All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/11] evm: Introduce evm_status_revalidate()
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:29:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210505112935.1410679-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

When EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is set, EVM allows any operation on
metadata. Its main purpose is to allow users to freely set metadata when it
is protected by a portable signature, until an HMAC key is loaded.

However, callers of evm_verifyxattr() are not notified about metadata
changes and continue to rely on the last status returned by the function.
For example IMA, since it caches the appraisal result, will not call again
evm_verifyxattr() until the appraisal flags are cleared, and will grant
access to the file even if there was a metadata operation that made the
portable signature invalid.

This patch introduces evm_status_revalidate(), which callers of
evm_verifyxattr() can use in their xattr hooks to determine whether
re-validation is necessary and to do the proper actions. IMA calls it in
its xattr hooks to reset the appraisal flags, so that the EVM status is
re-evaluated after a metadata operation.

Lastly, this patch also adds a call to evm_reset_status() in
evm_inode_post_setattr() to invalidate the cached EVM status after a
setattr operation.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/evm.h                   |  6 +++++
 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c     | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 15 ++++++++----
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h
index 8302bc29bb35..e5b7bcb152b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/evm.h
+++ b/include/linux/evm.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
 				   const struct xattr *xattr_array,
 				   struct xattr *evm);
+extern bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
 extern int posix_xattr_acl(const char *xattrname);
 #else
@@ -104,5 +105,10 @@ static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_EVM */
 #endif /* LINUX_EVM_H */
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
index 7ac5204c8d1f..998818283fda 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
@@ -425,6 +425,30 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode)
 		iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
+/**
+ * evm_status_revalidate - report whether EVM status re-validation is necessary
+ * @xattr_name: pointer to the affected extended attribute name
+ *
+ * Report whether callers of evm_verifyxattr() should re-validate the
+ * EVM status.
+ *
+ * Return true if re-validation is necessary, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name)
+{
+	if (!evm_key_loaded())
+		return false;
+
+	/* evm_inode_post_setattr() passes NULL */
+	if (!xattr_name)
+		return true;
+
+	if (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name) && !posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * evm_inode_post_setxattr - update 'security.evm' to reflect the changes
  * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry
@@ -441,8 +465,7 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode)
 void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 			     const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
 {
-	if (!evm_key_loaded() || (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name)
-				  && !posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name)))
+	if (!evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name))
 		return;
 
 	evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode);
@@ -462,7 +485,7 @@ void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
  */
 void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name)
 {
-	if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name))
+	if (!evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name))
 		return;
 
 	evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode);
@@ -513,9 +536,11 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
  */
 void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid)
 {
-	if (!evm_key_loaded())
+	if (!evm_status_revalidate(NULL))
 		return;
 
+	evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode);
+
 	if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))
 		evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0);
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 4e5eb0236278..ddac9e727d3a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 		       const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
 {
 	const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xvalue = xattr_value;
+	int digsig = 0;
 	int result;
 
 	result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
@@ -577,9 +578,12 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 	if (result == 1) {
 		if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry),
-			xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG);
-		result = 0;
+		digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG);
+	}
+	if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) {
+		ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), digsig);
+		if (result == 1)
+			result = 0;
 	}
 	return result;
 }
@@ -589,9 +593,10 @@ int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name)
 	int result;
 
 	result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0);
-	if (result == 1) {
+	if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) {
 		ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), 0);
-		result = 0;
+		if (result == 1)
+			result = 0;
 	}
 	return result;
 }
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-05 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-05 11:29 [PATCH v6 00/11] evm: Improve usability of portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when an HMAC key is loaded Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] evm: Load EVM key in ima_load_x509() to avoid appraisal Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if an HMAC key is loaded Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 13:41   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-11 14:12     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 19:53       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:29 ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2021-05-11 13:42   ` [PATCH v6 04/11] evm: Introduce evm_status_revalidate() Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] evm: Introduce evm_hmac_disabled() to safely ignore verification errors Roberto Sassu
2021-05-07 13:31   ` [RESEND][PATCH " Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 13:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] evm: Pass user namespace to set/remove xattr hooks Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for unmodified metadata Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 14:11   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-11 14:21     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 14:40       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-11 14:54         ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 20:00           ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] ima: Introduce template field evmsig and write to field sig as fallback Roberto Sassu
2021-05-11 22:12   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-05-12 10:55     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-05-05 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210505112935.1410679-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.