All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan with multiple parents
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 15:25:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220516132527.328190-13-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220516132527.328190-1-maxime@cerno.tech>

Let's leverage the dummy mux with multiple parents we have to create a
mux whose default parent will never be registered, and thus will always
be orphan by default.

We can then create some tests to make sure that the clock API behaves
properly in such a case, and that the transition to a non-orphan clock
when we change the parent is done properly.

Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 210 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index 26468fb24819..8de6339f4f8d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -465,6 +465,215 @@ clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases,
 };
 
+static int
+clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
+	const char *parents[2] = { "missing-parent", "proper-parent"};
+	int ret;
+
+	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	test->priv = ctx;
+
+	ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("proper-parent",
+							    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
+							    0);
+	ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE;
+	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-orphan-mux", parents,
+					   &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
+					   CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+
+	clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw);
+	clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet,
+ * calling clk_set_parent() to a valid parent will properly update the
+ * mux parent and its orphan status.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent, *new_parent;
+	int ret;
+
+	parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+	ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	new_parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, new_parent));
+
+	clk_put(parent);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
+ * parent, the rate of the mux and its new parent are consistent.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent;
+	unsigned long parent_rate, rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+	parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, rate);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
+ * parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() will affect the parent state if
+ * its rate is out of range.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+	ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+
+	clk_put(parent);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet,
+ * calling clk_set_rate_range() will succeed, and will be taken into
+ * account when rounding a rate.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan, was assigned and rate and
+ * then got switched to a valid parent, its rate is eventually within
+ * range.
+ *
+ * FIXME: Even though we update the rate as part of clk_set_parent(), we
+ * don't evaluate whether that new rate is within range and needs to be
+ * adjusted.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+	clk_hw_set_rate_range(hw, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+
+	parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+	ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+
+	clk_put(parent);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate),
+	{}
+};
+
+/*
+ * Test suite for a basic mux clock with two parents. The default parent
+ * isn't registered, only the second parent is. By default, the clock
+ * will thus be orphan.
+ *
+ * These tests exercise the behaviour of the consumer API when dealing
+ * with an orphan clock, and how we deal with the transition to a valid
+ * parent.
+ */
+static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite = {
+	.name = "clk-orphan-transparent-multiple-parent-mux-test",
+	.init = clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_init,
+	.exit = clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_exit,
+	.test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases,
+};
+
 struct clk_single_parent_ctx {
 	struct clk_dummy_context parent_ctx;
 	struct clk_hw hw;
@@ -1407,6 +1616,7 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_range_minimize_test_suite = {
 kunit_test_suites(
 	&clk_test_suite,
 	&clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite,
+	&clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite,
 	&clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite,
 	&clk_range_test_suite,
 	&clk_range_maximize_test_suite,
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-16 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16 13:24 [PATCH v5 00/28] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 01/28] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 02/28] clk: Skip clamping when rounding if there's no boundaries Maxime Ripard
2022-06-27 23:21   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-28  8:58     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 03/28] clk: Introduce clk_get_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-06-27 23:23   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 04/28] drm/vc4: hdmi: Rework hdmi_enable_4kp60 detection Maxime Ripard
2022-06-27 23:31   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-28  9:47     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-06-29  8:48       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-29  9:29         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 05/28] clk: Mention that .recalc_rate can return 0 on error Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 06/28] clk: Clarify clk_get_rate() expectations Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 07/28] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 08/28] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 09/28] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/28] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 11/28] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 13/28] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-06-29  9:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-29 12:42     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 14/28] clk: Fix clk_get_parent() documentation Maxime Ripard
2022-06-29  9:05   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-29 13:12     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 15/28] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 16/28] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 17/28] clk: Move clk_core_init_rate_req() from clk_core_round_rate_nolock() to its caller Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 18/28] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 19/28] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 20/28] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 21/28] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent() Maxime Ripard
2022-06-29  9:11   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 22/28] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 23/28] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 24/28] clk: Test the clock pointer in clk_hw_get_name() Maxime Ripard
2022-06-29  9:13   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-29  9:39     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 25/28] clk: Introduce the clk_hw_get_rate_range function Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 26/28] clk: qcom: clk-rcg2: Take clock boundaries into consideration for gfx3d Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 27/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for clk_get_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-05-16 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 28/28] clk: tests: Add missing test case for ranges Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220516132527.328190-13-maxime@cerno.tech \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.