All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: use a consistent completion timeout
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:37:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120143734.3438755-6-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120143734.3438755-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Completion timeouts use jiffies, so passing a number directly will
produce inconsistent timeouts depending on config. Define the timeout in
ms and convert it to jiffies instead.

Since a define is being created where one previously did not exist,
pick a suitable timeout duration. Most services will complete nearly
immediately, but those relating to image verification and re-programming
the FPGA take significant amounts of time. 30 seconds is a suitable
timeout for those situations, although most services will complete in
under 100 ms.

Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
index 12039cb38b33..e76a5e38f655 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
@@ -11,12 +11,19 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/kref.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <soc/microchip/mpfs.h>
 
+/*
+ * This timeout must be long, as some services (example: image authentication)
+ * take many seconds to complete
+ */
+#define MPFS_SYS_CTRL_TIMEOUT_MS 30000
+
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(transaction_lock);
 
 struct mpfs_sys_controller {
@@ -28,6 +35,7 @@ struct mpfs_sys_controller {
 
 int mpfs_blocking_transaction(struct mpfs_sys_controller *sys_controller, struct mpfs_mss_msg *msg)
 {
+	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(MPFS_SYS_CTRL_TIMEOUT_MS);
 	int ret, err;
 
 	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&transaction_lock);
@@ -38,7 +46,7 @@ int mpfs_blocking_transaction(struct mpfs_sys_controller *sys_controller, struct
 
 	ret = mbox_send_message(sys_controller->chan, msg);
 	if (ret >= 0) {
-		if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, HZ)) {
+		if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, timeout)) {
 			ret = 0;
 		} else {
 			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.39.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: use a consistent completion timeout
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:37:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120143734.3438755-6-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120143734.3438755-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Completion timeouts use jiffies, so passing a number directly will
produce inconsistent timeouts depending on config. Define the timeout in
ms and convert it to jiffies instead.

Since a define is being created where one previously did not exist,
pick a suitable timeout duration. Most services will complete nearly
immediately, but those relating to image verification and re-programming
the FPGA take significant amounts of time. 30 seconds is a suitable
timeout for those situations, although most services will complete in
under 100 ms.

Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
index 12039cb38b33..e76a5e38f655 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
@@ -11,12 +11,19 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/kref.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <soc/microchip/mpfs.h>
 
+/*
+ * This timeout must be long, as some services (example: image authentication)
+ * take many seconds to complete
+ */
+#define MPFS_SYS_CTRL_TIMEOUT_MS 30000
+
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(transaction_lock);
 
 struct mpfs_sys_controller {
@@ -28,6 +35,7 @@ struct mpfs_sys_controller {
 
 int mpfs_blocking_transaction(struct mpfs_sys_controller *sys_controller, struct mpfs_mss_msg *msg)
 {
+	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(MPFS_SYS_CTRL_TIMEOUT_MS);
 	int ret, err;
 
 	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&transaction_lock);
@@ -38,7 +46,7 @@ int mpfs_blocking_transaction(struct mpfs_sys_controller *sys_controller, struct
 
 	ret = mbox_send_message(sys_controller->chan, msg);
 	if (ret >= 0) {
-		if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, HZ)) {
+		if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, timeout)) {
 			ret = 0;
 		} else {
 			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.39.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-20 14:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] MPFS system controller/mailbox fixes Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mailbox: mpfs: fix an incorrect mask width Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mailbox: mpfs: switch to txdone_poll Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mailbox: mpfs: ditch a useless busy check Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: fix some horrible alignment Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-01-20 14:37   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: use a consistent completion timeout Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: simplify error handling in mpfs_blocking_transaction() Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: handle timeouts and failed services differently Conor Dooley
2023-01-20 14:37   ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230120143734.3438755-6-conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.