All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:02:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710100217.12866-6-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180710100217.12866-1-jack@suse.cz>

Currently, the audit tree code does not make sure that when a chunk in
inserted into the hash table, it is fully initialized. So in theory (in
practice only on DEC Alpha) a user of RCU lookup could see uninitialized
structure in the hash table and crash. Add appropriate barriers between
initialization of the structure and its insertion into hash table.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/audit_tree.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index a210963bae32..6a01738d1ac2 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
 
 	if (!(chunk->mark.flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED))
 		return;
+	/*
+	 * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+	 * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+	 * audit_tree_lookup().
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!chunk->key);
 	list = chunk_hash(chunk->key);
 	list_add_rcu(&chunk->hash, list);
@@ -199,7 +205,11 @@ struct audit_chunk *audit_tree_lookup(const struct inode *inode)
 	struct audit_chunk *p;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, list, hash) {
-		if (p->key == key) {
+		/*
+		 * We use a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() to make sure
+		 * the chunk we see is fully initialized.
+		 */
+		if (READ_ONCE(p->key) == key) {
 			atomic_long_inc(&p->refs);
 			return p;
 		}
@@ -304,9 +314,15 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
 		list_replace_init(&chunk->owners[j].list, &new->owners[i].list);
 	}
 
-	list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
 	list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
 		owner->root = new;
+	/*
+	 * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+	 * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+	 * audit_tree_lookup().
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
 	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
 	fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
 	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
@@ -368,6 +384,10 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
 		list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
 	}
 	chunk->key = inode_to_key(inode);
+	/*
+	 * Inserting into the hash table has to go last as once we do that RCU
+ 	 * readers can see the chunk.
+	 */
 	insert_hash(chunk);
 	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
@@ -459,7 +479,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
 	p->owner = tree;
 	get_tree(tree);
 	list_add(&p->list, &tree->chunks);
-	list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
 	list_for_each_entry(owner, &chunk->trees, same_root)
 		owner->root = chunk;
 	old->dead = 1;
@@ -467,6 +486,13 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
 		tree->root = chunk;
 		list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+	 * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+	 * audit_tree_lookup().
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
 	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
 	fsnotify_detach_mark(old_entry);
 	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
-- 
2.16.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:02:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710100217.12866-6-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180710100217.12866-1-jack@suse.cz>

Currently, the audit tree code does not make sure that when a chunk in
inserted into the hash table, it is fully initialized. So in theory (in
practice only on DEC Alpha) a user of RCU lookup could see uninitialized
structure in the hash table and crash. Add appropriate barriers between
initialization of the structure and its insertion into hash table.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/audit_tree.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index a210963bae32..6a01738d1ac2 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
 
 	if (!(chunk->mark.flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED))
 		return;
+	/*
+	 * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+	 * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+	 * audit_tree_lookup().
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!chunk->key);
 	list = chunk_hash(chunk->key);
 	list_add_rcu(&chunk->hash, list);
@@ -199,7 +205,11 @@ struct audit_chunk *audit_tree_lookup(const struct inode *inode)
 	struct audit_chunk *p;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, list, hash) {
-		if (p->key == key) {
+		/*
+		 * We use a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() to make sure
+		 * the chunk we see is fully initialized.
+		 */
+		if (READ_ONCE(p->key) == key) {
 			atomic_long_inc(&p->refs);
 			return p;
 		}
@@ -304,9 +314,15 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
 		list_replace_init(&chunk->owners[j].list, &new->owners[i].list);
 	}
 
-	list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
 	list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
 		owner->root = new;
+	/*
+	 * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+	 * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+	 * audit_tree_lookup().
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
 	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
 	fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
 	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
@@ -368,6 +384,10 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
 		list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
 	}
 	chunk->key = inode_to_key(inode);
+	/*
+	 * Inserting into the hash table has to go last as once we do that RCU
+ 	 * readers can see the chunk.
+	 */
 	insert_hash(chunk);
 	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
@@ -459,7 +479,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
 	p->owner = tree;
 	get_tree(tree);
 	list_add(&p->list, &tree->chunks);
-	list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
 	list_for_each_entry(owner, &chunk->trees, same_root)
 		owner->root = chunk;
 	old->dead = 1;
@@ -467,6 +486,13 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
 		tree->root = chunk;
 		list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
+	 * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
+	 * audit_tree_lookup().
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
 	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
 	fsnotify_detach_mark(old_entry);
 	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
-- 
2.16.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-10 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-10 10:02 [PATCH 0/10 v2] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04  9:53     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04  9:53       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 10:00     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 10:00       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-07-10 10:02   ` [PATCH 05/10] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  7:58   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  7:58     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  8:26     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  8:26       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  9:01       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  9:01         ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  9:23         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  9:23           ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  8:57   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  8:57     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 10:48     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 10:48       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-16 15:13       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-16 15:13         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:03     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:03       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:07       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:07         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11 14:17   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 14:17     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-27  4:47     ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:11     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:11       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 11/10 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180710100217.12866-6-jack@suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.