h | 1 +
hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 14 +++++++++++---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/i386/ich9.h b/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
index a98d10b252..60483b16cd 100644
--- a/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
+++ b/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ typedef struct ICH9LPCState {
#define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_BASE_ADDRESS_MASK Q35_MASK(32, 15, 7)
#define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_RTE 0x1
#define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_DEFAULT 0x1
+
#define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL 0x44
#define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_ACPI_EN 0x80
#define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK Q35_MASK(8, 2, 0)
diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
index cd6e169d47..5ed28a726c 100644
--- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
+++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "qemu/log.h"
#include "cpu.h"
#include "qapi/visitor.h"
#include "qemu/range.h"
@@ -312,10 +313,12 @@ void ich9_generate_smi(void)
cpu_interrupt(first_cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI);
}
+/* Returns -1 on error, IRQ number on success */
static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
{
- switch (lpc->d.config[ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL] &
- ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK) {
+ uint8_t sel = lpc->d.config[ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL] &
+ ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK;
+ switch (sel) {
case ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_9:
return 9;
case ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_10:
@@ -328,6 +331,8 @@ static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
return 21;
default:
/* reserved */
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "ICH9 LPC: SCI IRQ SEL #%u is reserved\n", sel);
break;
}
return -1;
@@ -450,7 +455,7 @@ ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
{
uint32_t pm_io_base = pci_get_long(lpc->d.config + ICH9_LPC_PMBASE);
uint8_t acpi_cntl = pci_get_long(lpc->d.config + ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL);
- uint8_t new_gsi;
+ int new_gsi;
if (acpi_cntl & ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_ACPI_EN) {
pm_io_base &= ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_BASE_ADDRESS_MASK;
@@ -461,6 +466,9 @@ ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
ich9_pm_iospace_update(&lpc->pm, pm_io_base);
new_gsi = ich9_lpc_sci_irq(lpc);
+ if (new_gsi == -1) {
+ return;
+ }
if (lpc->sci_level && new_gsi != lpc->sci_gsi) {
qemu_set_irq(lpc->pm.irq, 0);
lpc->sci_gsi = new_gsi;
--
2.21.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/lpc_ich9: Ignore reserved/invalid SCI IRQ
2020-07-17 15:17 [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/lpc_ich9: Ignore reserved/invalid SCI IRQ Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-07-27 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-07-27 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel
Cc: Alexander Bulekov, qemu-stable, Michael S. Tsirkin
On 17/07/20 17:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> libFuzzer triggered the following assertion:
>
> cat << EOF | qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
> -nographic -monitor none -serial none \
> -qtest stdio -d guest_errors -trace pci\*
> outl 0xcf8 0x8400f841
> outl 0xcfc 0xebed205d
> outl 0x5d02 0xedf82049
> EOF
> pci_cfg_write ICH9-LPC 31:0 @0x41 <- 0xebed205d
> hw/pci/pci.c:268: int pci_bus_get_irq_level(PCIBus *, int): Assertion `irq_num < bus->nirq' failed.
>
> This is because ich9_lpc_sci_irq() returns -1 for reserved
> (illegal) values, but ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update() considers
> it valid and store it in a 8-bit unsigned type. Then the 255
> value is used as GSI IRQ, resulting in a PIRQ value of 247,
> more than ICH9_LPC_NB_PIRQS (8).
>
> Fix by simply ignoring the invalid access (and reporting it):
>
> pci_cfg_write ICH9-LPC 31:0 @0x41 <- 0xebed205d
> ICH9 LPC: SCI IRQ SEL #3 is reserved
> pci_cfg_read mch 00:0 @0x0 -> 0x8086
> pci_cfg_read mch 00:0 @0x0 -> 0x29c08086
> ...
>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> Fixes: 8f242cb724 ("ich9: implement SCI_IRQ_SEL register")
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1878642
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> RFC because I have no idea how to report the error. The LPC is on
> Device 31 Function 0. Should it trigger some error to the PCI bridge?
> I can't find that info in the ICH9 datasheet.
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
The patch is okay, but anything found by a fuzzer should really have a
qtest testcase.
Paolo
> ---
> include/hw/i386/ich9.h | 1 +
> hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/ich9.h b/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
> index a98d10b252..60483b16cd 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/ich9.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ typedef struct ICH9LPCState {
> #define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_BASE_ADDRESS_MASK Q35_MASK(32, 15, 7)
> #define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_RTE 0x1
> #define ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_DEFAULT 0x1
> +
> #define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL 0x44
> #define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_ACPI_EN 0x80
> #define ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK Q35_MASK(8, 2, 0)
> diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> index cd6e169d47..5ed28a726c 100644
> --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> */
>
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/log.h"
> #include "cpu.h"
> #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> #include "qemu/range.h"
> @@ -312,10 +313,12 @@ void ich9_generate_smi(void)
> cpu_interrupt(first_cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI);
> }
>
> +/* Returns -1 on error, IRQ number on success */
> static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> {
> - switch (lpc->d.config[ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL] &
> - ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK) {
> + uint8_t sel = lpc->d.config[ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL] &
> + ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_SCI_IRQ_SEL_MASK;
> + switch (sel) {
> case ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_9:
> return 9;
> case ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_10:
> @@ -328,6 +331,8 @@ static int ich9_lpc_sci_irq(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> return 21;
> default:
> /* reserved */
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "ICH9 LPC: SCI IRQ SEL #%u is reserved\n", sel);
> break;
> }
> return -1;
> @@ -450,7 +455,7 @@ ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> {
> uint32_t pm_io_base = pci_get_long(lpc->d.config + ICH9_LPC_PMBASE);
> uint8_t acpi_cntl = pci_get_long(lpc->d.config + ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL);
> - uint8_t new_gsi;
> + int new_gsi;
>
> if (acpi_cntl & ICH9_LPC_ACPI_CTRL_ACPI_EN) {
> pm_io_base &= ICH9_LPC_PMBASE_BASE_ADDRESS_MASK;
> @@ -461,6 +466,9 @@ ich9_lpc_pmbase_sci_update(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> ich9_pm_iospace_update(&lpc->pm, pm_io_base);
>
> new_gsi = ich9_lpc_sci_irq(lpc);
> + if (new_gsi == -1) {
> + return;
> + }
> if (lpc->sci_level && new_gsi != lpc->sci_gsi) {
> qemu_set_irq(lpc->pm.irq, 0);
> lpc->sci_gsi = new_gsi;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-27 13:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-17 15:17 [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/lpc_ich9: Ignore reserved/invalid SCI IRQ Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-27 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).