[PATCH v2] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing

[Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>]

This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to
the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could
fire on an uninitialized hart ID.

The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer
initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA
that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will
just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems.  This also
changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before
enabling Zicbom support.

Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
Fixes: 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

---

Changes since v1 <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220812142400.7186-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/>:

* Everything but the unsigned long cbom_hartid.
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c       |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 95ef6e2bf45c..2dfc463b86bb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	setup_smp();
 #endif
 
-	riscv_fill_hwcap();
 	riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
+	riscv_fill_hwcap();
 	apply_boot_alternatives();
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
index cd2225304c82..3aa3572715d6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 
-static unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
+static unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
 static bool noncoherent_supported;
 
 void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
@@ -80,37 +80,39 @@ void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
 {
 	struct device_node *node;
 	int ret;
-	u32 val;
+	u32 val, probed_block_size;
 
+	probed_block_size = 0;
 	for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
-		unsigned long hartid;
-		int cbom_hartid;
+		unsigned long hartid, cbom_hartid;
 
 		ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
 		if (ret)
 			continue;
 
-		if (hartid < 0)
-			continue;
-
 		/* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
 		ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
 		if (ret)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
-			riscv_cbom_block_size = val;
+		if (!probed_block_size) {
+			probed_block_size = val;
 			cbom_hartid = hartid;
 		} else {
-			if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val)
+			if (probed_block_size != val)
 				pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n",
 					cbom_hartid, hartid);
 		}
 	}
+
+	if (probed_block_size)
+		riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
 }
 #endif
 
 void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
 {
+	WARN_ON(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
+	        "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
 	noncoherent_supported = true;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv