regressions.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [regression] mhi: ath11k resume fails on some devices
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:30:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210924100034.GC19050@workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZdPi8P7YZPhPir+WfS3cY_a7He1m2Pq2uqBhczPdEeoNRb0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:43:55AM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> Hi Kalle,
> 
> On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 10:36, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> writes:
> >
> > > Hi Kalle,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 10:00, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Loic and Mani,
> > >>
> > >> I hate to be the bearer of bad news again :)
> > >>
> > >> I noticed already a while ago that commit 020d3b26c07a ("bus: mhi: Early
> > >> MHI resume failure in non M3 state"), introduced in v5.13-rc1, broke
> > >> ath11k resume on my NUC x86 testbox using QCA6390. Interestingly enough
> > >> Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop (with QCA6390 as well) does not have this
> > >> problem, I only see the problem on the NUC. I do not know what's causing
> > >> this difference.
> > >
> > > I suppose the NUC is current PCI-Express power during suspend while
> > > the laptop maintains PCIe/M2 power.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not able to parse that sentence. Can you elaborate more?
> 
> Ouch, yes, I wanted to say that the NUC does not maintain the power of
> PCI express during suspend (leading to PCI D3cold state), whereas the
> laptop maintains the power of the M2 card... well, not sure now I see
> your logs.
> 
> >
> > >> At the moment I'm running my tests with commit 020d3b26c07a reverted and
> > >> everything works without problems. Is there a simple way to fix this? Or
> > >> maybe we should just revert the commit? Commit log and kernel logs from
> > >> a failing case below.
> > >
> > > Do you have log of success case?
> >
> > A log from a successful case in the end of email, using v5.15-rc1 plus
> > revert of commit 020d3b26c07abe27.
> >
> > > To me, the device loses power, that is why MHI resuming is failing.
> > > Normally the device should be properly recovered/reinitialized. Before
> > > that patch the power loss was simply not detected (or handled at
> > > higher stack level).
> >
> > Currently in ath11k we always keep the firmware running when in suspend,
> > this is a workaround due to problems between mac80211 and MHI stack.
> > IIRC the problem was something related MHI creating struct device during
> > resume or something like that.
> 
> Could you give a try with the attached patch? It should solve your
> issue without breaking modem support.
> 

It will... But we should first try to see what is causing the device to
be in MHI RESET state. We can't add a force resume case without knowing
the rootcause.

And for workaround, we can proceed resume if device is in RESET state
adding a comment on why. But let's first get the MHI debug logs.

> Regards,
> Loic



  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16  8:00 Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 10:18 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-16 11:12   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
     [not found]     ` <CAMZdPi94607mZorp+Zmkw3seWXak6p9Jr05CQ5hhfgKQoG8n7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2021-09-16 16:35       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-16 16:42         ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 17:19           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-23  8:34             ` Carl Huang
2021-09-23  8:59               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-23  9:26                 ` Carl Huang
2021-09-23 10:50                   ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-24  9:07                 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-24  9:57                   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-07  9:55                     ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-21 10:01                       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-24  8:36   ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-24  9:43     ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-24 10:00       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-10-07  9:48       ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-19 12:12         ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-21 10:03           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-11-12 11:36             ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-18 17:41             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-01  7:34               ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-09-25 17:40 ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210924100034.GC19050@workstation \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --subject='Re: [regression] mhi: ath11k resume fails on some devices' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).