[alsa-devel] [PATCH 9/9] ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at soc_cleanup_card_resources()

[Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>]

From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both
card and component.
Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired
soc_cleanup_card_resources().

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
 sound/soc/soc-core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index 927b9c9..0bed63e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -1940,6 +1940,8 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 		card->snd_card = NULL;
 	}
 
+	snd_soc_dapm_shutdown(card);
+
 	/* remove and free each DAI */
 	soc_remove_link_dais(card);
 	soc_remove_link_components(card);
@@ -2377,7 +2379,6 @@ static void snd_soc_unbind_card(struct snd_soc_card *card, bool unregister)
 {
 	if (card->instantiated) {
 		card->instantiated = false;
-		snd_soc_dapm_shutdown(card);
 		snd_soc_flush_all_delayed_work(card);
 
 		soc_cleanup_card_resources(card);
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel