All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@huawei.com>
To: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <ming.lei@redhat.com>, <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <hare@suse.de>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next V5] blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:55:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113025536.1479653-1-qiulaibin@huawei.com> (raw)

In case of shared tags, there might be more than one hctx which
allocates from the same tags, and each hctx is limited to allocate at
most:
        hctx_max_depth = max((bt->sb.depth + users - 1) / users, 4U);

tag idle detection is lazy, and may be delayed for 30sec, so there
could be just one real active hctx(queue) but all others are actually
idle and still accounted as active because of the lazy idle detection.
Then if wake_batch is > hctx_max_depth, driver tag allocation may wait
forever on this real active hctx.

Fix this by recalculating wake_batch when inc or dec active_queues.

Fixes: 0d2602ca30e41 ("blk-mq: improve support for shared tags maps")
Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@huawei.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c      | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/sbitmap.h | 11 +++++++++++
 lib/sbitmap.c           | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index e55a6834c9a6..845f74e8dd7b 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -16,6 +16,21 @@
 #include "blk-mq-sched.h"
 #include "blk-mq-tag.h"
 
+/*
+ * Recalculate wakeup batch when tag is shared by hctx.
+ */
+static void blk_mq_update_wake_batch(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+		unsigned int users)
+{
+	if (!users)
+		return;
+
+	sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(&tags->bitmap_tags,
+			users);
+	sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(&tags->breserved_tags,
+			users);
+}
+
 /*
  * If a previously inactive queue goes active, bump the active user count.
  * We need to do this before try to allocate driver tag, then even if fail
@@ -24,18 +39,26 @@
  */
 bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
+	unsigned int users;
+
 	if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(hctx->flags)) {
 		struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
 
-		if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags) &&
-		    !test_and_set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags))
-			atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
+		if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags) ||
+		    test_and_set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags)) {
+			return true;
+		}
 	} else {
-		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
-		    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
-			atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
+		if (test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) ||
+		    test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state)) {
+			return true;
+		}
 	}
 
+	users = atomic_inc_return(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
+
+	blk_mq_update_wake_batch(hctx->tags, users);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -56,6 +79,7 @@ void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool include_reserve)
 void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
+	unsigned int users;
 
 	if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(hctx->flags)) {
 		struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
@@ -68,7 +92,9 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 			return;
 	}
 
-	atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues);
+	users = atomic_dec_return(&tags->active_queues);
+
+	blk_mq_update_wake_batch(tags, users);
 
 	blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/sbitmap.h b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
index fc0357a6e19b..95df357ec009 100644
--- a/include/linux/sbitmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
@@ -415,6 +415,17 @@ static inline void sbitmap_queue_free(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq)
 	sbitmap_free(&sbq->sb);
 }
 
+/**
+ * sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch() - Recalculate wake batch
+ * @sbq: Bitmap queue to recalculate wake batch.
+ * @users: Number of shares.
+ *
+ * Like sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(), this will calculate wake batch
+ * by depth. This interface is for HCTX shared tags or queue shared tags.
+ */
+void sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int users);
+
 /**
  * sbitmap_queue_resize() - Resize a &struct sbitmap_queue.
  * @sbq: Bitmap queue to resize.
diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
index 2709ab825499..6220fa67fb7e 100644
--- a/lib/sbitmap.c
+++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
@@ -457,10 +457,9 @@ int sbitmap_queue_init_node(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, unsigned int depth,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_init_node);
 
-static void sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
-					    unsigned int depth)
+static inline void __sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int wake_batch)
 {
-	unsigned int wake_batch = sbq_calc_wake_batch(sbq, depth);
 	int i;
 
 	if (sbq->wake_batch != wake_batch) {
@@ -476,6 +475,26 @@ static void sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
 	}
 }
 
+static void sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int depth)
+{
+	unsigned int wake_batch;
+
+	wake_batch = sbq_calc_wake_batch(sbq, depth);
+	__sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(sbq, wake_batch);
+}
+
+void sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int users)
+{
+	unsigned int wake_batch;
+
+	wake_batch = clamp_val((sbq->sb.depth + users - 1) /
+			users, 4, SBQ_WAKE_BATCH);
+	__sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(sbq, wake_batch);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch);
+
 void sbitmap_queue_resize(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, unsigned int depth)
 {
 	sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(sbq, depth);
-- 
2.22.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13  2:55 Laibin Qiu [this message]
2022-01-13 10:51 ` [PATCH -next V5] blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-13 19:52 ` Jens Axboe
2022-01-27  1:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-27 17:28   ` Jens Axboe
2022-01-27 18:04     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-27 18:06       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220113025536.1479653-1-qiulaibin@huawei.com \
    --to=qiulaibin@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.