All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914204440.969090025@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de

ARCH_NO_PREEMPT disables the selection of CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and
CONFIG_PREEMPT, but architectures which set this config option still
support preempt count for hard and softirq accounting.

There is absolutely no reason to prevent lockdep from using the preempt
counter nor is there a reason to prevent the enablement of
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP on such architectures.

Remove the dependencies, which affects ALPHA, HEXAGON, M68K and UM.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
 	select DEBUG_RWSEMS
 	select DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
 	select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	select PREEMPT_COUNT if !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	default n
 	help
@@ -1323,7 +1323,6 @@ config DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	bool "Sleep inside atomic section checking"
 	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
-	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
 	  noisy if they are called inside atomic sections: when a spinlock is



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914204440.969090025@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de

ARCH_NO_PREEMPT disables the selection of CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and
CONFIG_PREEMPT, but architectures which set this config option still
support preempt count for hard and softirq accounting.

There is absolutely no reason to prevent lockdep from using the preempt
counter nor is there a reason to prevent the enablement of
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP on such architectures.

Remove the dependencies, which affects ALPHA, HEXAGON, M68K and UM.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
 	select DEBUG_RWSEMS
 	select DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
 	select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	select PREEMPT_COUNT if !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	default n
 	help
@@ -1323,7 +1323,6 @@ config DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	bool "Sleep inside atomic section checking"
 	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
-	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
 	  noisy if they are called inside atomic sections: when a spinlock is


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914204440.969090025@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de

ARCH_NO_PREEMPT disables the selection of CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and
CONFIG_PREEMPT, but architectures which set this config option still
support preempt count for hard and softirq accounting.

There is absolutely no reason to prevent lockdep from using the preempt
counter nor is there a reason to prevent the enablement of
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP on such architectures.

Remove the dependencies, which affects ALPHA, HEXAGON, M68K and UM.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
 	select DEBUG_RWSEMS
 	select DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
 	select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	select PREEMPT_COUNT if !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	default n
 	help
@@ -1323,7 +1323,6 @@ config DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	bool "Sleep inside atomic section checking"
 	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
-	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
 	  noisy if they are called inside atomic sections: when a spinlock is

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914204440.969090025@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de

ARCH_NO_PREEMPT disables the selection of CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and
CONFIG_PREEMPT, but architectures which set this config option still
support preempt count for hard and softirq accounting.

There is absolutely no reason to prevent lockdep from using the preempt
counter nor is there a reason to prevent the enablement of
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP on such architectures.

Remove the dependencies, which affects ALPHA, HEXAGON, M68K and UM.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
 	select DEBUG_RWSEMS
 	select DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
 	select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	select PREEMPT_COUNT if !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	default n
 	help
@@ -1323,7 +1323,6 @@ config DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	bool "Sleep inside atomic section checking"
 	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
-	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
 	  noisy if they are called inside atomic sections: when a spinlock is

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Valentin
Subject: [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914204440.969090025@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de

ARCH_NO_PREEMPT disables the selection of CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and
CONFIG_PREEMPT, but architectures which set this config option still
support preempt count for hard and softirq accounting.

There is absolutely no reason to prevent lockdep from using the preempt
counter nor is there a reason to prevent the enablement of
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP on such architectures.

Remove the dependencies, which affects ALPHA, HEXAGON, M68K and UM.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
 	select DEBUG_RWSEMS
 	select DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
 	select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	select PREEMPT_COUNT if !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	default n
 	help
@@ -1323,7 +1323,6 @@ config DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	bool "Sleep inside atomic section checking"
 	select PREEMPT_COUNT
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
-	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	help
 	  If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
 	  noisy if they are called inside atomic sections: when a spinlock is

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 282+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 20:42 [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 02/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 03/13] preempt: Clenaup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 10:56   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 04/13] lockdep: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 16:11   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 05/13] mm/pagemap: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  0:52   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15  0:52     ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15  2:40   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15  5:28   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 06/13] locking/bitspinlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 16:10   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 07/13] uaccess: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 08/13] sched: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 10:56   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 09/13] ARM: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 10/13] xtensa: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 11/13] drm/i915: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 12/13] rcutorture: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 13/13] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_COUNT from Kconfig Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:54 ` [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 21:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 22:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24       ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37         ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  3:21         ` [PATCH] crypto: lib/chacha20poly1305 - Set SG_MITER_ATOMIC unconditionally Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` [Intel-gfx] " Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:30         ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:03           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:40             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:45           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  7:05               ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  7:10                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  9:34                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 10:02                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 10:05                     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 10:08                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 10:10                         ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 19:04                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  7:08               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20         ` [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:22           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` [Intel-gfx] " Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:39             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  7:24               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  7:24                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  7:24                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 17:29                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  8:39       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 17:35         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 19:57           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 18:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16  7:37           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 15:29             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 18:32               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 20:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17  6:38                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-16 20:29               ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:58                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 21:43                   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 22:39                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17  7:52                       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 16:28                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-29  8:19                     ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  9:00                       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 14:54                         ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-16 19:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 20:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-14 22:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200914204440.969090025@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.