All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 19:00:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a170314-6082-f3ba-cfb4-c19d7eb576c0@i2se.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6M5SPBpp/xMzUz7@google.com>

Hi Matthias,

Am 21.12.22 um 17:50 schrieb Matthias Kaehlcke:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 01:29:25PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> Am 20.12.22 um 23:50 schrieb Matthias Kaehlcke:
>>> Today I learned that regulator_get() doesn't return an error when the regulator
>>> isn't specified, but the 'dummy regulator'. With that the platform driver is
>>> instantiated, which is not intended. The proper fix is probably to skip the
>>> creation of the 'raw' platform device in onboard_hub_create_pdevs() when the
>>> 'vdd-supply' does not exist.
>> Yes, i can confirm this by debugfs:
>>
>>   regulator                      use open bypass  opmode voltage current
>> min     max
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   regulator-dummy                  8    7      0 unknown 0mV     0mA
>> 0mV     0mV
>>      serial0-0-vddio 1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV
>>      serial0-0-vbat 1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV
>>      3f980000.usb:usb-port@1:usb-port@1-vdd 1
>> 0mA     0mV     0mV
>>      3f980000.usb:usb-port@1-vdd 1                                 0mA
>> 0mV     0mV
>>      3f980000.usb-vusb_a 1                                 0mA     0mV
>> 0mV
>>      3f980000.usb-vusb_d 1                                 0mA     0mV
>> 0mV
>>      phy-vcc 1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV
>>
>>> I tried to repro the Rpi 3 case by adjusting sc7280-herobrine.dtsi to look
>>> somewhat similar to the Rpi 3 hub config, but so far I wasn't 'successful'
>>> with breaking USB by deleting 'vdd-supply' (and 'peer-hub'). So I don't fully
>>> understand your scenario, but I'm relatively confident that not creating the
>>> platform devices should fix it.
>> I just played a little bit with arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-lan7515.dtsi
>> and removed only the second hub node (including ethernet chip). After this
>> the issue also doesn't occur without any modification to onboard-usb-hub. So
>> it seems to me that the real issue is caused by the cascade of 2x Microchip
>> USB2514B USB 2.0 hubs.
> Thanks for your debugging efforts.
>
> I did some limited testing with nested hubs during development of the
> driver, using an external hub as alleged 2nd level onboard hub. I went
> back to such a configuration, unfortunately I still can't repro what
> you are seeing :(
>
>> Here are the relevant kernel log entries:
>>
>> [    4.025150] dwc2 3f980000.usb: supply vusb_d not found, using dummy
>> regulator
>> [    4.038776] dwc2 3f980000.usb: supply vusb_a not found, using dummy
>> regulator
>> [    4.104207] dwc2 3f980000.usb: DWC OTG Controller
>> [    4.115852] dwc2 3f980000.usb: new USB bus registered, assigned bus
>> number 1
>> [    4.129921] dwc2 3f980000.usb: irq 66, io mem 0x3f980000
>> [    4.513217] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using dwc2
>> [    5.123296] usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using dwc2
>> [    5.623217] usb 1-1.3: new low-speed USB device number 4 using dwc2
>> [    5.785049] input: HID 046a:0011 as /devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.3/1-1.3:1.0/0003:046A:0011.0001/input/input0
>> [    5.863240] usb 1-1.1.2: new low-speed USB device number 5 using dwc2
>> [    5.868998] hid-generic 0003:046A:0011.0001: input: USB HID v1.11
>> Keyboard [HID 046a:0011] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.3/input0
>> [    6.031327] input: PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse as /devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0/0003:045E:00CB.0002/input/input1
>> [    6.031490] hid-generic 0003:045E:00CB.0002: input: USB HID v1.11 Mouse
>> [PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.1.2/input0
>> [    6.333278] usb 1-1.1.1: new high-speed USB device number 6 using dwc2
>> [   24.165633] usbcore: registered new interface driver lan78xx
>> [   24.423801] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1: supply vdd not
>> found, using dummy regulator
>> [   24.424202] usbcore: registered new device driver onboard-usb-hub
>> [   24.424376] usb 1-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3
>> [   24.424385] usb 1-1.1.1: USB disconnect, device number 6
>> [   24.564921] usb 1-1.1.2: USB disconnect, device number 5
>> [   24.624696] usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, device number 4
>> [   25.523236] usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 7 using dwc2
>> [   26.143248] usb 1-1.3: new low-speed USB device number 8 using dwc2
>> [   26.305673] input: HID 046a:0011 as /devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.3/1-1.3:1.0/0003:046A:0011.0003/input/input2
>> [   26.374840] hid-generic 0003:046A:0011.0003: input: USB HID v1.11
>> Keyboard [HID 046a:0011] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.3/input0
>> [   26.383241] usb 1-1.1.2: new low-speed USB device number 9 using dwc2
>> [   26.521526] input: PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse as /devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0/0003:045E:00CB.0004/input/input3
>> [   26.522241] hid-generic 0003:045E:00CB.0004: input: USB HID v1.11 Mouse
>> [PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.1.2/input0
>> [   26.833251] usb 1-1.1.1: new high-speed USB device number 10 using dwc2
>>
>> As you can see the input devices are deregistered after probing of
>> onboard-usb-hub and then registered again.
> It looks like the onboard_usb_hub driver is built as a module, which
> is the cause of the de- and re-registration. On a system that actually
> intends to use the onboard_hub driver I would recommand to make it a
> builtin driver to avoid this, but a module driver should still work.
Yes, most of the USB stuff is builtin, but onboard-usb-hub is build as 
module.
> I changed my kernel config to use a onboard_hub module, but that didn't
> help either with reproducing the issue.
>
> Which kernel version are you running on the Rpi 3?

I started with v6.1, then went to v6.0 and then

43993626de00 ("usb: misc: onboard-hub: add support for Microchip 
USB2514B USB 2.0 hub"). All of them showed the issue. The configuration 
based on arm/multi_v7_defconfig. In the last case i need to enable 
ONBOARD_USB_HUB in the configuration.

Based on my observations in v6.1 it wasn't always reproducible (50/50 
chance).

Btw the initial subject wasn't precise only Rpi 3 B Plus is affected.

>
>> The re-registering doesn't happen in the error case (as in my first email).
> Could you add logs to onboard_hub_usbdev_probe() to see whether it is called
> at all and how far it gets? Confirming whether onboard_hub_probe() completes
> successfully might also help.

Sure:

[    7.963910] usbcore: registered new interface driver lan78xx
[    8.231548] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1: 
onboard_hub_probe called
[    8.231590] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1: supply vdd not 
found, using dummy regulator
[    8.231763] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1: 
onboard_hub_probe success
[    8.231867] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1:usb-port@1: 
onboard_hub_probe called
[    8.231880] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1:usb-port@1: 
supply vdd not found, using dummy regulator
[    8.231971] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1:usb-port@1: 
onboard_hub_probe success
[    8.232090] usbcore: registered new device driver onboard-usb-hub
[    8.232256] usb 1-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3
[    8.232264] usb 1-1.1.1: USB disconnect, device number 6
[    8.380602] usb 1-1.1.2: USB disconnect, device number 5
[    8.447421] usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, device number 4

So onboard_hub_probe() is called successfully, but 
onboard_hub_usbdev_probe() doesn't seems to be.

>
>> Also in error case i noticed an unusual high load on the Rpi board, which
>> doesn't occur in good case. Is it possible that both onboard-usb-hub
>> instances are in some kind of deadlock?
> Possibly. The driver itself uses a mutex for locking, which shouldn't result
> in a high load in case of a deadlock, in any case the high load you are
> observing seems to be related with the issue if it is only seen in the error
> case.
I will try to play with lock debugging.
>
> Do things work properly when of_is_onboard_usb_hub() returns always false?
> That would be similar to the fix I have in mind for configs that shouldn't
> use the onboard_hub driver.
[   24.781914] usbcore: registered new device driver onboard-usb-hub
[   24.782097] usb 1-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3
[   24.782110] usb 1-1.1.1: USB disconnect, device number 6
[   24.916725] usb 1-1.1.2: USB disconnect, device number 5
[   25.011118] usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, device number 4
[   25.648211] onboard-usb-hub 1-1: onboard_hub_usbdev_probe called
[   25.648259] onboard-usb-hub 1-1: failed to find device node for peer hub
[   25.648264] onboard-usb-hub: probe of 1-1 failed with error -22
[   25.965643] usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 7 using dwc2
[   26.107578] onboard-usb-hub 1-1.1: onboard_hub_usbdev_probe called
[   26.107636] onboard-usb-hub 1-1.1: failed to find device node for 
peer hub
[   26.107642] onboard-usb-hub: probe of 1-1.1 failed with error -22
[   26.415691] usb 1-1.3: new low-speed USB device number 8 using dwc2
[   26.567393] input: HID 046a:0011 as 
/devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.3/1-1.3:1.0/0003:046A:0011.0003/input/input2
[   26.637183] hid-generic 0003:046A:0011.0003: input: USB HID v1.11 
Keyboard [HID 046a:0011] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.3/input0
[   26.645694] usb 1-1.1.2: new low-speed USB device number 9 using dwc2
[   26.793634] input: PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse as 
/devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0/0003:045E:00CB.0004/input/input3
[   26.793859] hid-generic 0003:045E:00CB.0004: input: USB HID v1.11 
Mouse [PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.1.2/input0
[   27.135695] usb 1-1.1.1: new high-speed USB device number 10 using dwc2

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-21 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-18 13:35 Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3 Stefan Wahren
2022-12-19 10:41 ` Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-19 17:44 ` Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3 Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-19 22:32   ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-20  0:30     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-20 16:19       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-20 22:50         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-21 12:29           ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-21 16:50             ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-21 18:00               ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2022-12-21 19:02                 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-21 21:31                   ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-22  0:55                     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-22 11:19                       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-27 13:15                     ` Stefan Wahren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a170314-6082-f3ba-cfb4-c19d7eb576c0@i2se.com \
    --to=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.