From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com Cc: loic.pallardy@st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:24:57 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200424202505.29562-5-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200424202505.29562-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Other than one has to be done after the other, there is no correlation between memory translation and DT parsing. As move function stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations() to stm32_rproc_probe() so that stm32_rproc_parse_dt() can be extended to look for synchronisation related binding in a clean way. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c index 57a426ea620b..658439d4b00a 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, *auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot"); - return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata); + return 0; } static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -634,6 +634,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) goto free_rproc; + ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata); + if (ret) + goto free_rproc; + rproc->auto_boot = auto_boot; rproc->has_iommu = false; ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev)); -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com Cc: loic.pallardy@st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:24:57 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200424202505.29562-5-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200424202505.29562-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Other than one has to be done after the other, there is no correlation between memory translation and DT parsing. As move function stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations() to stm32_rproc_probe() so that stm32_rproc_parse_dt() can be extended to look for synchronisation related binding in a clean way. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c index 57a426ea620b..658439d4b00a 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, *auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot"); - return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata); + return 0; } static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -634,6 +634,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) goto free_rproc; + ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata); + if (ret) + goto free_rproc; + rproc->auto_boot = auto_boot; rproc->has_iommu = false; ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev)); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 20:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-24 20:24 [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising with M4 Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-29 13:37 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-29 13:37 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-30 20:58 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-30 20:58 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message] 2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation " Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] remoteproc: stm32: Get coprocessor state Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-29 13:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-29 13:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-05-01 17:40 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-01 17:40 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] remoteproc: stm32: Get loaded resource table for synchronisation Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new start ops " Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-29 14:50 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-29 14:50 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop() Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-29 14:52 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-29 14:52 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new parse fw ops for synchronisation Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 5:13 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 5:13 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new loaded rsc " Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-14 5:15 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-05-14 5:15 ` Bjorn Andersson 2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] remoteproc: stm32: Set synchronisation state machine if needed Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-29 14:47 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-29 14:47 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-05-01 17:54 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-01 17:54 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-04-29 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising with M4 Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-04-29 15:08 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2020-05-01 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier 2020-05-01 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200424202505.29562-5-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \ --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \ --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \ --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \ --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \ --cc=ohad@wizery.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.