All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roberto.sassu@huawei.com (Roberto Sassu)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 8/9] ima: introduce policy action try_appraise
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:56:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171130105610.15761-9-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130105610.15761-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

According to the Biba integrity models, TCB processes won't be corrupted by
writing non-TCB objects.

Introduce the new policy action try_appraise, so that TCB processes are
allowed to write files regardless of the appraisal status. security.ima
will not be updated. An IMA policy for open() that satisfies the
requirements of the Biba integrity models could be:

appraise uid=0 mask=^MAY_EXEC (check read up)
appraise euid=0 mask=^MAY_EXEC (check read up)
appraise uid=0 mask=^MAY_READ (check read up)
appraise euid=0 mask=^MAY_READ (check read up)
try_appraise uid=0 mask=^MAY_WRITE (update security.ima if possible)
try_appraise euid=0 mask=^MAY_WRITE (update security.ima if possible)

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c   |  4 +++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 security/integrity/integrity.h      |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index ee9897c8d0cc..0f746b8bd965 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 	char *pathbuf = NULL;
 	char filename[NAME_MAX];
 	const char *pathname = NULL;
+	int try_appraise;
 	int rc = -ENOMEM, action, must_appraise;
 	int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX;
 	struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = NULL;
@@ -199,6 +200,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 		return 0;
 
 	must_appraise = action & IMA_APPRAISE;
+	try_appraise = action & IMA_TRY_APPRAISE;
 
 	/*  Is the appraise rule hook specific?  */
 	if (action & IMA_FILE_APPRAISE)
@@ -286,7 +288,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 	inode_unlock(inode);
 	if (((rc && must_appraise) ||
 	    (ima_integrity_model && model_violation)) &&
-	    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
+	    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) && !try_appraise)
 		return -EACCES;
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index cd2289daacee..dd8e4c226089 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ enum {
 	Opt_uid_gt, Opt_euid_gt, Opt_fowner_gt,
 	Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt,
 	Opt_appraise_type, Opt_permit_directio,
-	Opt_pcr
+	Opt_pcr, Opt_try_appraise
 };
 
 static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
 	{Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
 	{Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"},
 	{Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"},
+	{Opt_try_appraise, "try_appraise"},
 	{Opt_err, NULL}
 };
 
@@ -652,11 +653,16 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 			break;
 		case Opt_appraise:
 			ima_log_string(ab, "action", "appraise");
+		case Opt_try_appraise:
+			if (token == Opt_try_appraise)
+				ima_log_string(ab, "action", "try_appraise");
 
 			if (entry->action != UNKNOWN)
 				result = -EINVAL;
 
 			entry->action = APPRAISE;
+			if (token == Opt_try_appraise)
+				entry->flags |= IMA_TRY_APPRAISE;
 			break;
 		case Opt_dont_appraise:
 			ima_log_string(ab, "action", "dont_appraise");
@@ -1039,8 +1045,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_measure));
 	if (entry->action & DONT_MEASURE)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_dont_measure));
-	if (entry->action & APPRAISE)
-		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_appraise));
+	if (entry->action & APPRAISE) {
+		if (entry->flags & IMA_TRY_APPRAISE)
+			seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_try_appraise));
+		else
+			seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_appraise));
+	}
 	if (entry->action & DONT_APPRAISE)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_dont_appraise));
 	if (entry->action & AUDIT)
diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
index d70fd875d62f..86274385f9f4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
+++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #define IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED	0x02000000
 #define IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO	0x04000000
 #define IMA_NEW_FILE		0x08000000
+#define IMA_TRY_APPRAISE	0x10000000
 
 #define IMA_DO_MASK		(IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \
 				 IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 8/9] ima: introduce policy action try_appraise
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:56:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171130105610.15761-9-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130105610.15761-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

According to the Biba integrity models, TCB processes won't be corrupted by
writing non-TCB objects.

Introduce the new policy action try_appraise, so that TCB processes are
allowed to write files regardless of the appraisal status. security.ima
will not be updated. An IMA policy for open() that satisfies the
requirements of the Biba integrity models could be:

appraise uid=0 mask=^MAY_EXEC (check read up)
appraise euid=0 mask=^MAY_EXEC (check read up)
appraise uid=0 mask=^MAY_READ (check read up)
appraise euid=0 mask=^MAY_READ (check read up)
try_appraise uid=0 mask=^MAY_WRITE (update security.ima if possible)
try_appraise euid=0 mask=^MAY_WRITE (update security.ima if possible)

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c   |  4 +++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 security/integrity/integrity.h      |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index ee9897c8d0cc..0f746b8bd965 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 	char *pathbuf = NULL;
 	char filename[NAME_MAX];
 	const char *pathname = NULL;
+	int try_appraise;
 	int rc = -ENOMEM, action, must_appraise;
 	int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX;
 	struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = NULL;
@@ -199,6 +200,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 		return 0;
 
 	must_appraise = action & IMA_APPRAISE;
+	try_appraise = action & IMA_TRY_APPRAISE;
 
 	/*  Is the appraise rule hook specific?  */
 	if (action & IMA_FILE_APPRAISE)
@@ -286,7 +288,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 	inode_unlock(inode);
 	if (((rc && must_appraise) ||
 	    (ima_integrity_model && model_violation)) &&
-	    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
+	    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) && !try_appraise)
 		return -EACCES;
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index cd2289daacee..dd8e4c226089 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ enum {
 	Opt_uid_gt, Opt_euid_gt, Opt_fowner_gt,
 	Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt,
 	Opt_appraise_type, Opt_permit_directio,
-	Opt_pcr
+	Opt_pcr, Opt_try_appraise
 };
 
 static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
 	{Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
 	{Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"},
 	{Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"},
+	{Opt_try_appraise, "try_appraise"},
 	{Opt_err, NULL}
 };
 
@@ -652,11 +653,16 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 			break;
 		case Opt_appraise:
 			ima_log_string(ab, "action", "appraise");
+		case Opt_try_appraise:
+			if (token == Opt_try_appraise)
+				ima_log_string(ab, "action", "try_appraise");
 
 			if (entry->action != UNKNOWN)
 				result = -EINVAL;
 
 			entry->action = APPRAISE;
+			if (token == Opt_try_appraise)
+				entry->flags |= IMA_TRY_APPRAISE;
 			break;
 		case Opt_dont_appraise:
 			ima_log_string(ab, "action", "dont_appraise");
@@ -1039,8 +1045,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_measure));
 	if (entry->action & DONT_MEASURE)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_dont_measure));
-	if (entry->action & APPRAISE)
-		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_appraise));
+	if (entry->action & APPRAISE) {
+		if (entry->flags & IMA_TRY_APPRAISE)
+			seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_try_appraise));
+		else
+			seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_appraise));
+	}
 	if (entry->action & DONT_APPRAISE)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_dont_appraise));
 	if (entry->action & AUDIT)
diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
index d70fd875d62f..86274385f9f4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
+++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #define IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED	0x02000000
 #define IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO	0x04000000
 #define IMA_NEW_FILE		0x08000000
+#define IMA_TRY_APPRAISE	0x10000000
 
 #define IMA_DO_MASK		(IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \
 				 IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-30 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30 10:56 [RFC][PATCH v2 0/9] ima: integrity models for appraised files Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 1/9] ima: pass filename to ima_rdwr_violation_check() Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-12-01 17:38   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-01 17:38     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 2/9] ima: preserve flags in ima_inode_post_setattr() if file must be appraised Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-12-01 16:31   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-01 16:31     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 3/9] ima: preserve iint flags if security.ima update is successful Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-12-01 18:06   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-01 18:06     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 4/9] ima: introduce ima_mk_null_file() Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 5/9] ima: measure/appraise/audit inherited file descriptors Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 6/9] ima: enforce the Biba strict policy on appraised files Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 7/9] ima: enforce the Biba low watermark for objects " Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2017-11-30 10:56   ` [RFC][PATCH v2 8/9] ima: introduce policy action try_appraise Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 9/9] ima: don't measure files with valid appraisal status Roberto Sassu
2017-11-30 10:56   ` Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171130105610.15761-9-roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.