All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Instrument PSR parameter for possible quirks with link standby.
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:49:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449823782-2485-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211161939.GC20822@phenom.ffwll.local>

Link standby support has been deprecated with 'commit 89251b177
("drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms.")'

The reason for that is that main link in full off offers more power
savings and some platforms implementations on source side had known
bugs with link standby.

However we don't know all panels out there and we don't fully rely
on the VBT information after the case found with the commit that
made us to deprecate link standby.

So, before enable PSR by default let's instrument the PSR parameter
in a way that we can identify different panels out there that might
require or work better with link standby mode.

It is also useful to say that for backward compatibility I'm not
changing the meaning of this flag. So "0" still means disabled
and "1" means enabled with full support and maximum power savings.

v2: Use positive value instead of negative for different operation mode
    as suggested by Daniel.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |  5 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c  |  7 ++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c    | 13 ++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 24318b7..efe973b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2567,6 +2567,10 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 				enabled = true;
 		}
 	}
+
+	seq_printf(m, "Forcing main link standby: %s\n",
+		   yesno(dev_priv->psr.link_standby));
+
 	seq_printf(m, "HW Enabled & Active bit: %s", yesno(enabled));
 
 	if (!HAS_DDI(dev))
@@ -2587,6 +2591,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 
 		seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
 	}
+
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 5edd393..de086f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -969,6 +969,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
 	unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;
 	bool psr2_support;
 	bool aux_frame_sync;
+	bool link_standby;
 };
 
 enum intel_pch {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
index 835d609..6dd39f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
@@ -126,7 +126,12 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_execlists,
 	"(-1=auto [default], 0=disabled, 1=enabled)");
 
 module_param_named_unsafe(enable_psr, i915.enable_psr, int, 0600);
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_psr, "Enable PSR (default: false)");
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_psr, "Enable PSR "
+		 "(0=disabled [default], 1=link-off maximum power-savings, 2=link-standby mode)"
+		 "In case you needed to force it on standby or disabled, please "
+		 "report PCI device ID, subsystem vendor and subsystem device ID "
+		 "to intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, if your machine needs it. "
+		 "It will then be included in an upcoming module version.");
 
 module_param_named_unsafe(preliminary_hw_support, i915.preliminary_hw_support, int, 0600);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(preliminary_hw_support,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 9ccff30..bcc85fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -225,7 +225,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 		   (aux_clock_divider << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_SHIFT));
 	}
 
-	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, DP_PSR_ENABLE);
+	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
+		drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
+				   DP_PSR_ENABLE | DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE);
+	else
+		drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
+				   DP_PSR_ENABLE);
 }
 
 static void vlv_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
@@ -280,6 +285,9 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
 		val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
 
+	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
+		val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
+
 	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val |
 		   max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT |
 		   idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT |
@@ -763,6 +771,9 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 	dev_priv->psr_mmio_base = IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) ?
 		HSW_EDP_PSR_BASE : BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE;
 
+	if (i915.enable_psr == 2)
+		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = true;
+
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
 	mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
 }
-- 
2.4.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-11 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10 16:28 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: PSR also doesn't have link_entry_time on SKL Rodrigo Vivi
2015-12-10 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Instrument PSR parameter for possible quirks with link standby Rodrigo Vivi
2015-12-11 16:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-11  8:49     ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2015-12-11 19:55       ` [PATCH] " Paulo Zanoni
2015-12-11 21:17         ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-12-10 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Enable PSR by default Rodrigo Vivi
2015-12-11  9:28   ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2015-12-11 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: PSR also doesn't have link_entry_time on SKL Paulo Zanoni
2015-12-11 19:14   ` Vivi, Rodrigo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1449823782-2485-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.