All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
To: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, erichte@linux.ibm.com,
	nayna@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, eric.snowberg@oracle.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:51:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901165143.10295-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> (raw)

The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
Boot enabled.  The dbx is capable of containing any number of
EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID, EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID, and EFI_CERT_X509_GUID
entries.

Currently when EFI_CERT_X509_GUID are contained in the dbx, the entries are
skipped.

This change adds support for EFI_CERT_X509_GUID dbx entries. When a
EFI_CERT_X509_GUID is found, it is added as an asymmetrical key to the
.blacklist keyring.  Anytime the .platform keyring is used, the keys in
the .blacklist keyring are referenced, if a matching key is found, the
key will be rejected.

Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
---
 certs/blacklist.c                             | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 certs/system_keyring.c                        |  6 ++++
 include/keys/system_keyring.h                 | 11 ++++++
 .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c          | 11 ++++++
 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 6514f9ebc943..17ebf50cf0ae 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
+#include <crypto/pkcs7.h>
 #include "blacklist.h"
 
 static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
@@ -100,6 +101,41 @@ int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int mark_key_revocationlisted(const char *data, size_t size)
+{
+	key_ref_t key;
+
+	key = key_create_or_update(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true),
+				   "asymmetric",
+				   NULL,
+				   data,
+				   size,
+				   ((KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
+				    KEY_USR_VIEW),
+				   KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
+				   KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
+		pr_err("Problem with revocation key (%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(key));
+		return PTR_ERR(key);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int is_key_revocationlisted(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, blacklist_keyring);
+
+	if (ret = 0)
+		return -EKEYREJECTED;
+
+	return -ENOKEY;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_key_revocationlisted);
+
 /**
  * is_hash_blacklisted - Determine if a hash is blacklisted
  * @hash: The hash to be checked as a binary blob
diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c
index 798291177186..f8ea96219155 100644
--- a/certs/system_keyring.c
+++ b/certs/system_keyring.c
@@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t len,
 			pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform keyring is not available\n");
 			goto error;
 		}
+
+		ret = is_key_revocationlisted(pkcs7);
+		if (ret != -ENOKEY) {
+			pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform key revocationlisted\n");
+			goto error;
+		}
 	}
 	ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys);
 	if (ret < 0) {
diff --git a/include/keys/system_keyring.h b/include/keys/system_keyring.h
index fb8b07daa9d1..b6991cfe1b6d 100644
--- a/include/keys/system_keyring.h
+++ b/include/keys/system_keyring.h
@@ -31,11 +31,14 @@ extern int restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted(
 #define restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted restrict_link_by_builtin_trusted
 #endif
 
+extern struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
 extern int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash);
+extern int mark_key_revocationlisted(const char *data, size_t size);
 extern int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
 			       const char *type);
 extern int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len);
+extern int is_key_revocationlisted(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7);
 #else
 static inline int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
 				      const char *type)
@@ -47,6 +50,14 @@ static inline int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline int mark_key_revocationlisted(const char *data, size_t size)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+static inline int is_key_revocationlisted(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7)
+{
+	return -ENOKEY;
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
index c5ba695c10e3..cc5a43804bc4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
+++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
@@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ static __init void uefi_blacklist_binary(const char *source,
 	uefi_blacklist_hash(source, data, len, "bin:", 4);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Revocationlist the X509 cert
+ */
+static __init void uefi_revocationlist_x509(const char *source,
+					    const void *data, size_t len)
+{
+	mark_key_revocationlisted(data, len);
+}
+
 /*
  * Return the appropriate handler for particular signature list types found in
  * the UEFI db and MokListRT tables.
@@ -76,5 +85,7 @@ __init efi_element_handler_t get_handler_for_dbx(const efi_guid_t *sig_type)
 		return uefi_blacklist_x509_tbs;
 	if (efi_guidcmp(*sig_type, efi_cert_sha256_guid) = 0)
 		return uefi_blacklist_binary;
+	if (efi_guidcmp(*sig_type, efi_cert_x509_guid) = 0)
+		return uefi_revocationlist_x509;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.18.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
To: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, erichte@linux.ibm.com,
	nayna@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, eric.snowberg@oracle.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries
Date: Tue,  1 Sep 2020 12:51:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901165143.10295-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> (raw)

The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
Boot enabled.  The dbx is capable of containing any number of
EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID, EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID, and EFI_CERT_X509_GUID
entries.

Currently when EFI_CERT_X509_GUID are contained in the dbx, the entries are
skipped.

This change adds support for EFI_CERT_X509_GUID dbx entries. When a
EFI_CERT_X509_GUID is found, it is added as an asymmetrical key to the
.blacklist keyring.  Anytime the .platform keyring is used, the keys in
the .blacklist keyring are referenced, if a matching key is found, the
key will be rejected.

Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
---
 certs/blacklist.c                             | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 certs/system_keyring.c                        |  6 ++++
 include/keys/system_keyring.h                 | 11 ++++++
 .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c          | 11 ++++++
 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 6514f9ebc943..17ebf50cf0ae 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
+#include <crypto/pkcs7.h>
 #include "blacklist.h"
 
 static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
@@ -100,6 +101,41 @@ int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int mark_key_revocationlisted(const char *data, size_t size)
+{
+	key_ref_t key;
+
+	key = key_create_or_update(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true),
+				   "asymmetric",
+				   NULL,
+				   data,
+				   size,
+				   ((KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
+				    KEY_USR_VIEW),
+				   KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
+				   KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
+		pr_err("Problem with revocation key (%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(key));
+		return PTR_ERR(key);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int is_key_revocationlisted(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, blacklist_keyring);
+
+	if (ret == 0)
+		return -EKEYREJECTED;
+
+	return -ENOKEY;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_key_revocationlisted);
+
 /**
  * is_hash_blacklisted - Determine if a hash is blacklisted
  * @hash: The hash to be checked as a binary blob
diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c
index 798291177186..f8ea96219155 100644
--- a/certs/system_keyring.c
+++ b/certs/system_keyring.c
@@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t len,
 			pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform keyring is not available\n");
 			goto error;
 		}
+
+		ret = is_key_revocationlisted(pkcs7);
+		if (ret != -ENOKEY) {
+			pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform key revocationlisted\n");
+			goto error;
+		}
 	}
 	ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys);
 	if (ret < 0) {
diff --git a/include/keys/system_keyring.h b/include/keys/system_keyring.h
index fb8b07daa9d1..b6991cfe1b6d 100644
--- a/include/keys/system_keyring.h
+++ b/include/keys/system_keyring.h
@@ -31,11 +31,14 @@ extern int restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted(
 #define restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted restrict_link_by_builtin_trusted
 #endif
 
+extern struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
 extern int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash);
+extern int mark_key_revocationlisted(const char *data, size_t size);
 extern int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
 			       const char *type);
 extern int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len);
+extern int is_key_revocationlisted(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7);
 #else
 static inline int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
 				      const char *type)
@@ -47,6 +50,14 @@ static inline int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline int mark_key_revocationlisted(const char *data, size_t size)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+static inline int is_key_revocationlisted(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7)
+{
+	return -ENOKEY;
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
index c5ba695c10e3..cc5a43804bc4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
+++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
@@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ static __init void uefi_blacklist_binary(const char *source,
 	uefi_blacklist_hash(source, data, len, "bin:", 4);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Revocationlist the X509 cert
+ */
+static __init void uefi_revocationlist_x509(const char *source,
+					    const void *data, size_t len)
+{
+	mark_key_revocationlisted(data, len);
+}
+
 /*
  * Return the appropriate handler for particular signature list types found in
  * the UEFI db and MokListRT tables.
@@ -76,5 +85,7 @@ __init efi_element_handler_t get_handler_for_dbx(const efi_guid_t *sig_type)
 		return uefi_blacklist_x509_tbs;
 	if (efi_guidcmp(*sig_type, efi_cert_sha256_guid) == 0)
 		return uefi_blacklist_binary;
+	if (efi_guidcmp(*sig_type, efi_cert_x509_guid) == 0)
+		return uefi_revocationlist_x509;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.18.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01 16:51 Eric Snowberg [this message]
2020-09-01 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries Eric Snowberg
2020-09-02  0:11 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-04 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries] Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-04 12:59   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-04 23:20   ` Eric Snowberg
2020-09-04 23:20     ` Eric Snowberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200901165143.10295-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --to=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=erichte@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.