From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@aol.com> Cc: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/24] erofs: add super block operations Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 05:05:53 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190721040547.GF17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <161cffc4-1d61-5dc6-45df-f1779ef03b0f@aol.com> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:08:42AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > It is for debugging use as you said below, mainly for our internal > testers whose jobs are > to read kmsg logs and catch kernel problems. sb->s_id (device number) > maybe not > straight-forward for them compared with dev_name... Huh? ->s_id is something like "sdb7" - it's bdev_name(), not a device number... > The initial purpose of erofs_mount_private was to passing multi private > data from erofs_mount > to erofs_read_super, which was written before fs_contest was introduced. That has nothing to do with fs_context (well, other than fs_context conversions affecting the code very close to that). > I agree with you, it seems better to just use s_id in community and > delete erofs_mount_private stuffs... > Yet I don't look into how to use new fs_context, could I keep using > legacy mount interface and fix them all? Sure. > I guess if I don't misunderstand, that is another suggestion -- in > short, leave all destructors to .kill_sb() and > cleanup fill_super(). Just be careful with that iput() there - AFAICS, if fs went live (i.e. if ->s_root is non-NULL), you really need it done only from put_super(); OTOH, for the case of NULL ->s_root ->put_super() won't be called at all, so in that case you need it directly in ->kill_sb().
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk (Al Viro) Subject: [PATCH v2 03/24] erofs: add super block operations Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 05:05:53 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190721040547.GF17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <161cffc4-1d61-5dc6-45df-f1779ef03b0f@aol.com> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019@11:08:42AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > It is for debugging use as you said below, mainly for our internal > testers whose jobs are > to read kmsg logs and catch kernel problems. sb->s_id (device number) > maybe not > straight-forward for them compared with dev_name... Huh? ->s_id is something like "sdb7" - it's bdev_name(), not a device number... > The initial purpose of erofs_mount_private was to passing multi private > data from erofs_mount > to erofs_read_super, which was written before fs_contest was introduced. That has nothing to do with fs_context (well, other than fs_context conversions affecting the code very close to that). > I agree with you, it seems better to just use s_id in community and > delete erofs_mount_private stuffs... > Yet I don't look into how to use new fs_context, could I keep using > legacy mount interface and fix them all? Sure. > I guess if I don't misunderstand, that is another suggestion -- in > short, leave all destructors to .kill_sb() and > cleanup fill_super(). Just be careful with that iput() there - AFAICS, if fs went live (i.e. if ->s_root is non-NULL), you really need it done only from put_super(); OTOH, for the case of NULL ->s_root ->put_super() won't be called at all, so in that case you need it directly in ->kill_sb().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-21 4:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-07-11 14:57 [PATCH v2 00/24] erofs: promote erofs from staging Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] erofs: add on-disk layout Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] erofs: add erofs in-memory stuffs Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] erofs: add super block operations Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-20 22:49 ` Al Viro 2019-07-20 22:49 ` Al Viro 2019-07-21 3:08 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-21 3:08 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-21 4:05 ` Al Viro [this message] 2019-07-21 4:05 ` Al Viro 2019-07-21 4:12 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-21 4:12 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-21 18:05 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-21 18:05 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] erofs: add raw address_space operations Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] erofs: add inode operations Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] erofs: support special inode Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] erofs: add directory operations Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] erofs: add namei functions Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] erofs: support tracepoint Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] erofs: update Kconfig and Makefile Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] erofs: introduce xattr & posixacl support Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] erofs: introduce tagged pointer Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] erofs: add compression indexes support Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] erofs: introduce superblock registration Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] erofs: introduce erofs shrinker Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] erofs: introduce workstation for decompression Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] erofs: introduce per-CPU buffers implementation Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] erofs: introduce pagevec for decompression subsystem Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] erofs: add erofs_allocpage() Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] erofs: introduce generic decompression backend Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] erofs: introduce LZ4 decompression inplace Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] erofs: introduce the decompression frontend Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] erofs: introduce cached decompression Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] erofs: add document Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-11 14:57 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-14 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] erofs: promote erofs from staging Pavel Machek 2019-07-14 10:49 ` Pavel Machek 2019-07-14 10:49 ` Pavel Machek 2019-07-14 20:17 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-14 20:17 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-15 7:56 ` Pavel Machek 2019-07-15 7:56 ` Pavel Machek 2019-07-15 7:56 ` Pavel Machek 2019-07-15 8:37 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-15 8:37 ` Gao Xiang 2019-07-15 8:37 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190721040547.GF17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \ --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \ --cc=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hsiangkao@aol.com \ --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=tytso@mit.edu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.