selinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH 28/59] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks
Date: Tue,  9 Apr 2019 12:58:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409195924.1509-29-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409195924.1509-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Replace the lsm_export scaffolding in xt_SECMARK.c
This raises an issue, in that Smack users have been
using SECMARK_MODE_SEL, which is suppoed to be exclusively
for SELinux. This is worked around in the code, but not
fully addressed.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
index 2def8d8898e6..9a2a97c200a2 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
 	info->secctx[SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX - 1] = '\0';
 	info->secid = 0;
 
+	lsm_export_init(&le);
 	err = security_secctx_to_secid(info->secctx, strlen(info->secctx), &le);
 	if (err) {
 		if (err == -EINVAL)
@@ -63,7 +64,12 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	lsm_export_secid(&le, &info->secid);
+	/* Smack is cheating, using SECMARK_MODE_SEL */
+	if (le.selinux)
+		info->secid = le.selinux;
+	else
+		info->secid = le.smack;
+
 	if (!info->secid) {
 		pr_info_ratelimited("unable to map security context \'%s\'\n",
 				    info->secctx);
-- 
2.19.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-09 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-09 19:58 [PATCH 00/59] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 01/59] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 02/59] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 03/59] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key security blob Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 04/59] LSM: Create an lsm_export data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 05/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the inode_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 06/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the cred_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 07/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the ipc_getsecid and task_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 08/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the kernel_ask_as hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 09/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the getpeersec_dgram hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 10/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the audit_rule_match hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 11/59] LSM: Fix logical operation in lsm_export checks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 12/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 13/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 14/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 15/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 16/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_socket_getpeersec_dgram Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 17/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 18/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 19/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 20/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 21/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 22/59] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 23/59] Audit: Change audit_sig_sid to audit_sig_lsm Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 24/59] Audit: Convert target_sid to an lsm_export structure Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 25/59] Audit: Convert osid " Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 26/59] IMA: Clean out lsm_export scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 27/59] NET: Store LSM access information in the socket blob for UDS Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 29/59] NET: Remove scaffolding on new secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 30/59] NET: Remove netfilter scaffolding for lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 31/59] Netlabel: Replace secids with lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 32/59] LSM: Remove lsm_export scaffolding functions Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 33/59] IMA: FIXUP prototype using lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 34/59] Smack: Restore the release_secctx hook Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 35/59] AppArmor: Remove unnecessary hook stub Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 36/59] LSM: Limit calls to certain module hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 37/59] LSM: Create a data structure for a security context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 38/59] LSM: Use lsm_context in secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 39/59] LSM: Use lsm_context in secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 40/59] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_getsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-09 21:38 [PATCH 00/59] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 21:39 ` [PATCH 28/59] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:17 [PATCH 00/59] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-04-09 19:18 ` [PATCH 28/59] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190409195924.1509-29-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).