All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:30:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511113039.1252432-1-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511112438.1251024-1-javierm@redhat.com>

Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().

This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.

To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.

A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
a removal loop restart.

Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fb.h               |  1 -
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index b445a7a00def..2fda5917c212 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 {
 	int i;
 
+restart_removal:
 	/* check all firmware fbs and kick off if the base addr overlaps */
 	for_each_registered_fb(i) {
 		struct apertures_struct *gen_aper;
@@ -1587,12 +1588,23 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 				pr_warn("fb%d: no device set\n", i);
 				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
 			} else if (dev_is_platform(device)) {
-				registered_fb[i]->forced_out = true;
+				/*
+				 * Drop the lock because if the device is unregistered, its
+				 * driver will call to unregister_framebuffer(), that takes
+				 * this lock.
+				 */
+				mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 				platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(device));
+				mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
 			} else {
 				pr_warn("fb%d: cannot remove device\n", i);
 				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
 			}
+			/*
+			 * Restart the removal loop now that the device has been
+			 * unregistered and its associated framebuffer gone.
+			 */
+			goto restart_removal;
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -1899,13 +1911,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_framebuffer);
 void
 unregister_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
 {
-	bool forced_out = fb_info->forced_out;
-
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
 	do_unregister_framebuffer(fb_info);
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_framebuffer);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
index 69c67c70fa78..bbe1e4571899 100644
--- a/include/linux/fb.h
+++ b/include/linux/fb.h
@@ -511,7 +511,6 @@ struct fb_info {
 	} *apertures;
 
 	bool skip_vt_switch; /* no VT switch on suspend/resume required */
-	bool forced_out; /* set when being removed by another driver */
 };
 
 static inline struct apertures_struct *alloc_apertures(unsigned int max_num) {
-- 
2.35.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:30:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511113039.1252432-1-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511112438.1251024-1-javierm@redhat.com>

Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().

This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.

To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.

A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
a removal loop restart.

Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fb.h               |  1 -
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index b445a7a00def..2fda5917c212 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 {
 	int i;
 
+restart_removal:
 	/* check all firmware fbs and kick off if the base addr overlaps */
 	for_each_registered_fb(i) {
 		struct apertures_struct *gen_aper;
@@ -1587,12 +1588,23 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 				pr_warn("fb%d: no device set\n", i);
 				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
 			} else if (dev_is_platform(device)) {
-				registered_fb[i]->forced_out = true;
+				/*
+				 * Drop the lock because if the device is unregistered, its
+				 * driver will call to unregister_framebuffer(), that takes
+				 * this lock.
+				 */
+				mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 				platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(device));
+				mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
 			} else {
 				pr_warn("fb%d: cannot remove device\n", i);
 				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
 			}
+			/*
+			 * Restart the removal loop now that the device has been
+			 * unregistered and its associated framebuffer gone.
+			 */
+			goto restart_removal;
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -1899,13 +1911,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_framebuffer);
 void
 unregister_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
 {
-	bool forced_out = fb_info->forced_out;
-
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
 	do_unregister_framebuffer(fb_info);
-	if (!forced_out)
-		mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_framebuffer);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
index 69c67c70fa78..bbe1e4571899 100644
--- a/include/linux/fb.h
+++ b/include/linux/fb.h
@@ -511,7 +511,6 @@ struct fb_info {
 	} *apertures;
 
 	bool skip_vt_switch; /* no VT switch on suspend/resume required */
-	bool forced_out; /* set when being removed by another driver */
 };
 
 static inline struct apertures_struct *alloc_apertures(unsigned int max_num) {
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 11:24 [PATCH v5 0/7] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] firmware: sysfb: Make sysfb_create_simplefb() return a pdev pointer Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:04   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:04     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] firmware: sysfb: Add helpers to unregister a pdev and disable registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:54     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:01     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:01       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:05       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:05         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:29         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:29           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:02   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:02     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:24     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:24       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:30 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-05-11 11:30   ` [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:47   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:47     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:57     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:57       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 12:28   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 12:28     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] fbdev: Make sysfb to unregister its own registered devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-07 15:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-06-07 15:01     ` Daniel Vetter
2022-06-07 15:41     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] Revert "fbdev: Prevent probing generic drivers if a FB is already registered" Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 17:00   ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-11 17:00     ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-11 17:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-11 17:17       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-11 17:34       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 17:34         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-12 18:32         ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-12 18:32           ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 10:48   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 11:10   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 11:10     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 11:32     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 11:32       ` Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511113039.1252432-1-javierm@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.