regressions.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable
@ 2023-03-20  6:19 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
  2023-03-20  6:45 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) @ 2023-03-20  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH
  Cc: Linux kernel regressions list, stable, LKML, Bart Van Assche,
	scsi, Martin K. Petersen, James E.J. Bottomley

Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it
looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host
directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable
tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all
stable series last week.

Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added
it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any
difference.)

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable
  2023-03-20  6:19 Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
@ 2023-03-20  6:45 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
  2023-03-20  8:47   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) @ 2023-03-20  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH
  Cc: Linux kernel regressions list, stable, LKML, Bart Van Assche,
	scsi, Martin K. Petersen, James E.J. Bottomley

On 20.03.23 07:19, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it
> looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host
> directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable
> tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all
> stable series last week.
> 
> Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added
> it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any
> difference.)

Sorry, ignore that, I noticed that fix is already in your queue (I
looked at it before writing that mail, but it seems I somehow missed it
and only noticed now; sorry for the noise).

Ciao, Thorsten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable
  2023-03-20  6:45 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
@ 2023-03-20  8:47   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2023-03-20  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux regressions mailing list
  Cc: stable, LKML, Bart Van Assche, scsi, Martin K. Petersen,
	James E.J. Bottomley

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:45:04AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 20.03.23 07:19, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it
> > looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host
> > directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable
> > tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all
> > stable series last week.
> > 
> > Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added
> > it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any
> > difference.)
> 
> Sorry, ignore that, I noticed that fix is already in your queue (I
> looked at it before writing that mail, but it seems I somehow missed it
> and only noticed now; sorry for the noise).

It's not noise, verifying that we actually picked up known fixes is
good, I'd much rather a few "do you really have this fix" emails get
sent than not sent at all and we miss things.

And I just checked, yes, if Sasha hadn't picked this up with his
scripts, my scripts would have caught it as well, so it was a good test
that our independant processes are working.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-20  8:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-20  6:19 Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-20  6:45 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-20  8:47   ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).