From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>, "Aneesh Kumar" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, "Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Jesse Barnes" <jsbarnes@google.com>, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>, "Michael Larabel" <Michael@michaellarabel.com>, "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>, "Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Ying Huang" <ying.huang@intel.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org, "Yu Zhao" <yuzhao@google.com>, "Brian Geffon" <bgeffon@google.com>, "Jan Alexander Steffens" <heftig@archlinux.org>, "Oleksandr Natalenko" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>, "Steven Barrett" <steven@liquorix.net>, "Suleiman Souhlal" <suleiman@google.com>, "Daniel Byrne" <djbyrne@mtu.edu>, "Donald Carr" <d@chaos-reins.com>, "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>, "Konstantin Kharlamov" <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>, "Shuang Zhai" <szhai2@cs.rochester.edu>, "Sofia Trinh" <sofia.trinh@edi.works>, "Vaibhav Jain" <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH v8 11/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: thrashing prevention Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:47:21 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220308234723.3834941-12-yuzhao@google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220308234723.3834941-1-yuzhao@google.com> Add /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms for thrashing prevention, as requested by many desktop users [1]. When set to value N, it prevents the working set of N milliseconds from getting evicted. The OOM killer is triggered if this working set cannot be kept in memory. Based on the average human detectable lag (~100ms), N=1000 usually eliminates intolerable lags due to thrashing. Larger values like N=3000 make lags less noticeable at the risk of premature OOM kills. Compared with the size-based approach, e.g., [2], this time-based approach has the following advantages: 1. It is easier to configure because it is agnostic to applications and memory sizes. 2. It is more reliable because it is directly wired to the OOM killer. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ydza%2FzXKY9ATRoh6@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211130201652.2218636d@mail.inbox.lv/ Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Acked-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Acked-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org> Acked-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> Acked-by: Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net> Acked-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Tested-by: Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@mtu.edu> Tested-by: Donald Carr <d@chaos-reins.com> Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> Tested-by: Shuang Zhai <szhai2@cs.rochester.edu> Tested-by: Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@edi.works> Tested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> --- include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 ++ mm/vmscan.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h index 51e90e1eec3f..8d245c53ff29 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h @@ -391,6 +391,8 @@ struct lru_gen_struct { unsigned long max_seq; /* the eviction increments the oldest generation numbers */ unsigned long min_seq[ANON_AND_FILE]; + /* the birth time of each generation in jiffies */ + unsigned long timestamps[MAX_NR_GENS]; /* the multi-gen LRU lists */ struct list_head lists[MAX_NR_GENS][ANON_AND_FILE][MAX_NR_ZONES]; /* the sizes of the above lists */ diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 55cc7d6b018b..6aa083b8bb26 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4229,6 +4229,7 @@ static void inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec) for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) reset_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, false); + WRITE_ONCE(lrugen->timestamps[next], jiffies); /* make sure preceding modifications appear */ smp_store_release(&lrugen->max_seq, lrugen->max_seq + 1); @@ -4340,7 +4341,8 @@ static long get_nr_evictable(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq, return total > 0 ? total : 0; } -static void age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) +static bool age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, + unsigned long min_ttl) { bool need_aging; long nr_to_scan; @@ -4349,14 +4351,22 @@ static void age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec); DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec); + if (min_ttl) { + int gen = lru_gen_from_seq(min_seq[LRU_GEN_FILE]); + unsigned long birth = READ_ONCE(lruvec->lrugen.timestamps[gen]); + + if (time_is_after_jiffies(birth + min_ttl)) + return false; + } + mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(NULL, memcg); if (mem_cgroup_below_min(memcg)) - return; + return false; nr_to_scan = get_nr_evictable(lruvec, max_seq, min_seq, swappiness, &need_aging); if (!nr_to_scan) - return; + return false; nr_to_scan >>= sc->priority; @@ -4365,11 +4375,18 @@ static void age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) if (nr_to_scan && need_aging && (!mem_cgroup_below_low(memcg) || sc->memcg_low_reclaim)) try_to_inc_max_seq(lruvec, max_seq, sc, swappiness, false); + + return true; } +/* to protect the working set of the last N jiffies */ +static unsigned long lru_gen_min_ttl __read_mostly; + static void lru_gen_age_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) { struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + bool success = false; + unsigned long min_ttl = READ_ONCE(lru_gen_min_ttl); VM_BUG_ON(!current_is_kswapd()); @@ -4395,12 +4412,29 @@ static void lru_gen_age_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) do { struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat); - age_lruvec(lruvec, sc); + if (age_lruvec(lruvec, sc, min_ttl)) + success = true; cond_resched(); } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL))); current->reclaim_state->mm_walk = NULL; + + /* + * The main goal is to OOM kill if every generation from all memcgs is + * younger than min_ttl. However, another theoretical possibility is all + * memcgs are either below min or empty. + */ + if (!success && mutex_trylock(&oom_lock)) { + struct oom_control oc = { + .gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask, + .order = sc->order, + }; + + out_of_memory(&oc); + + mutex_unlock(&oom_lock); + } } /* @@ -5112,6 +5146,28 @@ static void lru_gen_change_state(bool enable) * sysfs interface ******************************************************************************/ +static ssize_t show_min_ttl(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", jiffies_to_msecs(READ_ONCE(lru_gen_min_ttl))); +} + +static ssize_t store_min_ttl(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t len) +{ + unsigned int msecs; + + if (kstrtouint(buf, 0, &msecs)) + return -EINVAL; + + WRITE_ONCE(lru_gen_min_ttl, msecs_to_jiffies(msecs)); + + return len; +} + +static struct kobj_attribute lru_gen_min_ttl_attr = __ATTR( + min_ttl_ms, 0644, show_min_ttl, store_min_ttl +); + static ssize_t show_enable(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) { unsigned int caps = 0; @@ -5160,6 +5216,7 @@ static struct kobj_attribute lru_gen_enabled_attr = __ATTR( ); static struct attribute *lru_gen_attrs[] = { + &lru_gen_min_ttl_attr.attr, &lru_gen_enabled_attr.attr, NULL }; @@ -5175,12 +5232,16 @@ static struct attribute_group lru_gen_attr_group = { void lru_gen_init_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec) { + int i; int gen, type, zone; struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen; lrugen->max_seq = MIN_NR_GENS + 1; lrugen->enabled = lru_gen_enabled(); + for (i = 0; i <= MIN_NR_GENS + 1; i++) + lrugen->timestamps[i] = jiffies; + for_each_gen_type_zone(gen, type, zone) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lrugen->lists[gen][type][zone]); -- 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>, "Aneesh Kumar" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, "Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Jesse Barnes" <jsbarnes@google.com>, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>, "Michael Larabel" <Michael@michaellarabel.com>, "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>, "Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Ying Huang" <ying.huang@intel.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org, "Yu Zhao" <yuzhao@google.com>, "Brian Geffon" <bgeffon@google.com>, "Jan Alexander Steffens" <heftig@archlinux.org>, "Oleksandr Natalenko" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>, "Steven Barrett" <steven@liquorix.net>, "Suleiman Souhlal" <suleiman@google.com>, "Daniel Byrne" <djbyrne@mtu.edu>, "Donald Carr" <d@chaos-reins.com>, "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>, "Konstantin Kharlamov" <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>, "Shuang Zhai" <szhai2@cs.rochester.edu>, "Sofia Trinh" <sofia.trinh@edi.works>, "Vaibhav Jain" <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH v8 11/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: thrashing prevention Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:47:21 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220308234723.3834941-12-yuzhao@google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220308234723.3834941-1-yuzhao@google.com> Add /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms for thrashing prevention, as requested by many desktop users [1]. When set to value N, it prevents the working set of N milliseconds from getting evicted. The OOM killer is triggered if this working set cannot be kept in memory. Based on the average human detectable lag (~100ms), N=1000 usually eliminates intolerable lags due to thrashing. Larger values like N=3000 make lags less noticeable at the risk of premature OOM kills. Compared with the size-based approach, e.g., [2], this time-based approach has the following advantages: 1. It is easier to configure because it is agnostic to applications and memory sizes. 2. It is more reliable because it is directly wired to the OOM killer. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ydza%2FzXKY9ATRoh6@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211130201652.2218636d@mail.inbox.lv/ Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Acked-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Acked-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org> Acked-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> Acked-by: Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net> Acked-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Tested-by: Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@mtu.edu> Tested-by: Donald Carr <d@chaos-reins.com> Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> Tested-by: Shuang Zhai <szhai2@cs.rochester.edu> Tested-by: Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@edi.works> Tested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> --- include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 ++ mm/vmscan.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h index 51e90e1eec3f..8d245c53ff29 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h @@ -391,6 +391,8 @@ struct lru_gen_struct { unsigned long max_seq; /* the eviction increments the oldest generation numbers */ unsigned long min_seq[ANON_AND_FILE]; + /* the birth time of each generation in jiffies */ + unsigned long timestamps[MAX_NR_GENS]; /* the multi-gen LRU lists */ struct list_head lists[MAX_NR_GENS][ANON_AND_FILE][MAX_NR_ZONES]; /* the sizes of the above lists */ diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 55cc7d6b018b..6aa083b8bb26 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4229,6 +4229,7 @@ static void inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec) for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) reset_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, false); + WRITE_ONCE(lrugen->timestamps[next], jiffies); /* make sure preceding modifications appear */ smp_store_release(&lrugen->max_seq, lrugen->max_seq + 1); @@ -4340,7 +4341,8 @@ static long get_nr_evictable(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq, return total > 0 ? total : 0; } -static void age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) +static bool age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, + unsigned long min_ttl) { bool need_aging; long nr_to_scan; @@ -4349,14 +4351,22 @@ static void age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec); DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec); + if (min_ttl) { + int gen = lru_gen_from_seq(min_seq[LRU_GEN_FILE]); + unsigned long birth = READ_ONCE(lruvec->lrugen.timestamps[gen]); + + if (time_is_after_jiffies(birth + min_ttl)) + return false; + } + mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(NULL, memcg); if (mem_cgroup_below_min(memcg)) - return; + return false; nr_to_scan = get_nr_evictable(lruvec, max_seq, min_seq, swappiness, &need_aging); if (!nr_to_scan) - return; + return false; nr_to_scan >>= sc->priority; @@ -4365,11 +4375,18 @@ static void age_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) if (nr_to_scan && need_aging && (!mem_cgroup_below_low(memcg) || sc->memcg_low_reclaim)) try_to_inc_max_seq(lruvec, max_seq, sc, swappiness, false); + + return true; } +/* to protect the working set of the last N jiffies */ +static unsigned long lru_gen_min_ttl __read_mostly; + static void lru_gen_age_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) { struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + bool success = false; + unsigned long min_ttl = READ_ONCE(lru_gen_min_ttl); VM_BUG_ON(!current_is_kswapd()); @@ -4395,12 +4412,29 @@ static void lru_gen_age_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) do { struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat); - age_lruvec(lruvec, sc); + if (age_lruvec(lruvec, sc, min_ttl)) + success = true; cond_resched(); } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL))); current->reclaim_state->mm_walk = NULL; + + /* + * The main goal is to OOM kill if every generation from all memcgs is + * younger than min_ttl. However, another theoretical possibility is all + * memcgs are either below min or empty. + */ + if (!success && mutex_trylock(&oom_lock)) { + struct oom_control oc = { + .gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask, + .order = sc->order, + }; + + out_of_memory(&oc); + + mutex_unlock(&oom_lock); + } } /* @@ -5112,6 +5146,28 @@ static void lru_gen_change_state(bool enable) * sysfs interface ******************************************************************************/ +static ssize_t show_min_ttl(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", jiffies_to_msecs(READ_ONCE(lru_gen_min_ttl))); +} + +static ssize_t store_min_ttl(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t len) +{ + unsigned int msecs; + + if (kstrtouint(buf, 0, &msecs)) + return -EINVAL; + + WRITE_ONCE(lru_gen_min_ttl, msecs_to_jiffies(msecs)); + + return len; +} + +static struct kobj_attribute lru_gen_min_ttl_attr = __ATTR( + min_ttl_ms, 0644, show_min_ttl, store_min_ttl +); + static ssize_t show_enable(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) { unsigned int caps = 0; @@ -5160,6 +5216,7 @@ static struct kobj_attribute lru_gen_enabled_attr = __ATTR( ); static struct attribute *lru_gen_attrs[] = { + &lru_gen_min_ttl_attr.attr, &lru_gen_enabled_attr.attr, NULL }; @@ -5175,12 +5232,16 @@ static struct attribute_group lru_gen_attr_group = { void lru_gen_init_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec) { + int i; int gen, type, zone; struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen; lrugen->max_seq = MIN_NR_GENS + 1; lrugen->enabled = lru_gen_enabled(); + for (i = 0; i <= MIN_NR_GENS + 1; i++) + lrugen->timestamps[i] = jiffies; + for_each_gen_type_zone(gen, type, zone) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lrugen->lists[gen][type][zone]); -- 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 1:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-03-08 23:47 [PATCH v8 00/14] Multi-Gen LRU Framework Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] mm: x86, arm64: add arch_has_hw_pte_young() Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] mm: x86: add CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NONLEAF_PMD_YOUNG Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] mm/vmscan.c: refactor shrink_node() Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] Revert "include/linux/mm_inline.h: fold __update_lru_size() into its sole caller" Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: groundwork Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-03-08 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: minimal implementation Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-09 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-03-09 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: exploit locality in rmap Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: support page table walks Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: optimize multiple memcgs Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: kill switch Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao [this message] 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: thrashing prevention Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: debugfs interface Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: admin guide Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: design doc Yu Zhao 2022-03-08 23:47 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-09 0:06 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] Multi-Gen LRU Framework Linus Torvalds 2022-03-09 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-03-09 0:14 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-09 0:14 ` Yu Zhao 2022-03-09 0:29 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-03-09 0:29 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220308234723.3834941-12-yuzhao@google.com \ --to=yuzhao@google.com \ --cc=Hi-Angel@yandex.ru \ --cc=Michael@michaellarabel.com \ --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=bgeffon@google.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=d@chaos-reins.com \ --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=djbyrne@mtu.edu \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=hdanton@sina.com \ --cc=heftig@archlinux.org \ --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \ --cc=jsbarnes@google.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mgorman@suse.de \ --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \ --cc=page-reclaim@google.com \ --cc=riel@surriel.com \ --cc=rppt@kernel.org \ --cc=sofia.trinh@edi.works \ --cc=steven@liquorix.net \ --cc=suleiman@google.com \ --cc=szhai2@cs.rochester.edu \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=willy@infradead.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.