All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:29:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dde8b5e1-fbce-dd6c-6047-09e03ff2c00d@i2se.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6I8L45rDhqBMfUZ@google.com>

Hi Matthias,

Am 20.12.22 um 23:50 schrieb Matthias Kaehlcke:
>
> Today I learned that regulator_get() doesn't return an error when the regulator
> isn't specified, but the 'dummy regulator'. With that the platform driver is
> instantiated, which is not intended. The proper fix is probably to skip the
> creation of the 'raw' platform device in onboard_hub_create_pdevs() when the
> 'vdd-supply' does not exist.

Yes, i can confirm this by debugfs:

  regulator                      use open bypass  opmode voltage 
current     min     max
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  regulator-dummy                  8    7      0 unknown 0mV     0mA     
0mV     0mV
     serial0-0-vddio 1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV
     serial0-0-vbat 1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV
     3f980000.usb:usb-port@1:usb-port@1-vdd 
1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV
     3f980000.usb:usb-port@1-vdd 1                                 
0mA     0mV     0mV
     3f980000.usb-vusb_a 1                                 0mA     
0mV     0mV
     3f980000.usb-vusb_d 1                                 0mA     
0mV     0mV
     phy-vcc 1                                 0mA     0mV     0mV

>
> I tried to repro the Rpi 3 case by adjusting sc7280-herobrine.dtsi to look
> somewhat similar to the Rpi 3 hub config, but so far I wasn't 'successful'
> with breaking USB by deleting 'vdd-supply' (and 'peer-hub'). So I don't fully
> understand your scenario, but I'm relatively confident that not creating the
> platform devices should fix it.

I just played a little bit with 
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x-rpi-lan7515.dtsi and removed only the second 
hub node (including ethernet chip). After this the issue also doesn't 
occur without any modification to onboard-usb-hub. So it seems to me 
that the real issue is caused by the cascade of 2x Microchip USB2514B 
USB 2.0 hubs.

Here are the relevant kernel log entries:

[    4.025150] dwc2 3f980000.usb: supply vusb_d not found, using dummy 
regulator
[    4.038776] dwc2 3f980000.usb: supply vusb_a not found, using dummy 
regulator
[    4.104207] dwc2 3f980000.usb: DWC OTG Controller
[    4.115852] dwc2 3f980000.usb: new USB bus registered, assigned bus 
number 1
[    4.129921] dwc2 3f980000.usb: irq 66, io mem 0x3f980000
[    4.513217] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using dwc2
[    5.123296] usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using dwc2
[    5.623217] usb 1-1.3: new low-speed USB device number 4 using dwc2
[    5.785049] input: HID 046a:0011 as 
/devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.3/1-1.3:1.0/0003:046A:0011.0001/input/input0
[    5.863240] usb 1-1.1.2: new low-speed USB device number 5 using dwc2
[    5.868998] hid-generic 0003:046A:0011.0001: input: USB HID v1.11 
Keyboard [HID 046a:0011] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.3/input0
[    6.031327] input: PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse as 
/devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0/0003:045E:00CB.0002/input/input1
[    6.031490] hid-generic 0003:045E:00CB.0002: input: USB HID v1.11 
Mouse [PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.1.2/input0
[    6.333278] usb 1-1.1.1: new high-speed USB device number 6 using dwc2
[   24.165633] usbcore: registered new interface driver lan78xx
[   24.423801] onboard-usb-hub 3f980000.usb:usb-port@1: supply vdd not 
found, using dummy regulator
[   24.424202] usbcore: registered new device driver onboard-usb-hub
[   24.424376] usb 1-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3
[   24.424385] usb 1-1.1.1: USB disconnect, device number 6
[   24.564921] usb 1-1.1.2: USB disconnect, device number 5
[   24.624696] usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, device number 4
[   25.523236] usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 7 using dwc2
[   26.143248] usb 1-1.3: new low-speed USB device number 8 using dwc2
[   26.305673] input: HID 046a:0011 as 
/devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.3/1-1.3:1.0/0003:046A:0011.0003/input/input2
[   26.374840] hid-generic 0003:046A:0011.0003: input: USB HID v1.11 
Keyboard [HID 046a:0011] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.3/input0
[   26.383241] usb 1-1.1.2: new low-speed USB device number 9 using dwc2
[   26.521526] input: PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse as 
/devices/platform/soc/3f980000.usb/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0/0003:045E:00CB.0004/input/input3
[   26.522241] hid-generic 0003:045E:00CB.0004: input: USB HID v1.11 
Mouse [PixArt Microsoft USB Optical Mouse] on usb-3f980000.usb-1.1.2/input0
[   26.833251] usb 1-1.1.1: new high-speed USB device number 10 using dwc2

As you can see the input devices are deregistered after probing of 
onboard-usb-hub and then registered again. The re-registering doesn't 
happen in the error case (as in my first email). Also in error case i 
noticed an unusual high load on the Rpi board, which doesn't occur in 
good case. Is it possible that both onboard-usb-hub instances are in 
some kind of deadlock?

>
> I'll try to send out a v2 of the fix before disappearing over the holidays
> after tomorrow.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-21 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-18 13:35 Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3 Stefan Wahren
2022-12-19 10:41 ` Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-19 17:44 ` Regression: onboard-usb-hub breaks USB on RPi 3 Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-19 22:32   ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-20  0:30     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-20 16:19       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-20 22:50         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-21 12:29           ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2022-12-21 16:50             ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-21 18:00               ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-21 19:02                 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-21 21:31                   ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-22  0:55                     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-12-22 11:19                       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-12-27 13:15                     ` Stefan Wahren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dde8b5e1-fbce-dd6c-6047-09e03ff2c00d@i2se.com \
    --to=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.