All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/syscall: simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering.c
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:12:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210518191303.4135296-3-hpa@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518191303.4135296-1-hpa@zytor.com>

From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@zytor.com>

Reduce some boiler plate in printing and indenting messages in
syscall_numbering.c. This makes it easier to produce clean status
output.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 102 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c
index 7dd86bcbee25..03915cd48cfc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c
@@ -34,6 +34,33 @@
 
 static unsigned int nerr = 0;	/* Cumulative error count */
 static int nullfd = -1;		/* File descriptor for /dev/null */
+static int indent = 0;
+
+static inline unsigned int offset(void)
+{
+	return 8+indent*4;
+}
+
+#define msg(lvl, fmt, ...) printf("%-*s" fmt, offset(), "[" #lvl "]", \
+                                 ## __VA_ARGS__)
+
+#define run(fmt, ...)  msg(RUN,  fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__)
+#define info(fmt, ...) msg(INFO, fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__)
+#define ok(fmt, ...)   msg(OK,   fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__)
+
+#define fail(fmt, ...)					\
+	do {						\
+		msg(FAIL, fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__);		\
+		nerr++;					\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define crit(fmt, ...)					\
+	do {						\
+		indent = 0;				\
+		msg(FAIL, fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__);		\
+		msg(SKIP, "Unable to run test\n");	\
+		exit(71); /* EX_OSERR */		\
+	} while (0)
 
 /*
  * Directly invokes the given syscall with nullfd as the first argument
@@ -91,28 +118,37 @@ static unsigned int _check_for(int msb, int start, int end, long long expect,
 {
 	unsigned int err = 0;
 
+	indent++;
+	if (start != end)
+		indent++;
+
 	for (int nr = start; nr <= end; nr++) {
 		long long ret = probe_syscall(msb, nr);
 
 		if (ret != expect) {
-			printf("[FAIL]\t      %s returned %lld, but it should have returned %s\n",
+			fail("%s returned %lld, but it should have returned %s\n",
 			       syscall_str(msb, nr, nr),
 			       ret, expect_str);
 			err++;
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (start != end)
+		indent--;
+
 	if (err) {
 		nerr += err;
 		if (start != end)
-			printf("[FAIL]\t      %s had %u failure%s\n",
+			fail("%s had %u failure%s\n",
 			       syscall_str(msb, start, end),
-			       err, (err == 1) ? "s" : "");
+			       err, err == 1 ? "s" : "");
 	} else {
-		printf("[OK]\t      %s returned %s as expected\n",
-		       syscall_str(msb, start, end), expect_str);
+		ok("%s returned %s as expected\n",
+		   syscall_str(msb, start, end), expect_str);
 	}
 
+	indent--;
+
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -137,35 +173,38 @@ static bool check_enosys(int msb, int nr)
 static bool test_x32(void)
 {
 	long long ret;
-	long long mypid = getpid();
+	pid_t mypid = getpid();
+	bool with_x32;
 
-	printf("[RUN]\tChecking for x32 by calling x32 getpid()\n");
+	run("Checking for x32 by calling x32 getpid()\n");
 	ret = probe_syscall(0, SYS_GETPID | X32_BIT);
 
+	indent++;
 	if (ret == mypid) {
-		printf("[INFO]\t   x32 is supported\n");
-		return true;
+		info("x32 is supported\n");
+		with_x32 = true;
 	} else if (ret == -ENOSYS) {
-		printf("[INFO]\t   x32 is not supported\n");
-		return false;
+		info("x32 is not supported\n");
+		with_x32 = false;
 	} else {
-		printf("[FAIL]\t   x32 getpid() returned %lld, but it should have returned either %lld or -ENOSYS\n", ret, mypid);
-		nerr++;
-		return true;	/* Proceed as if... */
+		fail("x32 getpid() returned %lld, but it should have returned either %lld or -ENOSYS\n", ret, mypid);
+		with_x32 = false;
 	}
+	indent--;
+	return with_x32;
 }
 
 static void test_syscalls_common(int msb)
 {
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking some common syscalls as 64 bit\n");
+	run("Checking some common syscalls as 64 bit\n");
 	check_zero(msb, SYS_READ);
 	check_zero(msb, SYS_WRITE);
 
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking some 64-bit only syscalls as 64 bit\n");
+	run("Checking some 64-bit only syscalls as 64 bit\n");
 	check_zero(msb, X64_READV);
 	check_zero(msb, X64_WRITEV);
 
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking out of range system calls\n");
+	run("Checking out of range system calls\n");
 	check_for(msb, -64, -1, -ENOSYS);
 	check_for(msb, X32_BIT-64, X32_BIT-1, -ENOSYS);
 	check_for(msb, -64-X32_BIT, -1-X32_BIT, -ENOSYS);
@@ -180,18 +219,18 @@ static void test_syscalls_with_x32(int msb)
 	 * set.  Calling them without the x32 bit set is
 	 * nonsense and should not work.
 	 */
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking x32 syscalls as 64 bit\n");
+	run("Checking x32 syscalls as 64 bit\n");
 	check_for(msb, 512, 547, -ENOSYS);
 
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking some common syscalls as x32\n");
+	run("Checking some common syscalls as x32\n");
 	check_zero(msb, SYS_READ   | X32_BIT);
 	check_zero(msb, SYS_WRITE  | X32_BIT);
 
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking some x32 syscalls as x32\n");
+	run("Checking some x32 syscalls as x32\n");
 	check_zero(msb, X32_READV  | X32_BIT);
 	check_zero(msb, X32_WRITEV | X32_BIT);
 
-	printf("[RUN]\t   Checking some 64-bit syscalls as x32\n");
+	run("Checking some 64-bit syscalls as x32\n");
 	check_enosys(msb, X64_IOCTL  | X32_BIT);
 	check_enosys(msb, X64_READV  | X32_BIT);
 	check_enosys(msb, X64_WRITEV | X32_BIT);
@@ -199,7 +238,7 @@ static void test_syscalls_with_x32(int msb)
 
 static void test_syscalls_without_x32(int msb)
 {
-	printf("[RUN]\t  Checking for absence of x32 system calls\n");
+	run("Checking for absence of x32 system calls\n");
 	check_for(msb, 0 | X32_BIT, 999 | X32_BIT, -ENOSYS);
 }
 
@@ -217,14 +256,18 @@ static void test_syscall_numbering(void)
 	 */
 	for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(msbs)/sizeof(msbs[0]); i++) {
 		int msb = msbs[i];
-		printf("[RUN]\tChecking system calls with msb = %d (0x%x)\n",
-		       msb, msb);
+		run("Checking system calls with msb = %d (0x%x)\n",
+		    msb, msb);
+
+		indent++;
 
 		test_syscalls_common(msb);
 		if (with_x32)
 			test_syscalls_with_x32(msb);
 		else
 			test_syscalls_without_x32(msb);
+
+		indent--;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -241,19 +284,16 @@ int main(void)
 	 */
 	nullfd = open("/dev/null", O_RDWR);
 	if (nullfd < 0) {
-		printf("[FAIL]\tUnable to open /dev/null: %s\n",
-		       strerror(errno));
-		printf("[SKIP]\tCannot execute test\n");
-		return 71;	/* EX_OSERR */
+		crit("Unable to open /dev/null: %s\n", strerror(errno));
 	}
 
 	test_syscall_numbering();
 	if (!nerr) {
-		printf("[OK]\tAll system calls succeeded or failed as expected\n");
+		ok("All system calls succeeded or failed as expected\n");
 		return 0;
 	} else {
-		printf("[FAIL]\tA total of %u system call%s had incorrect behavior\n",
-		       nerr, nerr != 1 ? "s" : "");
+		fail("A total of %u system call%s had incorrect behavior\n",
+		     nerr, nerr != 1 ? "s" : "");
 		return 1;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18 19:12 [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-18 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/syscall: update and extend selftest syscall_numbering_64 H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Update and extend syscall_numbering_64 tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:12 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86/syscall: add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering.c H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering_64 tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/syscall: sign-extend system calls on entry to int H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry/64: Sign-extend " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/syscall: treat out of range and gap system calls the same H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Treat " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/syscall: use int everywhere for system call numbers H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20  8:53   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-21 21:36     ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-22 13:19       ` David Laight
2021-05-25  8:13   ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-19 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls Ingo Molnar
2021-05-19 16:17   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210518191303.4135296-3-hpa@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.