qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 12:52:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efe7e845-2e0f-96ba-7e29-c6ac74db9e2f@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200708185135.46694-3-david@redhat.com>


On 08.07.20 20:51, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's implement the "storage configuration" part of diag260. This diag
> is found under z/VM, to indicate usable chunks of memory tot he guest OS.
> As I don't have access to documentation, I have no clue what the actual
> error cases are, and which other stuff we could eventually query using this
> interface. Somebody with access to documentation should fix this. This
> implementation seems to work with Linux guests just fine.
> 
> The Linux kernel supports diag260 to query the available memory since
> v4.20. Older kernels / kvm-unit-tests will later fail to run in such a VM
> (with maxmem being defined and bigger than the memory size, e.g., "-m
>  2G,maxmem=4G"), just as if support for SCLP storage information is not
> implemented. They will fail to detect the actual initial memory size.
> 
> This interface allows us to expose the maximum ramsize via sclp
> and the initial ramsize via diag260 - without having to mess with the
> memory increment size and having to align the initial memory size to it.
> 
> This is a preparation for memory device support. We'll unlock the
> implementation with a new QEMU machine that supports memory devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

I have not looked into this, so this is purely a question. 

Is there a way to hotplug virtio-mem memory beyond the initial size of 
the memory as specified by the  initial sclp)? then we could avoid doing
this platform specfic diag260?
the only issue I see is when we need to go beyond 4TB due to the page table
upgrade in the kernel. 

FWIW diag 260 is publicly documented. 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-08 18:51 [PATCH RFC 0/5] s390x: initial support for virtio-mem David Hildenbrand
2020-07-08 18:51 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] s390x: move setting of maximum ram size to machine init David Hildenbrand
2020-07-08 18:51 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260 David Hildenbrand
2020-07-09 10:37   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-09 17:54     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10  8:32     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10  8:41       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10  9:19         ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-13 11:54       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-13 12:11         ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-13 12:13           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-09 10:52   ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2020-07-09 18:15     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10  9:17       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10 12:12         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10 15:18           ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-10 15:24             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-10 15:43               ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-10 15:45                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-13  9:12               ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-13 10:27                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-13 11:08                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-15  9:42                     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-15 10:43                       ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-15 11:21                         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-15 11:34                           ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-15 11:42                             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-15 16:14                               ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-15 17:38                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-15 17:51                                   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-20 14:43                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2020-07-20 15:43                                       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-08 18:51 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] s390x: prepare device memory address space David Hildenbrand
2020-07-09 10:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-10  7:46     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-08 18:51 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] s390x: implement virtio-mem-ccw David Hildenbrand
2020-07-09  9:24   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-09  9:26     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-08 18:51 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] s390x: initial support for virtio-mem David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efe7e845-2e0f-96ba-7e29-c6ac74db9e2f@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).