[PATCH] docs: Fix typo in Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst

[PATCH] docs: Fix typo in Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst

[Lin Yu Chen]

This commit corrects the spelling of "not" to "note" to accurately
convey the intended meaning.

Signed-off-by: Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
 	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
 
-	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
+	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
 	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
 	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
 
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix typo in Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:13:41AM -0700, Lin Yu Chen wrote:
> This commit corrects the spelling of "not" to "note" to accurately
> convey the intended meaning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@gmail.com>

Good eyes, thank you!

However, Qiuxu Zhuo beat you to this one, please see this commit
in the -rcu tree:

e5ad8b68f8d4 ("Documentation/RCU: s/not/note/ in checklist.rst")

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
>  	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
>  	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
>  
> -	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
> +	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
>  	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
>  	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>