[PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: PSR also doesn't have link_entry_time on SKL.

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: PSR also doesn't have link_entry_time on SKL.
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:28:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449764904-3229-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)

This bit is also reserved on Skylake. Actually the only
platform that supports this is Haswell, so let's fix
this logic and apply this link entry time only for the
platform that supports it, i.e. Haswell.

This also changes the style to let more clear platform
differences outside the reg write. We would probably catch
this case sooner if separated, or not...

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 14cc2cf..9ccff30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -276,10 +276,11 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	 */
 	uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
 	uint32_t val = 0x0;
-	const uint32_t link_entry_time = EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
+
+	if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+		val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
 
 	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val |
-		   (IS_BROADWELL(dev) ? 0 : link_entry_time) |
 		   max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT |
 		   idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT |
 		   EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
-- 
2.4.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
