selinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16434783-28d0-01d5-d7eb-186d0f6eae63@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626192234.11725-16-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 6/26/19 12:22 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a new entry "display" in /proc/.../attr for controlling
> which LSM security information is displayed for a process.
> The name of an active LSM that supplies hooks for human readable
> data may be written to "display" to set the value. The name of
> the LSM currently in use can be read from "display".
> At this point there can only be one LSM capable of display
> active.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

> ---
>  fs/proc/base.c      |   1 +
>  security/security.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index ddef482f1334..7bf70e041315 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2618,6 +2618,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry attr_dir_stuff[] = {
>  	ATTR(NULL, "fscreate",		0666),
>  	ATTR(NULL, "keycreate",		0666),
>  	ATTR(NULL, "sockcreate",	0666),
> +	ATTR(NULL, "display",		0666),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK
>  	DIR("smack",			0555,
>  	    proc_smack_attr_dir_inode_ops, proc_smack_attr_dir_ops),
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 3180a6f30625..82e29c477fa4 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *lsm_file_cache;
>  static struct kmem_cache *lsm_inode_cache;
>  
>  char *lsm_names;
> -static struct lsm_blob_sizes blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init;
> +static struct lsm_blob_sizes blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> +	.lbs_task = sizeof(int),	/* slot number for the "display" LSM */
> +};
>  
>  /* Boot-time LSM user choice */
>  static __initdata const char *chosen_lsm_order;
> @@ -423,8 +425,10 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
>  
>  /*
>   * Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
> + * Pointers to the LSM id structures for local use.
>   */
>  static int lsm_slot;
> +static struct lsm_id *lsm_slotlist[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
>  
>  /**
>   * security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
> @@ -444,6 +448,7 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
>  	if (lsmid->slot == LSMBLOB_NEEDED) {
>  		if (lsm_slot >= LSMBLOB_ENTRIES)
>  			panic("%s Too many LSMs registered.\n", __func__);
> +		lsm_slotlist[lsm_slot] = lsmid;
>  		lsmid->slot = lsm_slot++;
>  		init_debug("%s assigned lsmblob slot %d\n", lsmid->lsm,
>  			   lsmid->slot);
> @@ -564,6 +569,8 @@ int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
>   */
>  static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> +	int *display;
> +
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_task == 0) {
>  		task->security = NULL;
>  		return 0;
> @@ -572,6 +579,15 @@ static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
>  	task->security = kzalloc(blob_sizes.lbs_task, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (task->security == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The start of the task blob contains the "display" LSM slot number.
> +	 * Start with it set to the invalid slot number, indicating that the
> +	 * default first registered LSM be displayed.
> +	 */
> +	display = task->security;
> +	*display = LSMBLOB_INVALID;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1563,14 +1579,24 @@ int security_file_open(struct file *file)
>  
>  int security_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long clone_flags)
>  {
> +	int *odisplay = current->security;
> +	int *ndisplay;
>  	int rc = lsm_task_alloc(task);
>  
> -	if (rc)
> +	if (unlikely(rc))
>  		return rc;
> +
>  	rc = call_int_hook(task_alloc, 0, task, clone_flags);
> -	if (unlikely(rc))
> +	if (unlikely(rc)) {
>  		security_task_free(task);
> -	return rc;
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	ndisplay = task->security;
> +	if (ndisplay && odisplay)
> +		*ndisplay = *odisplay;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
> @@ -1967,10 +1993,29 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *lsm, char *name,
>  				char **value)
>  {
>  	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +	int *display = current->security;
> +	int slot = 0;
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(name, "display")) {
> +		/*
> +		 * lsm_slot will be 0 if there are no displaying modules.
> +		 */
> +		if (lsm_slot == 0)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		if (*display != LSMBLOB_INVALID)
> +			slot = *display;
> +		*value = kstrdup(lsm_slotlist[slot]->lsm, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (*value)
> +			return strlen(*value);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
>  
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list) {
>  		if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsmid->lsm))
>  			continue;
> +		if (lsm == NULL && *display != LSMBLOB_INVALID &&
> +		    *display != hp->lsmid->slot)
> +			continue;
>  		return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
>  	}
>  	return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1980,10 +2025,46 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
>  			 size_t size)
>  {
>  	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +	char *term;
> +	char *cp;
> +	int *display = current->security;
> +	int rc = -EINVAL;
> +	int slot = 0;
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(name, "display")) {
> +		/*
> +		 * lsm_slot will be 0 if there are no displaying modules.
> +		 */
> +		if (lsm_slot == 0 || size == 0)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		cp = kzalloc(size + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (cp == NULL)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		memcpy(cp, value, size);
> +
> +		term = strchr(cp, ' ');
> +		if (term == NULL)
> +			term = strchr(cp, '\n');
> +		if (term != NULL)
> +			*term = '\0';
> +
> +		for (slot = 0; slot < lsm_slot; slot++)
> +			if (!strcmp(cp, lsm_slotlist[slot]->lsm)) {
> +				*display = lsm_slotlist[slot]->slot;
> +				rc = size;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +		kfree(cp);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
>  
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.setprocattr, list) {
>  		if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsmid->lsm))
>  			continue;
> +		if (lsm == NULL && *display != LSMBLOB_INVALID &&
> +		    *display != hp->lsmid->slot)
> +			continue;
>  		return hp->hook.setprocattr(name, value, size);
>  	}
>  	return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2003,15 +2084,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_ismaclabel);
>  int security_secid_to_secctx(struct lsmblob *blob, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
>  {
>  	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> -	int rc;
> +	int *display = current->security;
>  
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx, list) {
>  		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
>  			continue;
> -		rc = hp->hook.secid_to_secctx(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
> -					      secdata, seclen);
> -		if (rc != 0)
> -			return rc;
> +		if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->lsmid->slot)
> +			return hp->hook.secid_to_secctx(
> +					blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
> +					secdata, seclen);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2021,16 +2102,15 @@ int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
>  			     struct lsmblob *blob)
>  {
>  	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> -	int rc;
> +	int *display = current->security;
>  
>  	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
>  	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secctx_to_secid, list) {
>  		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
>  			continue;
> -		rc = hp->hook.secctx_to_secid(secdata, seclen,
> -					      &blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
> -		if (rc != 0)
> -			return rc;
> +		if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->lsmid->slot)
> +			return hp->hook.secctx_to_secid(secdata, seclen,
> +						&blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2038,7 +2118,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secctx_to_secid);
>  
>  void security_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen)
>  {
> -	call_void_hook(release_secctx, secdata, seclen);
> +	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +	int *display = current->security;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.release_secctx, list)
> +		if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID ||
> +		    *display == hp->lsmid->slot) {
> +			hp->hook.release_secctx(secdata, seclen);
> +			return;
> +		}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_release_secctx);
>  
> @@ -2163,8 +2251,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sock_rcv_skb);
>  int security_socket_getpeersec_stream(struct socket *sock, char __user *optval,
>  				      int __user *optlen, unsigned len)
>  {
> -	return call_int_hook(socket_getpeersec_stream, -ENOPROTOOPT, sock,
> -				optval, optlen, len);
> +	int *display = current->security;
> +	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.socket_getpeersec_stream,
> +			     list)
> +		if (*display == LSMBLOB_INVALID || *display == hp->lsmid->slot)
> +			return hp->hook.socket_getpeersec_stream(sock, optval,
> +								 optlen, len);
> +	return -ENOPROTOOPT;
>  }
>  
>  int security_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock, struct sk_buff *skb,
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-27 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-26 19:22 [PATCH v4 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:39   ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 17:43     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:45   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:47   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] net: Prepare UDS for secuirty module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:48   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:50   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:51   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:08   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:53   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:08   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:55   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:08   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:56   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:09   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:57   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:09   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:58   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:12   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:33   ` John Johansen [this message]
2019-06-28 14:45   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-28 16:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-28 18:08       ` John Johansen
     [not found]       ` <CAB9W1A1nwE7WBZqTe-GV8xNb83_B2ybV7cco++nfMjtDz9NJrg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-29  1:01         ` Fwd: " Stephen Smalley
2019-06-29 19:45           ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-02  0:49           ` James Morris
2019-07-02  1:20             ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:14   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:34   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] " Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:15   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27  3:53   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 16:29     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 17:17       ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 17:36         ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 21:34   ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 21:36     ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:15   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:34   ` John Johansen
2019-06-28 10:07   ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:16   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:36   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:16   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:37   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] Audit: Store LSM audit information in an lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:16   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:37   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:18   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:38   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:18   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27  2:22   ` James Morris
2019-06-27  3:28     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27  3:44     ` John Johansen
2019-06-27  3:49       ` James Morris
2019-06-27 21:38   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 21:04 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Kees Cook
2019-06-26 21:11   ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 23:04     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 21:25   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27  2:41 ` James Morris
2019-06-27  2:46   ` James Morris
2019-06-27  3:45     ` James Morris
2019-06-27  4:10       ` James Morris
2019-06-27 17:07         ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 18:10           ` James Morris
2019-06-27  3:51     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:52 ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 22:33   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 23:16   ` James Morris
2019-06-27 23:44     ` John Johansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16434783-28d0-01d5-d7eb-186d0f6eae63@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).