All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, will@kernel.org,
	qperret@google.com, tabba@google.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
	russell.king@oracle.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	elver@google.com, keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 08:30:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d4a513o.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715061027.1612149-12-kaleshsingh@google.com>

On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 07:10:20 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Add stub implementations of non-protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
> building. These are implemented later in this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> index 1eac4e57f2ae..36cf7858ddd8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@
>   *      the HYP memory. The stack is unwinded in EL2 and dumped to a shared
>   *      buffer where the host can read and print the stacktrace.
>   *
> + *   2) Non-protected nVHE mode - the host can directly access the
> + *      HYP stack pages and unwind the HYP stack in EL1. This saves having
> + *      to allocate shared buffers for the host to read the unwinded
> + *      stacktrace.
> + *
> + *
>   * Copyright (C) 2022 Google LLC
>   */
>  #ifndef __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H
> @@ -53,5 +59,21 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE */
>  
> +/*
> + * Non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
> + */
> +#else	/* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */

I don't get this path. This either represents the VHE hypervisor or
the kernel proper. Which one is it?

> +static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> +				     struct stack_info *info)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
> +
>  #endif	/* __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
>  #endif	/* __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H */

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	ast@kernel.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, kernel-team@android.com, elver@google.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	russell.king@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 08:30:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d4a513o.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715061027.1612149-12-kaleshsingh@google.com>

On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 07:10:20 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Add stub implementations of non-protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
> building. These are implemented later in this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> index 1eac4e57f2ae..36cf7858ddd8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@
>   *      the HYP memory. The stack is unwinded in EL2 and dumped to a shared
>   *      buffer where the host can read and print the stacktrace.
>   *
> + *   2) Non-protected nVHE mode - the host can directly access the
> + *      HYP stack pages and unwind the HYP stack in EL1. This saves having
> + *      to allocate shared buffers for the host to read the unwinded
> + *      stacktrace.
> + *
> + *
>   * Copyright (C) 2022 Google LLC
>   */
>  #ifndef __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H
> @@ -53,5 +59,21 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE */
>  
> +/*
> + * Non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
> + */
> +#else	/* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */

I don't get this path. This either represents the VHE hypervisor or
the kernel proper. Which one is it?

> +static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> +				     struct stack_info *info)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
> +
>  #endif	/* __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
>  #endif	/* __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H */

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, will@kernel.org,
	qperret@google.com, tabba@google.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
	russell.king@oracle.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	elver@google.com, keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 08:30:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d4a513o.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715061027.1612149-12-kaleshsingh@google.com>

On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 07:10:20 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Add stub implementations of non-protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
> building. These are implemented later in this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> index 1eac4e57f2ae..36cf7858ddd8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@
>   *      the HYP memory. The stack is unwinded in EL2 and dumped to a shared
>   *      buffer where the host can read and print the stacktrace.
>   *
> + *   2) Non-protected nVHE mode - the host can directly access the
> + *      HYP stack pages and unwind the HYP stack in EL1. This saves having
> + *      to allocate shared buffers for the host to read the unwinded
> + *      stacktrace.
> + *
> + *
>   * Copyright (C) 2022 Google LLC
>   */
>  #ifndef __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H
> @@ -53,5 +59,21 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE */
>  
> +/*
> + * Non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
> + */
> +#else	/* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */

I don't get this path. This either represents the VHE hypervisor or
the kernel proper. Which one is it?

> +static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> +				     struct stack_info *info)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
> +
>  #endif	/* __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
>  #endif	/* __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H */

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-15  6:10 [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 12:37   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 12:37     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 12:37     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 13:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 12:52   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-07-18 12:52     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-07-18 12:52     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-07-18 15:26     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 15:26       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 15:26       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 16:00       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-07-18 16:00         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-07-18 16:00         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out on_accessible_stack_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 13:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 16:28   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 16:28     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 16:28     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 13:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 16:29   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 16:29     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 16:29     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 13:56   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:56     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:56     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 17:40     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:40       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:40       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 13:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:58     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 13:59   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:59     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:59     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-17  9:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-17  9:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-17  9:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 16:53     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 16:53       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 16:53       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18  9:46   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18  9:46     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18  9:46     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18  6:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  6:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  6:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 17:03     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:03       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:03       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-19 10:35       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-19 10:35         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-19 10:35         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-19 18:23         ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-19 18:23           ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-19 18:23           ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] KVM: arm64: Allocate shared pKVM hyp stacktrace buffers Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18  7:13   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  7:13     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  7:13     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 17:27     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:27       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:27       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 10:00   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 10:00     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 10:00     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18  7:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  7:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  7:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE " Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18  7:30   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-07-18  7:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  7:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 16:51     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 16:51       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 16:51       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 16:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 16:57         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 16:57         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] KVM: arm64: Save protected-nVHE (pKVM) hyp stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18  9:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  9:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18  9:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-18 17:32     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:32       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:32       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 10:07   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 10:07     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 10:07     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-18 17:36     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:36       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-18 17:36       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected " Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] KVM: arm64: Dump nVHE hypervisor stack on panic Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15  6:10   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:55   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 13:55   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-15 18:58   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 18:58     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-15 18:58     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-16  0:04     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-16  0:04       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-16  0:04       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-19 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-19 10:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-19 10:43   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877d4a513o.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=russell.king@oracle.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.