All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2023 17:23:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206172340.2639971-2-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206172340.2639971-1-rananta@google.com>

Currently, the core TLB flush functionality of __flush_tlb_range()
hardcodes vae1is (and variants) for the flush operation. In the
upcoming patches, the KVM code reuses this core algorithm with
ipas2e1is for range based TLB invalidations based on the IPA.
Hence, extract the core flush functionality of __flush_tlb_range()
into its own macro that accepts an 'op' argument to pass any
TLBI operation, such that other callers (KVM) can benefit.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 107 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 412a3b9a3c25d..9a57eae14e576 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -278,14 +278,60 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  */
 #define MAX_TLBI_OPS	PTRS_PER_PTE
 
+/* When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
+ * entries one by one at the granularity of 'stride'. If the TLB
+ * range ops are supported, then:
+ *
+ * 1. If 'pages' is odd, flush the first page through non-range
+ *    operations;
+ *
+ * 2. For remaining pages: the minimum range granularity is decided
+ *    by 'scale', so multiple range TLBI operations may be required.
+ *    Start from scale = 0, flush the corresponding number of pages
+ *    ((num+1)*2^(5*scale+1) starting from 'addr'), then increase it
+ *    until no pages left.
+ *
+ * Note that certain ranges can be represented by either num = 31 and
+ * scale or num = 0 and scale + 1. The loop below favours the latter
+ * since num is limited to 30 by the __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro.
+ */
+#define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, tlbi_user) do {	\
+	int num = 0;										\
+	int scale = 0;										\
+	unsigned long addr;									\
+												\
+	while (pages > 0) {									\
+		if (!system_supports_tlb_range() ||						\
+		    pages % 2 == 1) {								\
+			addr = __TLBI_VADDR(start, asid);					\
+			__tlbi_level(op, addr, tlb_level);					\
+			if (tlbi_user)								\
+				__tlbi_user_level(op, addr, tlb_level);				\
+			start += stride;							\
+			pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT;						\
+			continue;								\
+		}										\
+												\
+		num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(pages, scale);						\
+		if (num >= 0) {									\
+			addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(start, asid, scale,				\
+						  num, tlb_level);				\
+			__tlbi(r##op, addr);							\
+			if (tlbi_user)								\
+				__tlbi_user(r##op, addr);					\
+			start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT;			\
+			pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);				\
+		}										\
+		scale++;									\
+	}											\
+} while (0)
+
 static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				     unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 				     unsigned long stride, bool last_level,
 				     int tlb_level)
 {
-	int num = 0;
-	int scale = 0;
-	unsigned long asid, addr, pages;
+	unsigned long asid, pages;
 
 	start = round_down(start, stride);
 	end = round_up(end, stride);
@@ -307,56 +353,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	dsb(ishst);
 	asid = ASID(vma->vm_mm);
 
-	/*
-	 * When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
-	 * entries one by one at the granularity of 'stride'. If the TLB
-	 * range ops are supported, then:
-	 *
-	 * 1. If 'pages' is odd, flush the first page through non-range
-	 *    operations;
-	 *
-	 * 2. For remaining pages: the minimum range granularity is decided
-	 *    by 'scale', so multiple range TLBI operations may be required.
-	 *    Start from scale = 0, flush the corresponding number of pages
-	 *    ((num+1)*2^(5*scale+1) starting from 'addr'), then increase it
-	 *    until no pages left.
-	 *
-	 * Note that certain ranges can be represented by either num = 31 and
-	 * scale or num = 0 and scale + 1. The loop below favours the latter
-	 * since num is limited to 30 by the __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro.
-	 */
-	while (pages > 0) {
-		if (!system_supports_tlb_range() ||
-		    pages % 2 == 1) {
-			addr = __TLBI_VADDR(start, asid);
-			if (last_level) {
-				__tlbi_level(vale1is, addr, tlb_level);
-				__tlbi_user_level(vale1is, addr, tlb_level);
-			} else {
-				__tlbi_level(vae1is, addr, tlb_level);
-				__tlbi_user_level(vae1is, addr, tlb_level);
-			}
-			start += stride;
-			pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(pages, scale);
-		if (num >= 0) {
-			addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(start, asid, scale,
-						  num, tlb_level);
-			if (last_level) {
-				__tlbi(rvale1is, addr);
-				__tlbi_user(rvale1is, addr);
-			} else {
-				__tlbi(rvae1is, addr);
-				__tlbi_user(rvae1is, addr);
-			}
-			start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT;
-			pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);
-		}
-		scale++;
-	}
+	if (last_level)
+		__flush_tlb_range_op(vale1is, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, true);
+	else
+		__flush_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, true);
+
 	dsb(ish);
 }
 
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	 Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	 Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2023 17:23:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206172340.2639971-2-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206172340.2639971-1-rananta@google.com>

Currently, the core TLB flush functionality of __flush_tlb_range()
hardcodes vae1is (and variants) for the flush operation. In the
upcoming patches, the KVM code reuses this core algorithm with
ipas2e1is for range based TLB invalidations based on the IPA.
Hence, extract the core flush functionality of __flush_tlb_range()
into its own macro that accepts an 'op' argument to pass any
TLBI operation, such that other callers (KVM) can benefit.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 107 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 412a3b9a3c25d..9a57eae14e576 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -278,14 +278,60 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  */
 #define MAX_TLBI_OPS	PTRS_PER_PTE
 
+/* When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
+ * entries one by one at the granularity of 'stride'. If the TLB
+ * range ops are supported, then:
+ *
+ * 1. If 'pages' is odd, flush the first page through non-range
+ *    operations;
+ *
+ * 2. For remaining pages: the minimum range granularity is decided
+ *    by 'scale', so multiple range TLBI operations may be required.
+ *    Start from scale = 0, flush the corresponding number of pages
+ *    ((num+1)*2^(5*scale+1) starting from 'addr'), then increase it
+ *    until no pages left.
+ *
+ * Note that certain ranges can be represented by either num = 31 and
+ * scale or num = 0 and scale + 1. The loop below favours the latter
+ * since num is limited to 30 by the __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro.
+ */
+#define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, tlbi_user) do {	\
+	int num = 0;										\
+	int scale = 0;										\
+	unsigned long addr;									\
+												\
+	while (pages > 0) {									\
+		if (!system_supports_tlb_range() ||						\
+		    pages % 2 == 1) {								\
+			addr = __TLBI_VADDR(start, asid);					\
+			__tlbi_level(op, addr, tlb_level);					\
+			if (tlbi_user)								\
+				__tlbi_user_level(op, addr, tlb_level);				\
+			start += stride;							\
+			pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT;						\
+			continue;								\
+		}										\
+												\
+		num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(pages, scale);						\
+		if (num >= 0) {									\
+			addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(start, asid, scale,				\
+						  num, tlb_level);				\
+			__tlbi(r##op, addr);							\
+			if (tlbi_user)								\
+				__tlbi_user(r##op, addr);					\
+			start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT;			\
+			pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);				\
+		}										\
+		scale++;									\
+	}											\
+} while (0)
+
 static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				     unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 				     unsigned long stride, bool last_level,
 				     int tlb_level)
 {
-	int num = 0;
-	int scale = 0;
-	unsigned long asid, addr, pages;
+	unsigned long asid, pages;
 
 	start = round_down(start, stride);
 	end = round_up(end, stride);
@@ -307,56 +353,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	dsb(ishst);
 	asid = ASID(vma->vm_mm);
 
-	/*
-	 * When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
-	 * entries one by one at the granularity of 'stride'. If the TLB
-	 * range ops are supported, then:
-	 *
-	 * 1. If 'pages' is odd, flush the first page through non-range
-	 *    operations;
-	 *
-	 * 2. For remaining pages: the minimum range granularity is decided
-	 *    by 'scale', so multiple range TLBI operations may be required.
-	 *    Start from scale = 0, flush the corresponding number of pages
-	 *    ((num+1)*2^(5*scale+1) starting from 'addr'), then increase it
-	 *    until no pages left.
-	 *
-	 * Note that certain ranges can be represented by either num = 31 and
-	 * scale or num = 0 and scale + 1. The loop below favours the latter
-	 * since num is limited to 30 by the __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro.
-	 */
-	while (pages > 0) {
-		if (!system_supports_tlb_range() ||
-		    pages % 2 == 1) {
-			addr = __TLBI_VADDR(start, asid);
-			if (last_level) {
-				__tlbi_level(vale1is, addr, tlb_level);
-				__tlbi_user_level(vale1is, addr, tlb_level);
-			} else {
-				__tlbi_level(vae1is, addr, tlb_level);
-				__tlbi_user_level(vae1is, addr, tlb_level);
-			}
-			start += stride;
-			pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		num = __TLBI_RANGE_NUM(pages, scale);
-		if (num >= 0) {
-			addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(start, asid, scale,
-						  num, tlb_level);
-			if (last_level) {
-				__tlbi(rvale1is, addr);
-				__tlbi_user(rvale1is, addr);
-			} else {
-				__tlbi(rvae1is, addr);
-				__tlbi_user(rvae1is, addr);
-			}
-			start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT;
-			pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);
-		}
-		scale++;
-	}
+	if (last_level)
+		__flush_tlb_range_op(vale1is, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, true);
+	else
+		__flush_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride, asid, tlb_level, true);
+
 	dsb(ish);
 }
 
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-06 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-06 17:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-02-06 17:23   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: arm64: Add FEAT_TLBIRANGE support Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-30  1:19   ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-30  1:19     ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-03 17:26     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-03 17:26       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 18:41       ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 18:41         ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 18:50         ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 18:50           ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 21:39         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 21:39           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_range_vmid_ipa() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-30  0:59   ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-30  0:59     ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-03 21:08     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-03 21:08       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 18:46       ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 18:46         ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 20:50         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 20:50           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-30  0:53   ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-30  0:53     ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-03 21:23     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-03 21:23       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 19:09       ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 19:09         ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 20:59         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 20:59           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: arm64: Break the table entries using TLBI range instructions Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-30  0:17   ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-30  0:17     ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-03 21:25     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-03 21:25       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: arm64: Create a fast stage-2 unmap path Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-06 17:23   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-30  0:42   ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-30  0:42     ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 17:52     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 17:52       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 19:19       ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 19:19         ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 21:07         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 21:07           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 21:30           ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 21:30             ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 21:45             ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-04-04 21:45               ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230206172340.2639971-2-rananta@google.com \
    --to=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.