Re: Boot failure regression on 6.0.10 stable kernel on iMX7 #forregzbot

[Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>]

[Note: this mail contains only information relevant for regzbot, the
Linux kernel regression tracking bot. That's why I removed most
recipients of the quoted mail and only left what looked like a mailing
lists. These mails contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them
easy to spot and filter out.]

On 30.11.22 14:52, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> it looks like commit 753395ea1e45 ("ARM: dts: imx7: Fix NAND controller
> size-cells"), that was backported to stable 6.0.10, introduce a boot
> regression on colibri-imx7, at least.
> [...]

Thanks for the report. To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the
cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression
tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced 753395ea1e45
#regzbot title ARM: dts: imx7: Boot failure on iMX7
#regzbot ignore-activity

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
telling regzbot about it, as explained here:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/

Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
pointing to the report (the mail this one replies to), as explained for
in the Linux kernel's documentation; above webpage explains why this is
important for tracked regressions.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.