All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:50:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201030165045.5000-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030165045.5000-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Give names to the SSKPD/MLTR fields, and use the
REG_GENMASK* and REG_FIELD_GET*.

Also drop the bogus non-mirrored SSKP register define.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index d8bf85db633d..249bf17bcf9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -3818,8 +3818,17 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
 #define   MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT		0
 #define   MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_MASK		(0xff << MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT)
 
-/* snb MCH registers for priority tuning */
 #define MCH_SSKPD			_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5d10)
+#define   SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW	REG_GENMASK64(63, 56)
+#define   SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(40, 32)
+#define   SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(28, 20)
+#define   SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(19, 12)
+#define   SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(11, 4)
+#define   SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW	REG_GENMASK64(3, 0)
+#define   SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
+#define   SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(21, 16)
+#define   SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
+#define   SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
 
 /* Clocking configuration register */
 #define CLKCFG			_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0xc00)
@@ -6496,19 +6505,9 @@ enum {
 
 /* Memory latency timer register */
 #define MLTR_ILK		_MMIO(0x11222)
-#define  MLTR_WM1_SHIFT		0
-#define  MLTR_WM2_SHIFT		8
 /* the unit of memory self-refresh latency time is 0.5us */
-#define  ILK_SRLT_MASK		0x3f
-
-
-/* the address where we get all kinds of latency value */
-#define SSKPD			_MMIO(0x5d10)
-#define SSKPD_WM_MASK		0x3f
-#define SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT		0
-#define SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT		8
-#define SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT		16
-#define SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT		24
+#define  MLTR_WM2_MASK		REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
+#define  MLTR_WM1_MASK		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
 
 /*
  * The two pipe frame counter registers are not synchronized, so
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index d4cbc16441d7..f29fac94c935 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2933,27 +2933,27 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
 		u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
 
-		wm[0] = (sskpd >> 56) & 0xFF;
+		wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
 		if (wm[0] == 0)
-			wm[0] = sskpd & 0xF;
-		wm[1] = (sskpd >> 4) & 0xFF;
-		wm[2] = (sskpd >> 12) & 0xFF;
-		wm[3] = (sskpd >> 20) & 0x1FF;
-		wm[4] = (sskpd >> 32) & 0x1FF;
+			wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[4] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
 		u32 sskpd = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
 
-		wm[0] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
-		wm[1] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
-		wm[2] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
-		wm[3] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
+		wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
+		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
+		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
+		wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5) {
 		u32 mltr = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MLTR_ILK);
 
 		/* ILK primary LP0 latency is 700 ns */
 		wm[0] = 7;
-		wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
-		wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
+		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM1_MASK, mltr);
+		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM2_MASK, mltr);
 	} else {
 		MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv));
 	}
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-30 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-30 16:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: ilk+ wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: s/USHRT_MAX/U16_MAX/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Shrink ilk-bdw wm storage by using u16 Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Rename ilk watermark structs/enums Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: s/dev_priv->wm.hw/&dev_priv->wm.ilk/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: s/ilk_pipe_wm/ilk_wm_state/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Stash away the original SSKPD latency values Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2020-10-30 20:52   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines kernel test robot
2020-10-30 20:52     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-15 10:54   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-15 10:54     ` kernel test robot
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm regidster bits Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: ilk+ wm cleanups Patchwork
2020-10-30 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-30 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2020-10-30 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201030165045.5000-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.