From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/6] arm: selftest: Split variable output data from test name Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:42:25 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190927104227.253466-5-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190927104227.253466-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> For some tests we mix variable diagnostic output with the test name, which leads to variable test line, confusing some higher level frameworks. Split the output to always use the same test name for a certain test, and put diagnostic output on a separate line using the INFO: tag. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> --- arm/selftest.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arm/selftest.c b/arm/selftest.c index 28a17f7..a0c1ab8 100644 --- a/arm/selftest.c +++ b/arm/selftest.c @@ -43,13 +43,16 @@ static void check_setup(int argc, char **argv) phys_addr_t memsize = PHYS_END - PHYS_OFFSET; phys_addr_t expected = ((phys_addr_t)val)*1024*1024; - report("size = %" PRIu64 " MB", memsize == expected, - memsize/1024/1024); + report("memory size matches expectation", + memsize == expected); + report_info("found %" PRIu64 " MB", memsize/1024/1024); ++nr_tests; } else if (strcmp(argv[i], "smp") == 0) { - report("nr_cpus = %d", nr_cpus == (int)val, nr_cpus); + report("number of CPUs matches expectation", + nr_cpus == (int)val); + report_info("found %d CPUs", nr_cpus); ++nr_tests; } -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/6] arm: selftest: Split variable output data from test name Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:42:25 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190927104227.253466-5-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190927104227.253466-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> For some tests we mix variable diagnostic output with the test name, which leads to variable test line, confusing some higher level frameworks. Split the output to always use the same test name for a certain test, and put diagnostic output on a separate line using the INFO: tag. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> --- arm/selftest.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arm/selftest.c b/arm/selftest.c index 28a17f7..a0c1ab8 100644 --- a/arm/selftest.c +++ b/arm/selftest.c @@ -43,13 +43,16 @@ static void check_setup(int argc, char **argv) phys_addr_t memsize = PHYS_END - PHYS_OFFSET; phys_addr_t expected = ((phys_addr_t)val)*1024*1024; - report("size = %" PRIu64 " MB", memsize == expected, - memsize/1024/1024); + report("memory size matches expectation", + memsize == expected); + report_info("found %" PRIu64 " MB", memsize/1024/1024); ++nr_tests; } else if (strcmp(argv[i], "smp") == 0) { - report("nr_cpus = %d", nr_cpus == (int)val, nr_cpus); + report("number of CPUs matches expectation", + nr_cpus == (int)val); + report_info("found %d CPUs", nr_cpus); ++nr_tests; } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-27 10:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-27 10:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/6] arm: Use stable test output lines Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/6] arm: gic: check_acked: add test description Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:18 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:18 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:40 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:40 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:55 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:55 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 10:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/6] arm: gic: Split variable output data from test name Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:25 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:25 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 10:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/6] arm: timer: " Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:25 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:25 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara [this message] 2019-09-27 10:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/6] arm: selftest: " Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:26 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:26 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 10:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/6] arm: selftest: Make MPIDR output stable Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:30 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:30 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 10:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/6] arm: Add missing test name prefix calls Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 10:42 ` Andre Przywara 2019-09-27 12:31 ` Andrew Jones 2019-09-27 12:31 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190927104227.253466-5-andre.przywara@arm.com \ --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.