From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:21:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
Use __release_guc_id (lock held) rather than release_guc_id (acquires
lock), add lockdep annotations.
213.280129] i915: Running i915_perf_live_selftests/live_noa_gpr
[ 213.283459] ============================================
[ 213.283462] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
{{[ 213.283466] 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 Tainted: G U W }}
[ 213.283470] --------------------------------------------
[ 213.283472] kworker/u24:0/8 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.283475] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283618] }}
{{ but task is already holding lock:}}
[ 213.283621] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283720] }}
{{ other info that might help us debug this:}}
[ 213.283724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 213.283727] CPU0
[ 213.283728] ----
[ 213.283730] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
[ 213.283734] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
{{[ 213.283737] }}
{{ *** DEADLOCK ***}}[ 213.283740] May be due to missing lock nesting notation[ 213.283744] 3 locks held by kworker/u24:0/8:
[ 213.283747] #0: ffff8ffb80059d38 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283757] #1: ffffb509000e3e78 ((work_completion)(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker)){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283766] #2: ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283860] }}
{{ stack backtrace:}}
[ 213.283863] CPU: 8 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G U W 5.15.0-rc6+ #18
[ 213.283868] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[ 213.283873] Workqueue: events_unbound destroyed_worker_func [i915]
[ 213.283957] Call Trace:
[ 213.283960] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 213.283966] __lock_acquire.cold+0x191/0x2d3
[ 213.283972] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
[ 213.283978] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284059] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2d7/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284139] ? lock_release+0xb9/0x280
[ 213.284143] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x60
[ 213.284148] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284226] destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284310] process_one_work+0x270/0x550
[ 213.284315] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
[ 213.284319] ? process_one_work+0x550/0x550
[ 213.284322] kthread+0x135/0x160
[ 213.284326] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 213.284331] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
and a bit later in the trace:
{{ 227.499864] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0xa0}}
[ 227.499868] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60
[ 227.499871] ? guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.499995] guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500104] intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x99/0x4b0 [i915]
[ 227.500209] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
[ 227.500212] intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x46/0x50 [i915]
[ 227.500320] reset_prepare+0x78/0x90 [i915]
[ 227.500412] __intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x13/0xe0 [i915]
[ 227.500485] intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x54/0x100 [i915]
[ 227.500556] intel_gt_set_wedged_on_fini+0x1a/0x30 [i915]
[ 227.500622] intel_gt_driver_unregister+0x1e/0x60 [i915]
[ 227.500694] i915_driver_remove+0x4a/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500767] i915_pci_probe+0x84/0x170 [i915]
[ 227.500838] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
[ 227.500842] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x190
[ 227.500844] really_probe+0x1f2/0x3f0
[ 227.500847] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
[ 227.500848] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[ 227.500850] __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1d0
[ 227.500851] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500853] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500854] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90
[ 227.500856] bus_add_driver+0x12e/0x1f0
[ 227.500857] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[ 227.500859] i915_init+0x1d/0x8f [i915]
[ 227.500934] ? 0xffffffffc144a000
[ 227.500936] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0
[ 227.500938] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 227.500940] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x238/0x2d0
[ 227.500944] do_init_module+0x5c/0x270
[ 227.500946] __do_sys_finit_module+0x95/0xe0
[ 227.500949] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 227.500951] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 227.500953] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500954] Code: c8 0c 00 0f 05 eb a9 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3b 80 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 227.500955] RSP: 002b:00007fff320bbf48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
[ 227.500956] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000022ea710 RCX: 00007ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000022e1d90 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 227.500958] RBP: 0000000000000020 R08: 00007ffa59df3a60 R09: 0000000000000070
[ 227.500958] R10: 00000000022e1d90 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000022e1d90
[ 227.500959] R13: 00000000022e58e0 R14: 0000000000000043 R15: 00000000022e42c0
v2:
(CI build)
- Fix build error
Fixes: 1a52faed31311 ("drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index d7710debcd47..38b47e73e35d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
unsigned long flags;
bool disabled;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&guc->submission_state.lock);
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt));
GEM_BUG_ON(!lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id.id));
GEM_BUG_ON(ce != __get_context(guc, ce->guc_id.id));
@@ -2388,7 +2389,7 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
if (unlikely(disabled)) {
- release_guc_id(guc, ce);
+ __release_guc_id(guc, ce);
__guc_context_destroy(ce);
return;
}
--
2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:21:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
Use __release_guc_id (lock held) rather than release_guc_id (acquires
lock), add lockdep annotations.
213.280129] i915: Running i915_perf_live_selftests/live_noa_gpr
[ 213.283459] ============================================
[ 213.283462] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
{{[ 213.283466] 5.15.0-rc6+ #18 Tainted: G U W }}
[ 213.283470] --------------------------------------------
[ 213.283472] kworker/u24:0/8 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.283475] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283618] }}
{{ but task is already holding lock:}}
[ 213.283621] ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283720] }}
{{ other info that might help us debug this:}}
[ 213.283724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 213.283727] CPU0
[ 213.283728] ----
[ 213.283730] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
[ 213.283734] lock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
{{[ 213.283737] }}
{{ *** DEADLOCK ***}}[ 213.283740] May be due to missing lock nesting notation[ 213.283744] 3 locks held by kworker/u24:0/8:
[ 213.283747] #0: ffff8ffb80059d38 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283757] #1: ffffb509000e3e78 ((work_completion)(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker)){..}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f3/0x550
[ 213.283766] #2: ffff8ffc4f6cc1e8 (&guc->submission_state.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: destroyed_worker_func+0x4f/0x350 [i915]
{{[ 213.283860] }}
{{ stack backtrace:}}
[ 213.283863] CPU: 8 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G U W 5.15.0-rc6+ #18
[ 213.283868] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[ 213.283873] Workqueue: events_unbound destroyed_worker_func [i915]
[ 213.283957] Call Trace:
[ 213.283960] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 213.283966] __lock_acquire.cold+0x191/0x2d3
[ 213.283972] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
[ 213.283978] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284059] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2d7/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284139] ? lock_release+0xb9/0x280
[ 213.284143] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x60
[ 213.284148] ? destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284226] destroyed_worker_func+0x2df/0x350 [i915]
[ 213.284310] process_one_work+0x270/0x550
[ 213.284315] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
[ 213.284319] ? process_one_work+0x550/0x550
[ 213.284322] kthread+0x135/0x160
[ 213.284326] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 213.284331] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
and a bit later in the trace:
{{ 227.499864] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0xa0}}
[ 227.499868] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60
[ 227.499871] ? guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.499995] guc_flush_destroyed_contexts+0x4f/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500104] intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x99/0x4b0 [i915]
[ 227.500209] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
[ 227.500212] intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x46/0x50 [i915]
[ 227.500320] reset_prepare+0x78/0x90 [i915]
[ 227.500412] __intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x13/0xe0 [i915]
[ 227.500485] intel_gt_set_wedged.part.0+0x54/0x100 [i915]
[ 227.500556] intel_gt_set_wedged_on_fini+0x1a/0x30 [i915]
[ 227.500622] intel_gt_driver_unregister+0x1e/0x60 [i915]
[ 227.500694] i915_driver_remove+0x4a/0xf0 [i915]
[ 227.500767] i915_pci_probe+0x84/0x170 [i915]
[ 227.500838] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
[ 227.500842] pci_device_probe+0xd9/0x190
[ 227.500844] really_probe+0x1f2/0x3f0
[ 227.500847] __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
[ 227.500848] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[ 227.500850] __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1d0
[ 227.500851] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500853] ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[ 227.500854] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90
[ 227.500856] bus_add_driver+0x12e/0x1f0
[ 227.500857] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[ 227.500859] i915_init+0x1d/0x8f [i915]
[ 227.500934] ? 0xffffffffc144a000
[ 227.500936] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0
[ 227.500938] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 227.500940] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x238/0x2d0
[ 227.500944] do_init_module+0x5c/0x270
[ 227.500946] __do_sys_finit_module+0x95/0xe0
[ 227.500949] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 227.500951] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 227.500953] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500954] Code: c8 0c 00 0f 05 eb a9 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3b 80 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 227.500955] RSP: 002b:00007fff320bbf48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
[ 227.500956] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000022ea710 RCX: 00007ffa59d2ae0d
[ 227.500957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000022e1d90 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 227.500958] RBP: 0000000000000020 R08: 00007ffa59df3a60 R09: 0000000000000070
[ 227.500958] R10: 00000000022e1d90 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000022e1d90
[ 227.500959] R13: 00000000022e58e0 R14: 0000000000000043 R15: 00000000022e42c0
v2:
(CI build)
- Fix build error
Fixes: 1a52faed31311 ("drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index d7710debcd47..38b47e73e35d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
unsigned long flags;
bool disabled;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&guc->submission_state.lock);
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt));
GEM_BUG_ON(!lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id.id));
GEM_BUG_ON(ce != __get_context(guc, ce->guc_id.id));
@@ -2388,7 +2389,7 @@ static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
if (unlikely(disabled)) {
- release_guc_id(guc, ce);
+ __release_guc_id(guc, ce);
__guc_context_destroy(ce);
return;
}
--
2.32.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-20 19:21 Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-10-20 19:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-20 20:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-20 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-10-21 5:39 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Fix recursive lock in GuC submission Thomas Hellström
2021-10-21 5:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2021-10-25 12:23 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 12:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 17:13 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-25 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 9:15 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-26 9:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-20 19:07 Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211020192147.8048-1-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.