Re: [regression] Bug 217069 - Wake on Lan is broken on r8169 since 6.2

[Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn>]

On 2023/3/25 下午9:31, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 24.03.23 11:09, Jianmin Lv wrote:
>> Please try the following patch:
>> https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/784/commits/0e66e6aae972dac3833bdcbd223aa6a8b1733176
> 
> To interact with the reporters, please comment here:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069
> 
> Sorry, I wish it was different, but I can't CC the reporters here
> without their permission, because bugzilla.kernel.org tells users upon
> registration their "email address will never be displayed to logged out
> users".
> 
> FWIW, I forwarded your request yesterday and one reporter commented that
> it didn't help. But having me as a man-in-the-middle is not a good idea.
> 

Ok, I has transformed and adjusted the patch from ACPICA and post it 
into https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069.

Thanks!

> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
> 
>> On 2023/3/24 下午5:50, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>> Hi, Thorsten,
>>>
>>> I'm sorry I ignored this email, and Jianmin, could you please
>>> investigate this problem? Thank you.
>>>
>>> Huacai
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:46 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
>>> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 19.03.23 08:20, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22.02.23 08:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
>>>>>> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
>>>>>> mail. Quoting from
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069 :
>>>>>
>>>>> An issue that looked like a network bug was now bisected and it turns
>>>>> out it's cause by 5c62d5aab875 ("ACPICA: Events: Support fixed PCIe
>>>>> wake
>>>>> event") which Huacai Chen provided. Could you take a look at the ticket
>>>>> linked above?
>>>>
>>>> Huacai Chen, did you look into this? Would be good to have this
>>>> regression fixed rather sooner than later, as it seems to annoy quite a
>>>> few people.
>>>>
>>>> Should we maybe simply revert the problematic change for now and reapply
>>>> it later once the root-issue was found and fixed?
>>>>
>>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>>>> -- 
>>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>>>
>>>> #regzbot poke
>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, the whole story started like this:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ivan Ivanich 2023-02-22 00:51:52 UTC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After upgrade to 6.2 having issues with wake on lan on 2 systems: -
>>>>>>> first is an old lenovo laptop from 2012(Ivy Bridge) with realtek
>>>>>>> network adapter - second is a PC(Haswell refresh) with PCIE realtek
>>>>>>> network adapter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both uses r8169 driver for network.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On laptop it's not possible to wake on lan after poweroff On PC it's
>>>>>>> not possible to wake on lan up after hibernate but works after
>>>>>>> poweroff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In both cases downgrade to 6.1.x kernel fixes the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile a few others that ran into the same problem with NICs from
>>>>> different vendors joined the ticket
>>>>>
>>>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker'
>>>>> hat)
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>
>>
>>