rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] docs: rust: extend abstraction and binding documentation
@ 2024-04-18  7:06 Dirk Behme
  2024-04-18 11:55 ` Benno Lossin
  2024-05-05 22:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Behme @ 2024-04-18  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rust-for-linux; +Cc: Dirk Behme, Valentin Obst, Trevor Gross, Miguel Ojeda

Add some basics explained by Miguel in [1] to the documentation.
And connect it with some hints where this is implemented in the
kernel.

[1] https://www.linuxfoundation.org/webinars/rust-for-linux-writing-abstractions-and-drivers

Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
---
 Documentation/rust/general-information.rst | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)

Changes in v4: Rebase against rust-dev v6.9-rc1 to re-start this topic. If
               the reviewers are too busy and its not a good time for it
               just let me know :)

diff --git a/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst b/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
index 081397827a7e..6c6fb3a5e318 100644
--- a/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
+++ b/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
@@ -64,6 +64,62 @@ but it is intended that coverage is expanded as time goes on. "Leaf" modules
 (e.g. drivers) should not use the C bindings directly. Instead, subsystems
 should provide as-safe-as-possible abstractions as needed.
 
+.. code-block::
+
+	                                                rust/bindings/
+                                                       (rust/helpers.c)
+
+                                                          include/ -----+ <-+
+                                                                        |   |
+         drivers/              rust/kernel/              +----------+ <-+   |
+           fs/                                           | bindgen  |       |
+          .../            +-------------------+          +----------+ --+   |
+                          |    Abstractions   |                         |   |
+       +---------+        | +------+ +------+ |          +----------+   |   |
+       | my_foo  | -----> | | foo  | | bar  | | -------> | Bindings | <-+   |
+       | driver  |  Safe  | | sub- | | sub- | |  Unsafe  |          |       |
+       +---------+        | |system| |system| |          | bindings | <-----+
+            |             | +------+ +------+ |          |  crate   |       |
+            |             |   kernel crate    |          +----------+       |
+            |             +-------------------+                             |
+            |                                                               |
+            +------------------# FORBIDDEN #--------------------------------+
+
+The main idea is to encapsulate all direct interaction with the kernel's C APIs
+into carefully reviewed and documented abstractions. These are then considered to
+be sound. The goal is that users of these abstractions ("my_foo driver") cannot
+introduce undefined behavior (UB) as long as:
+
+#. the abstractions are correct.
+#. they don't use ``unsafe{..}``. Or they uphold the preconditions of all unsafe
+   operations that they perform if they use ``unsafe{..}`` for performance optimizations
+   or to call unsafe abstractions.
+
+Bindings
+~~~~~~~~
+
+By including a C header from ``include/`` into ``rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h``
+the ``bindgen`` tool will auto-generate the bindings for the included subsystem.
+After building, see the ``*_generated.rs`` output files in the ``rust/bindings/``
+directory.
+
+For parts of the C header that ``bindgen`` doesn't auto generate, e.g. C ``inline``
+functions or macros, it is acceptable to add a small wrapper function
+to ``rust/helpers.c`` to make it available for the Rust side as well.
+
+Abstractions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Abstractions are the layer between the bindings and the in-kernel users. They are
+located in ``rust/kernel/`` and their role is to encapsulate the unsafe access
+to the bindings into an as-safe-as-possible API that they expose to their users.
+Users of the abstractions include things like drivers or file systems written in Rust.
+
+Besides the safety aspect, the abstractions are supposed to be "ergonomic", in the
+sense that they turn the C interfaces into "idiomatic" Rust code. Basic examples are
+to turn the C resource acquisition and release into Rust constructors and destructors
+or C integer error codes into Rust's ``Result``.
+
 
 Conditional compilation
 -----------------------
-- 
2.28.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] docs: rust: extend abstraction and binding documentation
  2024-04-18  7:06 [PATCH v4] docs: rust: extend abstraction and binding documentation Dirk Behme
@ 2024-04-18 11:55 ` Benno Lossin
  2024-05-05 22:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benno Lossin @ 2024-04-18 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dirk Behme, rust-for-linux; +Cc: Valentin Obst, Trevor Gross, Miguel Ojeda

On 18.04.24 09:06, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Add some basics explained by Miguel in [1] to the documentation.
> And connect it with some hints where this is implemented in the
> kernel.
> 
> [1] https://www.linuxfoundation.org/webinars/rust-for-linux-writing-abstractions-and-drivers
> 
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/rust/general-information.rst | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> 
> Changes in v4: Rebase against rust-dev v6.9-rc1 to re-start this topic. If
>                the reviewers are too busy and its not a good time for it
>                just let me know :)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst b/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
> index 081397827a7e..6c6fb3a5e318 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
> @@ -64,6 +64,62 @@ but it is intended that coverage is expanded as time goes on. "Leaf" modules
>  (e.g. drivers) should not use the C bindings directly. Instead, subsystems
>  should provide as-safe-as-possible abstractions as needed.
> 
> +.. code-block::
> +
> +	                                                rust/bindings/
> +                                                       (rust/helpers.c)

This needs updating when [1] lands, I don't know if Miguel wants to do
it when picking this, or if you should do this before.

> +
> +                                                          include/ -----+ <-+
> +                                                                        |   |
> +         drivers/              rust/kernel/              +----------+ <-+   |
> +           fs/                                           | bindgen  |       |
> +          .../            +-------------------+          +----------+ --+   |
> +                          |    Abstractions   |                         |   |
> +       +---------+        | +------+ +------+ |          +----------+   |   |
> +       | my_foo  | -----> | | foo  | | bar  | | -------> | Bindings | <-+   |
> +       | driver  |  Safe  | | sub- | | sub- | |  Unsafe  |          |       |
> +       +---------+        | |system| |system| |          | bindings | <-----+
> +            |             | +------+ +------+ |          |  crate   |       |
> +            |             |   kernel crate    |          +----------+       |
> +            |             +-------------------+                             |
> +            |                                                               |
> +            +------------------# FORBIDDEN #--------------------------------+
> +
> +The main idea is to encapsulate all direct interaction with the kernel's C APIs
> +into carefully reviewed and documented abstractions. These are then considered to
> +be sound. The goal is that users of these abstractions ("my_foo driver") cannot
> +introduce undefined behavior (UB) as long as:
> +
> +#. the abstractions are correct.
> +#. they don't use ``unsafe{..}``. Or they uphold the preconditions of all unsafe
> +   operations that they perform if they use ``unsafe{..}`` for performance optimizations
> +   or to call unsafe abstractions.
> +
> +Bindings
> +~~~~~~~~
> +
> +By including a C header from ``include/`` into ``rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h``
> +the ``bindgen`` tool will auto-generate the bindings for the included subsystem.
> +After building, see the ``*_generated.rs`` output files in the ``rust/bindings/``
> +directory.
> +
> +For parts of the C header that ``bindgen`` doesn't auto generate, e.g. C ``inline``
> +functions or macros, it is acceptable to add a small wrapper function
> +to ``rust/helpers.c`` to make it available for the Rust side as well.

Also here.

> +
> +Abstractions
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Abstractions are the layer between the bindings and the in-kernel users. They are
> +located in ``rust/kernel/`` and their role is to encapsulate the unsafe access
> +to the bindings into an as-safe-as-possible API that they expose to their users.
> +Users of the abstractions include things like drivers or file systems written in Rust.
> +
> +Besides the safety aspect, the abstractions are supposed to be "ergonomic", in the
> +sense that they turn the C interfaces into "idiomatic" Rust code. Basic examples are
> +to turn the C resource acquisition and release into Rust constructors and destructors
> +or C integer error codes into Rust's ``Result``.
> +
> 
>  Conditional compilation
>  -----------------------
> --
> 2.28.0
> 
>

Otherwise, this looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240416074607.1395481-1-nmi@metaspace.dk/

-- 
Cheers,
Benno


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] docs: rust: extend abstraction and binding documentation
  2024-04-18  7:06 [PATCH v4] docs: rust: extend abstraction and binding documentation Dirk Behme
  2024-04-18 11:55 ` Benno Lossin
@ 2024-05-05 22:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2024-05-05 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dirk Behme; +Cc: rust-for-linux, Valentin Obst, Trevor Gross, Miguel Ojeda

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:06 AM Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> wrote:
>
> Add some basics explained by Miguel in [1] to the documentation.
> And connect it with some hints where this is implemented in the
> kernel.
>
> [1] https://www.linuxfoundation.org/webinars/rust-for-linux-writing-abstractions-and-drivers
>
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>

[ Reworded first section for better clarity and some minor nits.
Changed link into Link tag, use tabs for code block indentation and
wrap at 80. - Miguel ]

Dirk: please double-check that you are OK with the reword. Thanks!

Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!

Cheers,
Miguel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-05 22:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-18  7:06 [PATCH v4] docs: rust: extend abstraction and binding documentation Dirk Behme
2024-04-18 11:55 ` Benno Lossin
2024-05-05 22:32 ` Miguel Ojeda

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).