All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	lenb@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI/PPTT: Modify node flag detection to find last IDENTICAL
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:09:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190615010910.33921-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190615010910.33921-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>

The ACPI specification implies that the IDENTICAL flag should be
set on all non leaf nodes where the children are identical.
This means that we need to be searching for the last node with
the identical flag set rather than the first one.

Since this flag is also dependent on the table revision, we
need to add a bit of extra code to verify the table revision,
and the next node's state in the traversal. Since we want to
avoid function pointers here, lets just special case
the IDENTICAL flag.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
index b72e6afaa8fb..05344413f199 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -432,17 +432,40 @@ static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
 	}
 }
 
+static bool flag_identical(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+			   struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu)
+{
+	struct acpi_pptt_processor *next;
+
+	/* heterogeneous machines must use PPTT revision > 1 */
+	if (table_hdr->revision < 2)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Locate the last node in the tree with IDENTICAL set */
+	if (cpu->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) {
+		next = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
+		if (!(next && next->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL))
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* Passing level values greater than this will result in search termination */
 #define PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE 0xFF
 
-static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
-								  struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
-								  int level, int flag)
+static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+							   struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
+							   int level, int flag)
 {
 	struct acpi_pptt_processor *prev_node;
 
 	while (cpu && level) {
-		if (cpu->flags & flag)
+		/* special case the identical flag to find last identical */
+		if (flag == ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) {
+			if (flag_identical(table_hdr, cpu))
+				break;
+		} else if (cpu->flags & flag)
 			break;
 		pr_debug("level %d\n", level);
 		prev_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
@@ -480,8 +503,8 @@ static int topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table,
 
 	cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
 	if (cpu_node) {
-		cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_package_id(table, cpu_node,
-							  level, flag);
+		cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_tag(table, cpu_node,
+						   level, flag);
 		/*
 		 * As per specification if the processor structure represents
 		 * an actual processor, then ACPI processor ID must be valid.
-- 
2.21.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	lenb@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI/PPTT: Modify node flag detection to find last IDENTICAL
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:09:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190615010910.33921-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190615010910.33921-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>

The ACPI specification implies that the IDENTICAL flag should be
set on all non leaf nodes where the children are identical.
This means that we need to be searching for the last node with
the identical flag set rather than the first one.

Since this flag is also dependent on the table revision, we
need to add a bit of extra code to verify the table revision,
and the next node's state in the traversal. Since we want to
avoid function pointers here, lets just special case
the IDENTICAL flag.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
index b72e6afaa8fb..05344413f199 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -432,17 +432,40 @@ static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
 	}
 }
 
+static bool flag_identical(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+			   struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu)
+{
+	struct acpi_pptt_processor *next;
+
+	/* heterogeneous machines must use PPTT revision > 1 */
+	if (table_hdr->revision < 2)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Locate the last node in the tree with IDENTICAL set */
+	if (cpu->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) {
+		next = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
+		if (!(next && next->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL))
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* Passing level values greater than this will result in search termination */
 #define PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE 0xFF
 
-static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
-								  struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
-								  int level, int flag)
+static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+							   struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
+							   int level, int flag)
 {
 	struct acpi_pptt_processor *prev_node;
 
 	while (cpu && level) {
-		if (cpu->flags & flag)
+		/* special case the identical flag to find last identical */
+		if (flag == ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) {
+			if (flag_identical(table_hdr, cpu))
+				break;
+		} else if (cpu->flags & flag)
 			break;
 		pr_debug("level %d\n", level);
 		prev_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
@@ -480,8 +503,8 @@ static int topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table,
 
 	cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
 	if (cpu_node) {
-		cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_package_id(table, cpu_node,
-							  level, flag);
+		cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_tag(table, cpu_node,
+						   level, flag);
 		/*
 		 * As per specification if the processor structure represents
 		 * an actual processor, then ACPI processor ID must be valid.
-- 
2.21.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-15  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-15  1:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: SPE ACPI enablement Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2019-06-15  1:09   ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI/PPTT: Modify node flag detection to find last IDENTICAL Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI/PPTT: Add function to return ACPI 6.3 Identical tokens Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm_pmu: acpi: spe: Add initial MADT/SPE probing Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-18 17:05   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-18 17:05     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-18 17:36   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-18 17:36     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-18 18:37     ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-18 18:37       ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: arm_spe: Enable ACPI/Platform automatic module loading Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-17  8:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: SPE ACPI enablement Hanjun Guo
2019-06-17  8:36   ` Hanjun Guo
2019-06-18 16:42 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-18 16:42   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190615010910.33921-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --to=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.