From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix bad unlock balance Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:24:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1383773070-15114-1-git-send-email-aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> (raw) When booting Nokia N900 smartphone with v3.12 + omap2plus_defconfig (LOCKDEP enabled) and CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM enabled, the following BUG is seen during the boot: [ 7.302154] ==================[ 7.307128] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 7.312103] 3.12.0-los.git-2093492-00120-g5e01dc7 #3 Not tainted [ 7.318450] ------------------------------------- [ 7.323425] kworker/u2:1/12 is trying to release lock (&ddata->mutex) at: [ 7.330657] [<c031b760>] acx565akm_enable+0x12c/0x18c [ 7.335998] but there are no more locks to release! Fix by removing the extra mutex_unlock(). Reported-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c index e6d56f7..72fe2a8 100644 --- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev) mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex); r = acx565akm_panel_power_on(dssdev); - mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex); + /* NOTE: acx565akm_panel_power_on() will unlock the mutex. */ if (r) return r; -- 1.8.4.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix bad unlock balance Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 23:24:30 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1383773070-15114-1-git-send-email-aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> (raw) When booting Nokia N900 smartphone with v3.12 + omap2plus_defconfig (LOCKDEP enabled) and CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM enabled, the following BUG is seen during the boot: [ 7.302154] ===================================== [ 7.307128] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 7.312103] 3.12.0-los.git-2093492-00120-g5e01dc7 #3 Not tainted [ 7.318450] ------------------------------------- [ 7.323425] kworker/u2:1/12 is trying to release lock (&ddata->mutex) at: [ 7.330657] [<c031b760>] acx565akm_enable+0x12c/0x18c [ 7.335998] but there are no more locks to release! Fix by removing the extra mutex_unlock(). Reported-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c index e6d56f7..72fe2a8 100644 --- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev) mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex); r = acx565akm_panel_power_on(dssdev); - mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex); + /* NOTE: acx565akm_panel_power_on() will unlock the mutex. */ if (r) return r; -- 1.8.4.2
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 21:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-11-06 21:24 Aaro Koskinen [this message] 2013-11-06 21:24 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix bad unlock balance Aaro Koskinen 2013-11-11 13:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-11-11 13:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-11-11 18:37 ` Aaro Koskinen 2013-11-11 18:37 ` Aaro Koskinen 2013-12-06 12:55 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing unlock in acx565akm_panel_power_on() Wei Yongjun 2013-12-06 12:55 ` Wei Yongjun 2013-12-11 14:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-12-11 14:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-12-30 16:17 [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks Ivaylo Dimitrov 2013-12-30 16:17 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-04 12:51 ` Pavel Machek 2014-01-04 12:51 ` Pavel Machek 2014-01-05 12:58 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-05 12:58 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-05 13:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-05 13:13 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-10 10:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2014-01-10 10:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2014-01-10 10:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2014-01-11 9:39 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-11 9:39 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2014-01-13 10:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2015-12-25 13:29 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2015-12-25 13:29 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2015-12-29 7:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2016-01-01 12:25 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov 2016-01-01 12:25 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1383773070-15114-1-git-send-email-aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \ --to=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \ --cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \ --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.