* [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
@ 2019-07-29 7:55 Mukesh Ojha
2019-07-30 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mukesh Ojha @ 2019-07-29 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck, rcu, linux-kernel; +Cc: Mukesh Ojha
There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h,
fix this.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
* other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section,
* the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately.
*
- * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited
+ * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited
* implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is
* thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact, if
* you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
2019-07-29 7:55 [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great" Mukesh Ojha
@ 2019-07-30 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2019-07-30 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mukesh Ojha; +Cc: rcu, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:25:57PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h,
> fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Queued, thank you very much!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> * other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section,
> * the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately.
> *
> - * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited
> + * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited
> * implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is
> * thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact, if
> * you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure
> --
> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
> Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-30 16:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-29 7:55 [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great" Mukesh Ojha
2019-07-30 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).